Korean J Psychopharmacol.
2006 Jul;17(4):349-361.
Korean Medication Algorithm for Bipolar Disorder 2006(I)
- Affiliations
-
- 1Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Anyang, Korea.
- 2Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. wmbahk@catholic.ac.kr
- 3Department of Neuropsychiatry, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.
- 4Department of Psychiatry, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.
- 5Naju National Hospital, Naju, Korea.
- 6Department of Psychiatry, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
- 7Department of Psychiatry, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea.
- 8Department of Psychiatry, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
- 9Department of Psychiatry and Stress Research Institude, College of Medicine, Inje University, Seoul, Korea.
- 10Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Konkuk University, Chungju, Korea.
- 11Department of Psychiatry, National Health Insurance Corporation Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea.
- 12Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology, Korean Society for Depressive and Bipolar Disorders, and Korean Academy of Schizophrenia, Seoul, Korea.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
Since the publication of Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Bipolar Disorder (KMAP-BP) in 2002, there has been a substantial need for the revision due to rapid progress in the management for bipolar disorder. We revised KMAP-BP in 2006.
METHODS
The questionnaire to survey the expert opinion of medication for bipolar disorder was completed by the review committee consisting of 53 experienced Korean psychiatrists. It is composed of 37 questions, and each question includes various sub-items. A part regarding treatment strategies for hypomanic episode and maintenance was newly investigated in this revision. We classified the expert opinion to 3 categories (the first-line, the second-line, or the third-line) by chi-square-test.
RESULTS
For acute manic episode, the combination of a mood stabilizer (MS) and an atypical antipsychotic (AAP) is the optimal first-line treatment. Most reviewers recommended divalproex or lithium as a MS. Among AAPs, olanzapine, quetiapine and risperidone were most preferred. On breakthrough manic episode, the optimization of MS or adding AAP was recommended. For moderate bipolar depressed patients, a MS monotherapy or MS with an antidepressant was preferred. Combination of a MS and an antidepressant was recommended as a first-line treatment in severe non-psychotic depression. MS with an AAP and the triple combination of MS, AAP and an antidepressant were recommended for severe bipolar depression with psychotic features. Lithium and divalproex were the first-line choice as MS. Most antidepressants were recommended as a second-line drug. The strategy for breakthrough depression was changed to adding antidepressant after combination of two MS. The combination therapy (MS+AAP or MS+MS) was the most preferred treatment for rapid cycling bipolar patients. There was no 'treatment of choice' in maintenance treatment. In case of bipolar I mania without history of depression, a MS monotherapy was a firstline treatment. In maintenance management for bipolar II disorder, a MS monotherapy or the combinations of a MS and an AAP was preferred. Overall, the preference for lamotrigine and AAP was increased compared to the KMAP-BP 2002. Olanzapine and quetiapine were preferred as the first-line AAP. The carbamazepine and typical antipsychotics were markedly less favored in KMAP-2006 than KMAP-BP 2002.
CONCLUSION
These results suggest that the medication strategies of bipolar disorder are rapidly changing and it reflects the recent studies and clinical experiences.