Ann Surg Treat Res.  2015 Mar;88(3):119-125. 10.4174/astr.2015.88.3.119.

A preliminary study for the development of indices and the current state of surgical site infections (SSIs) in Korea: the Korean Surgical Site Infection Surveillance (KOSSIS) program

• Park SJ
• Lee KY
• Park JW
• Lee JG
• Choi HJ
• Chun HK
• Kang JG

• KMID: 2266868
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2015.88.3.119

Abstract

PURPOSE
We aimed to develop an effective system for surgical site infection (SSI) surveillance and examine the current domestic state of SSIs for common abdominal surgeries in Korea.
METHODS
The Korean Surgical Site Infection Surveillance (KOSSIS) program was developed as an SSI surveillance system. A prospective multicenter study in nine university-affiliated or general hospitals was conducted for patients who underwent gastrectomy, cholecystectomy, appendectomy, colectomy, or proctectomy between August 16 and September 30 in 2012. Patients were monitored for up to 30 days by combining direct observation and a postdischarge surgeon survey. Data on SSIs were prospectively collected with KOSSIS secretarial support according to a common protocol. Operation-specific SSI rates were stratified according to risk factors and compared with data from the Korean Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System (KONIS) and National Healthcare Safety Network. A focus group interview was conducted with participating hospitals for feedback.
RESULTS
A total of 1,088 operations were monitored: 207 gastrectomies, 318 cholecystectomies, 270 appendectomies, 197 colectomies, and 96 proctectomies. Operation-specific SSI rates determined by the KOSSIS program were substantially higher than those found in KONIS (7.73% [95% confidence interval, 4.5%-12.3%] vs. 3.4% for gastrectomies, 10.15% [95% confidence interval, 6.1%-15.2%] vs. 4.0% for colectomy, and 13.5% [95% confidence interval, 7.4%-22.0%] vs. 4.2% for proctectomy).
CONCLUSION
Despite a short surveillance period and heterogenous group of hospitals, our results suggest that KOSSIS could be a useful program to enhance SSI surveillance in Korea.

Keyword

Surgical wound infection; Prevention; Surveillance program; General surgery

MeSH Terms

Appendectomy
Cholecystectomy
Colectomy
Cross Infection
Delivery of Health Care
Focus Groups
Gastrectomy
Hospitals, General
Humans
Korea
Prospective Studies
Risk Factors
Surgical Wound Infection

Reference

1. Lee KY, Coleman K, Paech D, Norris S, Tan JT. The epidemiology and cost of surgical site infections in Korea: a systematic review. J Korean Surg Soc. 2011; 81:295–307.

2. Kirkland KB, Briggs JP, Trivette SL, Wilkinson WE, Sexton DJ. The impact of surgical-site infections in the 1990s: attributable mortality, excess length of hospitalization, and extra costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999; 20:725–730.

3. Leaper DJ, van Goor H, Reilly J, Petrosillo N, Geiss HK, Torres AJ, et al. Surgical site infection: a European perspective of incidence and economic burden. Int Wound J. 2004; 1:247–273.

4. Kim YK, Kim HY, Kim ES, Kim HB, Uh Y, Jung SY, et al. The Korean Surgical Site Infection Surveillance System Report, 2009. Korean J Nosocomial Infect Control. 2010; 15:1–13.

5. Kim YK, Kim HY, Kim ES, Kim HB, Jin HY, Lee JY, et al. Korean Surgical Site Infection Surveillance System Report: data summary from July 2010 through June 2011. Korean J Nosocomial Infect Control. 2012; 17:1–12.

6. Kwak YG, Lee SO, Kim HY, Kim YK, Park ES, Jin HY, et al. Risk factors for deviceassociated infection related to organisational characteristics of intensive care units: findings from the Korean Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. J Hosp Infect. 2010; 75:195–199.

7. Kim ES, Kim HB, Song KH, Kim YK, Kim HH, Jin HY, et al. Prospective nationwide surveillance of surgical site infections after gastric surgery and risk factor analysis in the Korean Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System (KONIS). Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012; 33:572–580.

8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Monitoring hospital-acquired infections to promote patient safety: United States, 1990-1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2000; 49:149–153.

9. Coello R, Gastmeier P, de Boer AS. Surveillance of hospital-acquired infection in England, Germany, and The Netherlands: will international comparison of rates be possible? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2001; 22:393–397.

10. Wick EC, Gibbs L, Indorf LA, Varma MG, Garcia-Aguilar J. Implementation of quality measures to reduce surgical site infection in colorectal patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008; 51:1004–1009.

11. Tanner J, Padley W, Kiernan M, Leaper D, Norrie P, Baggott R. A benchmark too far: findings from a national survey of surgical site infection surveillance. J Hosp Infect. 2013; 83:87–91.

12. Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control. 2008; 36:309–332.

13. Garner JS. CDC guideline for prevention of surgical wound infections, 1985. Supersedes guideline for prevention of surgical wound infections published in 1982. (Originally published in November 1985). Revised. Infect Control. 1986; 7:193–200.

14. Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel EL Jr. ASA physical status classifications: a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology. 1978; 49:239–243.

15. The Society for Hospital Epidemiology of America. The Association for Practitioners in Infection Control. The Centers for Disease Control. The Surgical Infection Society. Consensus paper on the surveillance of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1992; 13:599–605.

16. Edwards JR, Peterson KD, Mu Y, Banerjee S, Allen-Bridson K, Morrell G, et al. National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) report: data summary for 2006 through 2008, issued December 2009. Am J Infect Control. 2009; 37:783–805.