Korean J Pain.  2014 Jan;27(1):54-62. 10.3344/kjp.2014.27.1.54.

Intravenous Nefopam Reduces Postherpetic Neuralgia during the Titration of Oral Medications

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Pusan National University, Yangsan, Korea. pain@pusan.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Plastic Surgery, School of Medicine, Dongguk University, Gyeongju, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
The recently known analgesic action mechanisms of nefopam (NFP) are similar to those of anticonvulsants and antidepressants in neuropathic pain treatment. It is difficult to prescribe high doses of oral neuropathic drugs without titration due to adverse effects. Unfortunately, there are few available intravenous analgesics for the immediate management of acute flare-ups of the chronic neuropathic pain. The aim of this study was to determine the additional analgesic effects for neuropathic pain of NFP and its adverse effects during the titration of oral medications for neuropathic pain among inpatients with postherpetic neuralgia (PHN).
METHODS
Eighty inpatients with PHN were randomly divided into either the NFP or normal saline (NS) groups. Each patient received a 3-day intravenous continuous infusion of either NFP with a consecutive dose reduction of 60, 40, and 20 mg/d, or NS simultaneously while dose titrations of oral medications for neuropathic pain gradually increased every 3 days. The efficacy of additional NFP was evaluated by using the neuropathic pain symptom inventory (NPSI) score for 12 days. Adverse effects were also recorded.
RESULTS
The median NPSI score was significantly lower in the NFP group from days 1 to 6 of hospitalization. The representative alleviating symptoms of pain after using NFP were both spontaneous and evoked neuropathic pain. Reported common adverse effects were nausea, dizziness, and somnolence, in order of frequency.
CONCLUSIONS
An intravenous continuous infusion of NFP reduces spontaneous and evoked neuropathic pain with tolerable adverse effects during the titration of oral medications in inpatients with PHN.

Keyword

anticonvulsants; antidepressants; nefopam; postherpetic neuralgia; titration

MeSH Terms

Analgesics
Anticonvulsants
Antidepressive Agents
Dizziness
Hospitalization
Humans
Inpatients
Nausea
Nefopam*
Neuralgia
Neuralgia, Postherpetic*
Analgesics
Anticonvulsants
Antidepressive Agents
Nefopam

Figure

  • Fig. 1 A schedule for the continuous infusion of nefopam with a consecutive dose reduction in hospitalized patients with postherpetic neuralgia while dose-escalating of oral medications. Each patient received a 3-day intravenous continuous infusion of either nefopam (NFP) with a consecutive dose reduction of 60, 40, and 20 mg/d or NS simultaneously while dose titrations of oral medications for neuropathic pain gradually increased every 3 days. A rescue analgesic, 10 mg of oral codeine, was given at each NPSI score VAS > 40 less than 5 times a day. The efficacy of additional NFP was evaluated by using the neuropathic pain symptom inventory (NPSI) score for 12 days. Adverse effects were also recorded. Discharge criteria after the 12-day-admission included: (1) NPSI score < 40%, (2) spontaneous pain < 3 h during the past 24 h, (3) pain attack < 5 times during the past 24 h, and (4) no serious adverse effects, including dizziness, somnolence, or ataxia.

  • Fig. 2 The median scores of the grade of duration of spontaneous pain (SP) and number of pain attack (PA) during study days. (A) *The grade by the duration of SP during the past 24 h was lower, and (B) *the grade of the number of PA during the past 24 h was lower in NFP group from the day 2 to 6 of hospitalization (P < 0.05 compared to those of NS group). All data are expressed SD ± error. NFP: nefopam, NS: normal saline. Grade by duration of SP: grade 1 (less than 1 h), grade 2 (between 1 and 3 h), grade 3 (between 4 and 7 h), grade 4 (8 and 12 h), and grade 5 (permanently). Grade by frequency of PA: grade 0 (no pain attack), grade 1 (between 1 and 5), grade 2 (between 6 and 10), grade 3 (between 11 and 20), and grade 4 (more than 20).

  • Fig. 3 Rescue medication requirement and consumption. *Higher requirement and consumption of average additional rescue medication showed in NS group from the day 1 to 6 of hospitalization (P < 0.05 compared to those of NFP group). All data are expressed mean ± SD.

  • Fig. 4 Adverse effects. *Nefopam (NFP) increased the frequency of dry mouth, dizziness, nausea and ataxia, in order of frequency, during the initial period of the study days 1 to 6 (P < 0.05 compared to those of normal saline [NS] group). There was no difference between the groups in overall frequencies of occurrence for each adverse effect. Dry mouth in both groups was an intolerable adverse effect which showed a never-decreasing and even-increasing symptom till the end of the study days.


Cited by  4 articles

Medications in Treatment of Postherpetic Neuralgia
Sang Wook Shin
Korean J Pain. 2014;27(1):1-2.    doi: 10.3344/kjp.2014.27.1.1.

Nefopam Reduces Dysesthesia after Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy
Young Min Ok, Ji Hyun Cheon, Eun Ji Choi, Eun Jung Chang, Ho Myung Lee, Kyung Hoon Kim
Korean J Pain. 2016;29(1):40-47.    doi: 10.3344/kjp.2016.29.1.40.

Use of Nefopam in Perioperative Pain Management; Keeping Nefopam in between
Jeong Il Choi
Korean J Pain. 2016;29(2):71-72.    doi: 10.3344/kjp.2016.29.2.71.

Earlier treatment improves the chances of complete relief from postherpetic neuralgia
Dong Hee Kang, Su Young Kim, Hyuck Goo Kim, Jung Hyun Park, Tae Kyun Kim, Kyung Hoon Kim
Korean J Pain. 2017;30(3):214-219.    doi: 10.3344/kjp.2017.30.3.214.


Reference

1. Turk DC, Okifuji A. Pain terms and taxonomies. In : Fishman SM, Ballantyne JC, Rathmell JP, editors. Bonica's management of pain. 4th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;2010. p. 16.
2. Heel RC, Brogden RN, Pakes GE, Speight TM, Avery GS. Nefopam: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy. Drugs. 1980; 19:249–267. PMID: 6991238.
3. Novelli A, Díaz-Trelles R, Groppetti A, Fernández-Sánchez MT. Nefopam inhibits calcium influx, cGMP formation, and NMDA receptor-dependent neurotoxicity following activation of voltage sensitive calcium channels. Amino Acids. 2005; 28:183–191. PMID: 15714253.
Article
4. Verleye M, André N, Heulard I, Gillardin JM. Nefopam blocks voltage-sensitive sodium channels and modulates glutamatergic transmission in rodents. Brain Res. 2004; 1013:249–255. PMID: 15193535.
Article
5. Biella GE, Groppetti A, Novelli A, Fernández-Sánchez MT, Manfredi B, Sotgiu ML. Neuronal sensitization and its behavioral correlates in a rat model of neuropathy are prevented by a cyclic analog of orphenadrine. J Neurotrauma. 2003; 20:593–601. PMID: 12906743.
Article
6. Novelli A, Groppetti A, Rossoni G, Manfredi B, Ferrero-Gutiérrez A, Pérez-Gómez A, et al. Nefopam is more potent than carbamazepine for neuroprotection against veratridine in vitro and has anticonvulsant properties against both electrical and chemical stimulation. Amino Acids. 2007; 32:323–332. PMID: 17021653.
Article
7. Czuczwar M, Czuczwar K, Cięszczyk J, Kiś J, Saran T, Łuszczki JJ, et al. Nefopam enhances the protective activity of antiepileptics against maximal electroshock-induced convulsions in mice. Pharmacol Rep. 2011; 63:690–696. PMID: 21857079.
Article
8. Löscher W, Schmidt D. New Horizons in the development of antiepileptic drugs: Innovative strategies. Epilepsy Res. 2006; 69:183–272. PMID: 16835945.
Article
9. Marazziti D, Rotondo A, Ambrogi F, Cassano GB. Analgesia by nefopam: does it act through serotonin? Drugs Exp Clin Res. 1991; 17:259–261. PMID: 1756689.
10. Evans MS, Lysakowski C, Tramèr MR. Nefopam for the prevention of postoperative pain: quantitative systematic review. Br J Anaesth. 2008; 101:610–617. PMID: 18796441.
Article
11. Sunshine A, Laska E. Nefopam and morphine in man. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1975; 18:530–534. PMID: 1102231.
Article
12. Taniguchi Y, Ali SZ, Kimberger O, Zmoos S, Lauber R, Markstaller M, et al. The effects of nefopam on the gain and maximum intensity of shivering in healthy volunteers. Anesth Analg. 2010; 111:409–414. PMID: 20529984.
Article
13. Alfonsi P, Passard A, Gaude-Joindreau V, Guignard B, Sessler DI, Chauvin M. Nefopam and alfentanil additively reduce the shivering threshold in humans whereas nefopam and clonidine do not. Anesthesiology. 2009; 111:102–109. PMID: 19512866.
Article
14. Bouhassira D, Attal N, Fermanian J, Alchaar H, Gautron M, Masquelier E, et al. Development and validation of the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory. Pain. 2004; 108:248–257. PMID: 15030944.
Article
15. Thakur R, Kent JL, Dworkin RH. Herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia. In : Fishman SM, Ballantyne JC, Rathmell JP, editors. Bonica's management of pain. 4th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;2010. p. 338–357.
16. Magrinelli F, Zanette G, Tamburin S. Neuropathic pain: diagnosis and treatment. Pract Neurol. 2013; 13:292–307. PMID: 23592730.
Article
17. Attal N. Neuropathic pain: mechanisms, therapeutic approach, and interpretation of clinical trials. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2012; 18:161–175. PMID: 22810075.
18. Costigan M, Woolf CJ. Pain: molecular mechanisms. J Pain. 2000; 1(3 Suppl):35–44. PMID: 14622841.
Article
19. Durrieu G, Olivier P, Bagheri H, Montastruc JL. French Network of Pharmacovigilance Centers. Overview of adverse reactions to nefopam: an analysis of the French pharmacovigilance database. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2007; 21:555–558. PMID: 17868209.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr