Korean J Orthod.  2012 Jun;42(3):144-154. 10.4041/kjod.2012.42.3.144.

Management of acquired open bite associated with temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis using miniscrew anchorage

Affiliations
  • 1Institute of Health Biosciences, The University of Tokushima Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan. etanaka@dent.tokushima-u.ac.jp
  • 2Nonoyama Orthodontic Clinic, Higashihiroshima, Japan.
  • 3Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan.

Abstract

This article reports the orthodontic treatment of a patient with skeletal mandibular retrusion and an anterior open bite due to temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis (TMJ-OA) using miniscrew anchorage. A 46-year-old woman had a Class II malocclusion with a retropositioned mandible. Her overjet and overbite were 7.0 mm and -1.6 mm, respectively. She had limited mouth opening, TMJ sounds, and pain. Condylar resorption was observed in both TMJs. Her TMJ pain was reduced by splint therapy, and then orthodontic treatment was initiated. Titanium miniscrews were placed at the posterior maxilla to intrude the molars. After 2 years and 7 months of orthodontic treatment, an acceptable occlusion was achieved without any recurrence of TMJ symptoms. The retropositioned mandible was considerably improved, and the lips showed less tension upon lip closure. The maxillary molars were intruded by 1.5 mm, and the mandible was subsequently rotated counterclockwise. Magnetic resonance imaging of both condyles after treatment showed avascular necrosis-like structures. During a 2-year retention period, an acceptable occlusion was maintained without recurrence of the open bite. In conclusion, correction of open bite and clockwise-rotated mandible through molar intrusion using titanium miniscrews is effective for the management of TMJ-OA with jaw deformity.

Keyword

Orthodontic mini-implant; TMJ; Orthodontic treatment

MeSH Terms

Congenital Abnormalities
Female
Humans
Jaw
Lip
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Malocclusion
Mandible
Maxilla
Middle Aged
Molar
Mouth
Open Bite
Osteoarthritis
Overbite
Recurrence
Retention (Psychology)
Retrognathia
Splints
Temporomandibular Joint
Titanium
Titanium

Figure

  • Figure 1 Pretreatment photographs (age, 46 years 9 months).

  • Figure 2 Pretreatment records. A, Panoramic radiograph; B, lateral cephalograph; C, poster-anterior cephalograph; D, lateral transcranial radiograph of the temporomandibular joint (age, 46 years 9 months). ICP, Intercuspal position.

  • Figure 3 Pretreatment cephalometric analysis. A, lateral cephalometric tracing (solid line) superimposed on the mean profilogram (dotted line); B, cephalometric measurements. SNA, Sella-Nasion-A point angle; SNB, Sella-Nasion-B point angle; ANB, A point-Nasion-B point angle; GoA, Gonial angle; FMA, Frankfort-mandibular angle; IMPA, Incisor-mandibular plane angle; FMIA, Frankfort-mandibular incisor angle; U1-FH, Axial inclination of the upper central incisor in relation to Frankfort plane; Y-axis, Angle between Frankfort plane and Sella-Gnathion line; Interincisal A, angle between the axial inclinations of the upper and lower central incisors; Ramus height, Length of the mandibular ramus (Articulare-Gonion); Me to palatal pl., Lower anterior facial height (Menton to palatal plane). SD, Standard deviation.

  • Figure 4 Intraoral photographs during treatment. A, 6 months after the start of treatment; B, 12 months after the start of treatment; C, 18 months after the start of treatment.

  • Figure 5 Posttreatment photographs (age, 49 years 4 months).

  • Figure 6 Posttreatment records. A, Panoramic radiograph; B, lateral cephalograph; C, poster-anterior cephalograph; D, lateral transcranial radiograph of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) (age, 49 years 4 months). ICP, Intercuspal position.

  • Figure 7 Posttreatment and 2- year retention cephalometric analyses. Lateral cephalometric tracings at posttreatment (dotted line) and 2-year retention (double dotted line) superimposed on the pretreatment tracings (solid line) on the Sella-Nasion plane at Sella (A); on the palatal plane at Ptm' (B); and on the mandibular plane at Menton (C). Cephalometric measurements before treatment (solid line), after (dotted line) treatment, and at 2-year retention (double dotted line) (D). SNA, Sella-Nasion-A point angle; SNB, Sella-Nasion-B point angle; ANB, A point-Nasion-B point angle; GoA, Gonial angle; FMA, Frankfort-mandibular angle; IMPA, Incisor-mandibular plane angle; FMIA, Frankfort-mandibular incisor angle; U1-FH, Axial inclination of the upper central incisor in relation to Frankfort plane; Y-axis, Angle between Frankfort plane and Sella-Gnathion line; Interincisal A, angle between the axial inclinations of the upper and lower central incisors; Ramus height, Length of the mandibular ramus (Articulare-Gonion); Me to palatal pl., Lower anterior facial height (Menton to palatal plane). SD, Standard deviation.

  • Figure 8 Magnetic resonance imaging of the temporomandibular joint after active orthodontic treatment.

  • Figure 9 Two-year post retention photographs (age, 51 years 5 months).

  • Figure 10 Two-year post retention records. A, Panoramic radiograph; B, lateral cephalograph; C, poster-anterior cephalograph; D, lateral transcranial radiograph of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) (age, 51 years 5 months). ICP, Intercuspal position.


Cited by  1 articles

Treatment and retention of relapsed anterior open-bite with low tongue posture and tongue-tie: A 10-year follow-up
Yu-Jin Seo, Su-Jung Kim, Janchivdorj Munkhshur, Kyu-Rhim Chung, Peter Ngan, Seong-Hun Kim
Korean J Orthod. 2014;44(4):203-216.    doi: 10.4041/kjod.2014.44.4.203.


Reference

1. Tanaka E, Detamore MS, Mercuri LG. Degenerative disorders of the temporomandibular joint: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment. J Dent Res. 2008. 87:296–307.
Article
2. Arnett GW, Milam SB, Gottesman L. Progressive mandibular retrusion-idiopathic condylar resorption. Part II. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996. 110:117–127.
Article
3. Nitzan DW. The process of lubrication impairment and its involvement in temporomandibular joint disc displacement: a theoretical concept. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001. 59:36–45.
Article
4. Laskin D. Etiology and pathogenesis of internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint (Current controversies in surgery for internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint). Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 1994. 6:217–222.
5. Kuroda S, Tanimoto K, Izawa T, Fujihara S, Koolstra JH, Tanaka E. Biomechanical and biochemical characteristics of the mandibular condylar cartilage. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009. 17:1408–1415.
Article
6. De Clercq CA, Neyt LF, Mommaerts MY, Abeloos JV, De Mot BM. Condylar resorption in orthognathic surgery: a retrospective study. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1994. 9:233–240.
7. Crawford JG, Stoelinga PJ, Blijdorp PA, Brouns JJ. Stability after reoperation for progressive condylar resorption after orthognathic surgery: report of seven cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994. 52:460–466.
Article
8. Wolford LM, Reiche-Fischel O, Mehra P. Changes in temporomandibular joint dysfunction after orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003. 61:655–660.
Article
9. Gonçalves JR, Cassano DS, Wolford LM, Santos-Pinto A, Márquez IM. Postsurgical stability of counterclockwise maxillomandibular advancement surgery: affect of articular disc repositioning. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008. 66:724–738.
Article
10. Kuroda S, Katayama A, Takano-Yamamoto T. Severe anterior open-bite case treated using titanium screw anchorage. Angle Orthod. 2004. 74:558–567.
11. Wada K, Otani S, Sakuda M. Yamauchi K, Sakuda M, editors. Morphometric analysis in maxillary protrusion. Maxillary Protrusion. 1989. Tokyo: Ishiyaku;95–130. [in Japanese].
12. Magnusson T, Ahlborg G, Svartz K. Function of the masticatory system in 20 patients with mandibular hypo- or hyperplasia after correction by a sagittal split osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990. 19:289–293.
Article
13. Moore KE, Gooris PJ, Stoelinga PJ. The contributing role of condylar resorption to skeletal relapse following mandibular advancement surgery: report of five cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1991. 49:448–460.
Article
14. Wolford LM, Cottrell DA, Henry CH. Temporomandibular joint reconstruction of the complex patient with the Techmedica custom-made total joint prosthesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994. 52:2–10.
Article
15. Tanaka E, Tanaka M, Watanabe M, Del Pozo R, Tanne K. Influences of occlusal and skeletal discrepancies on biomechanical environment in the TMJ during maximum clenching: an analytic approach with the finite element method. J Oral Rehabil. 2001. 28:888–894.
Article
16. Umemori M, Sugawara J, Mitani H, Nagasaka H, Kawamura H. Skeletal anchorage system for open-bite correction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999. 115:166–174.
Article
17. Kuroda S, Sugawara Y, Tamamura N, Takano-Yamamoto T. Anterior open bite with temporomandibular disorder treated with titanium screw anchorage: evaluation of morphological and functional improvement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007. 131:550–560.
Article
18. Kuroda S, Sakai Y, Tamamura N, Deguchi T, Takano-Yamamoto T. Treatment of severe anterior open bite with skeletal anchorage in adults: comparison with orthognathic surgery outcomes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007. 132:599–605.
Article
19. Kuroda S, Tanaka E. Application of temporary anchorage devices for the treatment of adult Class III malocclusions. Semin Orthod. 2011. 17:91–97.
Article
20. Tanaka E, Kikuchi K, Sasaki A, Tanne K. An adult case of TMJ osteoarthrosis treated with splint therapy and the subsequent orthodontic occlusal reconstruction: adaptive change of the condyle during the treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000. 118:566–571.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJOD
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr