Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol.  2013 Mar;6(1):36-40.

Endoscopic Evaluation of Adenoids: Reproducibility Analysis of Current Methods

Affiliations
  • 1Post-graduate Program on Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil. mn-feres@uol.com.br
  • 2Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Abstract


OBJECTIVES
To investigate intra- and interexaminers' reproducibility of usual adenoid hypertrophy assessment methods, according to nasofiberendoscopic examination.
METHODS
Forty children of both sexes, ages ranging between 4 and 14 years, presenting with nasal obstruction and oral breathing suspected to be caused by adenoid hypertrophy, were enrolled in this study. Patients were evaluated by nasofiberendoscopy, and records were referred to and evaluated by two experienced otolaryngologists. Examiners analysed the records according to different evaluation methods; i.e., estimated, and measured percentage of choanal occlusion; as well as subjective and objective classificatory systems of adenoid hypertrophy.
RESULTS
Data disclosed excellent intraexaminer reproducibility for both estimated and measured choanal occlusion. analysis revealed lower reproducibility rates of estimated in relation to measured choanal occlusion. Measured choanal occlusion also demonstrated less agreement among evaluations made through the right and left sides of the nasal cavity. Alternatively, intra- and interexaminers reliability analysis revealed higher agreement for subjective than objective classificatory system. Besides, subjective method demonstrated higher agreement than the objective classificatory system, when opposite sides were compared.
CONCLUSION
Our results suggest that measured is superior to estimated percentage of choanal occlusion, particularly if employed bilaterally, diminishing the lack of agreement between sides. When adenoid categorization is used instead, the authors recommend subjective rather than objective classificatory system of adenoid hypertrophy.

Keyword

Adenoids; Diagnostic techniques; Endoscopy

MeSH Terms

Adenoids
Child
Endoscopy
Humans
Hypertrophy
Nasal Cavity
Nasal Obstruction
Respiration

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Final frame selection (B) derived from the clip (A), and posterior calculation of measured choanal occlusion (MCO) (C). MCO=(Ad/Cho) ×100.


Reference

1. Pagella F, Colombo A, Gatti O, Giourgos G, Matti E. Rhinosinusitis and otitis media: the link with adenoids. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2010; Jan-Mar. 23(1 Suppl):38–40. PMID: 20152078.
2. Farid M, Metwalli N. Computed tomographic evaluation of mouth breathers among paediatric patients. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010; 1. 39(1):1–10. PMID: 20089737.
Article
3. Izu SC, Itamoto CH, Pradella-Hallinan M, Pizarro GU, Tufik S, Pignatari S, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) in mouth breathing children. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2010; Sep-Oct. 76(5):552–556. PMID: 20963335.
4. Jaw TS, Sheu RS, Liu GC, Lin WC. Development of adenoids: a study by measurement with MR images. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 1999; 1. 15(1):12–18. PMID: 10063790.
5. Mlynarek A, Tewfik MA, Hagr A, Manoukian JJ, Schloss MD, Tewfik TL, et al. Lateral neck radiography versus direct video rhinoscopy in assessing adenoid size. J Otolaryngol. 2004; 12. 33(6):360–365. PMID: 15971651.
Article
6. Ysunza A, Pamplona MC, Ortega JM, Prado H. Video fluoroscopy for evaluating adenoid hypertrophy in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008; 8. 72(8):1159–1165. PMID: 18479759.
Article
7. Kubba H, Bingham BJ. Endoscopy in the assessment of children with nasal obstruction. J Laryngol Otol. 2001; 5. 115(5):380–384. PMID: 11410129.
Article
8. Bitar MA, Birjawi G, Youssef M, Fuleihan N. How frequent is adenoid obstruction? Impact on the diagnostic approach. Pediatr Int. 2009; 8. 51(4):478–483. PMID: 19674359.
Article
9. Wormald PJ, Prescott CA. Adenoids: comparison of radiological assessment methods with clinical and endoscopic findings. J Laryngol Otol. 1992; 4. 106(4):342–344. PMID: 1613348.
Article
10. Wang D, Clement P, Kaufman L, Derde MP. Fiberoptic examination of the nasal cavity and nasopharynx in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1992; 7. 24(1):35–44. PMID: 1399302.
Article
11. Demain JG, Goetz DW. Pediatric adenoidal hypertrophy and nasal airway obstruction: reduction with aqueous nasal beclomethasone. Pediatrics. 1995; 3. 95(3):355–364. PMID: 7862473.
Article
12. Clemens J, McMurray JS, Willging JP. Electrocautery versus curette adenoidectomy: comparison of postoperative results. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1998; 3. 43(2):115–122. PMID: 9578120.
Article
13. Cho JH, Lee DH, Lee NS, Won YS, Yoon HR, Suh BD. Size assessment of adenoid and nasopharyngeal airway by acoustic rhinometry in children. J Laryngol Otol. 1999; 10. 113(10):899–905. PMID: 10664704.
Article
14. Monteiro EC, Pilon RR, Dall'Oglio GP. Estudo da hipertrofia adenoideana: endoscopia X radiografia de nasofaringe. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol. 2000; Jan-Feb. 66(1):9–12.
15. Lourenco EA, Lopes Kde C, Pontes A Jr, Oliveira MH, Umemura A, Vargas AL. Comparison between radiological and nasopharyngolaryngoscopic assessment of adenoid tissue volume in mouth breathing children. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2005; Jan-Feb. 71(1):23–27. PMID: 16446887.
16. Parikh SR, Coronel M, Lee JJ, Brown SM. Validation of a new grading system for endoscopic examination of adenoid hypertrophy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006; 11. 135(5):684–687. PMID: 17071294.
Article
17. Wang DY, Bernheim N, Kaufman L, Clement P. Assessment of adenoid size in children by fibreoptic examination. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1997; 4. 22(2):172–177. PMID: 9160934.
Article
18. Cassano P, Gelardi M, Cassano M, Fiorella ML, Fiorella R. Adenoid tissue rhinopharyngeal obstruction grading based on fiberendoscopic findings: a novel approach to therapeutic management. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2003; 12. 67(12):1303–1309. PMID: 14643473.
Article
19. Bravo G, Ysunza A, Arrieta J, Pamplona MC. Videonasopharyngoscopy is useful for identifying children with Pierre Robin sequence and severe obstructive sleep apnea. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005; 1. 69(1):27–33. PMID: 15627443.
Article
20. Castillo TC, Corssen JC, Breinbauer KH, Namoncura PC. Adenoids assessment using nasopharyngolaryngoscopy: a method validation. Rev Otorrinolaringol Cir Cabeza Cuello. 2008; 68(2):143–148.
21. Caylakli F, Hizal E, Yilmaz I, Yilmazer C. Correlation between adenoid-nasopharynx ratio and endoscopic examination of adenoid hypertrophy: a blind, prospective clinical study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009; 11. 73(11):1532–1535. PMID: 19732970.
Article
22. Hulley SB, Cummings SR, Browner WS, Grady DG, Newman TB. Delineando a pesquisa clinica: uma abordagem epidemiologica. 2008. Porto Alegre: Artmed.
23. Rasband WS. ImageJ [Internet]. c1997-2012. cited 2013 Jan 15. Bethesda: US National Institutes of Health;Available from: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/.
24. Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res. 2005; 2. 19(1):231–240. PMID: 15705040.
Article
25. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977; 3. 33(1):159–174. PMID: 843571.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CEO
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr