Asian Spine J.
2015 Jun;9(3):327-337. 10.4184/asj.2015.9.3.327.
Detecting Facet Joint and Lateral Mass Injuries of the Subaxial Cervical Spine in Major Trauma Patients
- Affiliations
-
- 1Stoke Mandeville Spinal Foundation, National Spinal Injuries Centre, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Aylesbury, UK. jvanmiddendorp@gmail.com
- 2Harris Manchester College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
- 3Logan Hospital, Logan City, QLD, Australia.
- 4Department of Orthopaedics, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand.
- 5Department of Orthopaedics, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand.
- 6The Spinal Unit, Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
- 7The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
- 8Department of Orthopaedics Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK.
- 9Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD, Australia.
- 10Trauma Service, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
- 11AOSpine Reference Centre, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD, Australia.
- KMID: 2270131
- DOI: http://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2015.9.3.327
Abstract
- STUDY DESIGN: Radiologic imaging measurement study.
PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of detecting lateral mass and facet joint injuries of the subaxial cervical spine on plain radiographs using computed tomography (CT) scan images as a reference standard; and the integrity of morphological landmarks of the lateral mass and facet joints of the subaxial cervical spine.
OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Injuries of lateral mass and facet joints potentially lead to an unstable subaxial cervical spine and concomitant neurological sequelae. However, no study has evaluated the accuracy of detecting specific facet joint injuries.
METHODS
Eight spinal surgeons scored four sets of the same, randomly re-ordered, 30 cases with and without facet joint injuries of the subaxial cervical spine. Two surveys included conventional plain radiographs series (test) and another two surveys included CT scan images (reference). Facet joint injury characteristics were assessed for accuracy and reliability. Raw agreement, Fleiss kappa, Cohen's kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient statistics were used for reliability analysis. Majority rules were used for accuracy analysis.
RESULTS
Of the 21 facet joint injuries discerned on CT scan images, 10 were detected in both plain radiograph surveys (sensitivity, 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26-0.70). There were no false positive facet joint injuries in either of the first two X-ray surveys (specificity, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.63-1.0). Five of the 11 cases with missed injuries had an injury below the lowest visible articulating level on radiographs. CT scan images resulted in superior inter- and intra-rater agreement values for assessing morphologic injury characteristics of facet joint injuries.
CONCLUSIONS
Plain radiographs are not accurate, nor reliable for the assessment of facet joint injuries of the subaxial cervical spine. CT scans offer reliable diagnostic information required for the detection and treatment planning of facet joint injuries.
- Full Text Links
-
- Actions
-
Cited
- CITED
-
- Close
- Share
-
- Similar articles
-
- Reconstruction of the Cervical Lateral Mass Using 3-Dimensional-Printed Prostheses
- Measurements of Lateral Mass of Cervical Spine Using MRI for Lateral Mass Screw Fixation
- Subaxial Cervical Spine Injuries: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations
- Neglected Unilateral Subluxation of Facet Joint in Lumbar Spine of Multiple Trauma Patient: A Case Report
- Facet Joint Injuries in Acute Cervical Spine Trauma: Evaluation with CT and MRI
