Blood Res.  2013 Sep;48(3):185-192. 10.5045/br.2013.48.3.185.

Evaluation of prognostic factors in patients with therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. hschi@amc.seoul.kr

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Therapy-related AML (t-AML) occurs as a late complication of chemotherapy administered to treat a prior disorder. Prognostic factors affecting the clinical outcome in t-AML have not yet been clearly defined; therefore, we evaluated these factors in this study.
METHODS
Forty-eight patients diagnosed with t-AML within the past 10 years were enrolled, and their chemotherapy regimens categorized into 4 groups: alkylating agents (AK) only, topoisomerase II inhibitors (TI) and AK, TI only, and others. The prognostic factors affecting clinical outcome were evaluated.
RESULTS
Five (10.4%), 21 (43.8%), 9 (18.8%), and 13 (27.0%) patients were treated with AK only, AK and TI, TI only, and others, respectively. Patients with an AML M3 phenotype showed significantly longer overall survival (OS; 55.1 vs. 14.3 months, P=0.040) and disease-free survival (DFS; 61.2 vs. 17.5 months, P=0.049) than other phenotypes. In contrast, patients with a complex karyotype showed significantly shorter OS (7.9 vs. 31.3 months, P=0.008) and DFS (9.5 vs. 38.6 months, P=0.046); additionally, patients with chromosome 5 or 7 abnormalities showed significantly shorter OS (9.1 vs. 30.7 months, P=0.011) than other phenotypes. Only the presence of a complex karyotype or AML M3 phenotype retained prognostic impact in a multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSION
Only the AML M3 phenotype was identified as having a good prognosis, and this might suggest that it exhibits unique clinical features in t-AML patients. Moreover, our findings indicated that karyotype was the strongest prognostic indicator and predicted a poor prognosis for t-AML patients with a complex karyotype.

Keyword

Prognosis; Therapy; Related; AML

MeSH Terms

Alkylating Agents
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 5
Disease-Free Survival
Humans
Karyotype
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute
Phenotype
Prognosis
Topoisomerase II Inhibitors
Alkylating Agents
Topoisomerase II Inhibitors

Figure

  • Fig. 1 The overall survival (A) and disease-free survival (B) of patients with therapy-related AML. Patients were categorized into 4 chemotherapeutic regimen groups for the treatment a primary neoplastic disorder: alkylating agents (AK) only, topoisomerase II inhibitors (TI) and AK, TI only, and others.

  • Fig. 2 The overall survival (A) and disease-free survival (B) of patients with therapy-related AML according to the presence of chromosome 5 or 7 abnormalities at diagnosis.

  • Fig. 3 The overall survival (A) and disease-free survival (B) of patients with therapy-related AML according to the presence of a complex karyotype at diagnosis.

  • Fig. 4 The overall survival (A) and disease-free survival (B) of patients with therapy-related AML according to the presence of the FAB M3 phenotype at diagnosis.


Cited by  2 articles

Characteristics of hematologic malignancies with coexisting t(9;22) and inv(16) chromosomal abnormalities
Eunhee Han, Hyeyoung Lee, Myungshin Kim, Yonggoo Kim, Kyungja Han, Sung-Eun Lee, Hee-Je Kim, Dong-Wook Kim
Blood Res. 2014;49(1):22-28.    doi: 10.5045/br.2014.49.1.22.

Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma
Jun Ho Yi, Jun Ho Jang, Chul Won Jung
Blood Res. 2021;56(4):349-353.    doi: 10.5045/br.2021.2021197.


Reference

1. Pedersen-Bjergaard J, Andersen MK, Johansson B. Balanced chromosome aberrations in leukemias following chemotherapy with DNA-topoisomerase II inhibitors. J Clin Oncol. 1998; 16:1897–1898. PMID: 9586907.
Article
2. Cortes J, OBrien S, Kantarjian H, et al. Abnormalities in the long arm of chromosome 11 (11q) in patients with de novo and secondary acute myelogenous leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes. Leukemia. 1994; 8:2174–2178. PMID: 7808007.
3. Quesnel B, Kantarjian H, Bjergaard JP, et al. Therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;21), inv(16), and t(8;16): a report on 25 cases and review of the literature. J Clin Oncol. 1993; 11:2370–2379. PMID: 8246025.
Article
4. Leone G, Mele L, Pulsoni A, Equitani F, Pagano L. The incidence of secondary leukemias. Haematologica. 1999; 84:937–945. PMID: 10509043.
5. Pui CH, Relling MV, Rivera GK, et al. Epipodophyllotoxin-related acute myeloid leukemia: a study of 35 cases. Leukemia. 1995; 9:1990–1996. PMID: 8609707.
6. Michels SD, McKenna RW, Arthur DC, Brunning RD. Therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome: a clinical and morphologic study of 65 cases. Blood. 1985; 65:1364–1372. PMID: 3857944.
Article
7. Singh ZN, Huo D, Anastasi J, et al. Therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome: morphologic subclassification may not be clinically relevant. Am J Clin Pathol. 2007; 127:197–205. PMID: 17210514.
8. Grossmann V, Schnittger S, Kohlmann A, et al. A novel hierarchical prognostic model of AML solely based on molecular mutations. Blood. 2012; 120:2963–2972. PMID: 22915647.
Article
9. Kuhnl A, Grimwade D. Molecular markers in acute myeloid leukaemia. Int J Hematol. 2012; 96:153–163. PMID: 22791509.
Article
10. Kayser S, Dohner K, Krauter J, et al. The impact of therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (AML) on outcome in 2853 adult patients with newly diagnosed AML. Blood. 2011; 117:2137–2145. PMID: 21127174.
Article
11. Antonijevic N, Suvajdzic N, Terzic T, et al. Favourable prognostic factors in therapy related acute myeloid leukaemia. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2011; 139:347–352. PMID: 21858974.
Article
12. Schoch C, Kern W, Schnittger S, Hiddemann W, Haferlach T. Karyotype is an independent prognostic parameter in therapyrelated acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML): an analysis of 93 patients with t-AML in comparison to 1091 patients with de novo AML. Leukemia. 2004; 18:120–125. PMID: 14586477.
Article
13. Huh HJ, Lee SH, Yoo KH, et al. Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms in 39 Korean patients: a single institution experience. Ann Lab Med. 2013; 33:97–104. PMID: 23483787.
Article
14. Smith SM, Le Beau MM, Huo D, et al. Clinical-cytogenetic associations in 306 patients with therapy-related myelodysplasia and myeloid leukemia: the University of Chicago series. Blood. 2003; 102:43–52. PMID: 12623843.
Article
15. Shim H, Chi HS, Jang S, et al. Therapy-related acute leukemia in breast cancer patients: twelve cases treated with a topoisomerase inhibitor. Korean J Hematol. 2010; 45:177–182. PMID: 21120206.
Article
16. Andersen MK, Larson RA, Mauritzson N, Schnittger S, Jhanwar SC, Pedersen-Bjergaard J. Balanced chromosome abnormalities inv(16) and t(15;17) in therapy-related myelodysplastic syndromes and acute leukemia: report from an international workshop. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2002; 33:395–400. PMID: 11921273.
Article
17. Detourmignies L, Castaigne S, Stoppa AM, et al. Therapy-related acute promyelocytic leukemia: a report on 16 cases. J Clin Oncol. 1992; 10:1430–1435. PMID: 1517786.
Article
18. Beaumont M, Sanz M, Carli PM, et al. Therapy-related acute promyelocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21:2123–2137. PMID: 12775738.
Article
19. Pulsoni A, Pagano L, Lo Coco F, et al. Clinicobiological features and outcome of acute promyelocytic leukemia occurring as a second tumor: the GIMEMA experience. Blood. 2002; 100:1972–1976. PMID: 12200354.
Article
20. Duffield AS, Aoki J, Levis M, et al. Clinical and pathologic features of secondary acute promyelocytic leukemia. Am J Clin Pathol. 2012; 137:395–402. PMID: 22338051.
Article
Full Text Links
  • BR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr