1. Cox EJ, Willis L, Bentley K. Integrated simulation with experimentation is a powerful tool for understanding diatom valve morphogenesis. BioSystems. 2012. 109:450–459.
2. Piette MHA, De Letter EA. Drowning: Still a difficult autopsy diagnosis. Forensic Sci Int. 2006. 163:1–9.
3. Ludes B, Quantin S, Coste M, Mangin P. Application of a simple enzymatic digestion method for diatom detection in the diagnosis of drowning in putrified corpses by diatom analysis. Int J Legal Med. 1994. 107:37–41.
4. Peabody AJ. Diatoms and drowning - a review. Med Sci Law. 1980. 20:254–261.
5. Foged N. Diatoms and Drowning - Once More. Forensic Sci Int. 1983. 21:153–159.
6. Ming M, Meng X, Wang E. Evaluation of four digestive methods for extracting diatoms. Forensic Sci Int. 2007. 170:29–34.
7. DiGiancamillo A, Domeneghini C, Gibelli D, Cattaneo C. Diatom extraction with HCl from animal tissues: A technical note. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2011. 13:268–271.
8. Auer A. Qualitative diatom analysis as a tool to diagnose drowning. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1991. 12:213–218.
9. Ludes B, Coste M, Tracqui A, Mangin P. Continuous river monitoring of the diatoms in the diagnosis of drowning. J Forensic Sci. 1996. 41:425–428.