Korean J Prev Med.
1999 Dec;32(4):538-545.
Validation of the International Classification of Diseases 10th Edition Based Injury Severity Score(ICISS)
- Affiliations
-
- 1Department of Health Policy and Management, Seoul National University College of
Medicine, Korea.
- 2Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha University, Korea.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To compare the predictive power of International Classification of Diseases
10th Edition(ICD-10) based International Classification of Diseases based Injury Severity
Score(ICISS) with Trauma and Injury Severity Score(TRISS) and International
Classification of Diseases 9th Edition Clinical Modification(ICD-9CM) based ICISS in the
injury severity measure.
METHODS
ICD-10 version of Survival Risk Ratios(SRRs) was derived from 47,750
trauma patients from 35 Emergency Centers for 1 year. The predictive power of TRISS,
the ICD-9CM based ICISS and ICD-10 based ICISS were compared in a group of 367
severely injured patients admitted to two university hospitals. The predictive power was
compared by using the measures of discrimination(disparity, sensitivity, specificity,
misclassification rates, and ROC curve analysis) and calibration(Hosmer-Lemeshow
goodness-of-fit statistics), all calculated by logistic regression procedure.
RESULTS
ICD-10 based ICISS showed a lower performance than TRISS and ICD-9CM
based ICISS. When age and Revised Trauma Score(RTS) were incorporated into the
survival probability model, however, ICD-10 based ICISS full model showed a similar
predictive power compared with TRISS and ICD-9CM based ICISS full model. ICD-10
based ICISS had some disadvantages in predicting outcomes among patients with
intracranial injuries. However, such weakness was largely compensated by incorporating
age and RTS in the model.
CONCLUSIONS
The ICISS methodology can be extended to ICD-10 horizon as a standard
injury severity measure in the place of TRISS, especially when age and RTS were
incorporated in the model. In patients with intracranial injuries, the predictive power of
ICD-10 based ICISS was relatively low because of differences in the classifying system
between ICD-10 and ICD-9CM.