Ann Rehabil Med.  2011 Jun;35(3):309-315. 10.5535/arm.2011.35.3.309.

The Effect of Virtual Reality Training on Unilateral Spatial Neglect in Stroke Patients

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 138-736, Korea. mhchun@amc.seoul.kr
  • 2Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju 690-756, Korea.

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
To investigate the effect of virtual reality training on unilateral spatial neglect in stroke patients. METHOD: Twenty-four stroke patients (14 males and 10 females, mean age=64.7) who had unilateral spatial neglect as a result of right hemisphere stroke were recruited. All patients were randomly assigned to either the virtual reality (VR) group (n=12) or the control group (n=12). The VR group received VR training, which stimulated the left side of their bodies. The control group received conventional neglect therapy such as visual scanning training. Both groups received therapy for 30 minutes a day, five days per week for three weeks. Outcome measurements included star cancellation test, line bisection test, Catherine Bergego scale (CBS), and the Korean version of modified Barthel index (K-MBI). These measurements were taken before and after treatment.
RESULTS
There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics and initial values between the two groups. The changes in star cancellation test results and CBS in the VR group were significantly higher than those of the control group after treatment. The changes in line bisection test score and the K-MBI in the VR group were not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION
This study suggests that virtual reality training may be a beneficial therapeutic technique on unilateral spatial neglect in stroke patients.

Keyword

Neglect; Stroke; Hemiplegia; Virtual reality

MeSH Terms

Female
Hemiplegia
Humans
Male
Stroke

Figure

  • Fig. 1 (A) Virtual reality experimental set up (IREX system®, Vivid group, Toronto, Canada), (B) Bird-ball, (C) Coconut, (D) Conveyer.


Cited by  1 articles

Novel Virtual Reality Application in Field of Neurorehabilitation
Jeonghun Ku, Youn Joo Kang
Brain Neurorehabil. 2018;11(1):.    doi: 10.12786/bn.2018.11.e5.


Reference

1. Damasio AR, Damasio H, Chui HC. Neglect following damage to frontal lobe or basal ganglia. Neuropsychologia. 1980; 18:123–132. PMID: 7383304.
Article
2. Heilman KM, Valenstein E. Frontal lobe neglect in man. Neurology. 1998; 50:1202–1207. PMID: 9595960.
Article
3. Watson RT, Valenstein E, Heilman KM. Thalamic neglect. Possible role of the medial thalamus and nucleus reticularis in behavior. Arch Neurol. 1981; 38:501–506. PMID: 7247787.
4. Chen Sea MJ, Henderson A, Cermak SA. Patterns of visual spatial inattention and their functional significance in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993; 74:355–360. PMID: 8466416.
5. Denes G, Semenza C, Stoppa E, Lis A. Unilateral spatial neglect and recovery from hemiplegia: a follow-up study. Brain. 1982; 105:543–552. PMID: 7104665.
6. van Nes IJ, van der Linden S, Hendricks HT, van Kuijk AA, Rulkens M, Verhagen WI, Geurts AC. Is visuospatial hemineglect really a determinant of postural control following stroke? An acute-phase study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009; 23:609–614. PMID: 19118129.
Article
7. van Nes IJ, van Kessel ME, Schils F, Fasotti L, Geurts AC, Kwakkel G. Is visuospatial hemineglect longitudinally associated with postural imbalance in the postacute phase of stroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009; 23:819–824. PMID: 19465506.
Article
8. Tsirlin I, Dupierrix E, Chokron S, Coquillart S, Ohlmann T. Uses of virtual reality for diagnosis, rehabilitation and study of unilateral spatial neglect: review and analysis. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2009; 12:175–181. PMID: 19361298.
Article
9. Luaute J, Halligan P, Rode G, Jacquin-Courtois S, Boisson D. Prism adaptation first among equals in alleviating left neglect: a review. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2006; 24:409–418. PMID: 17119314.
10. Beis JM, Andre JM, Baumgarten A, Challier B. Eye patching in unilateral spatial neglect: efficacy of two methods. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80:71–76. PMID: 9915375.
Article
11. Schindler I, Kerkhoff G, Karnath HO, Keller I, Goldenberg G. Neck muscle vibration induces lasting recovery in spatial neglect. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002; 73:412–419. PMID: 12235310.
Article
12. Kim DY, Lee JH, Park CI, Kim YW, Chang WH, Kim IY, Kim SI, Chon J, Chang HJ. Assessment of post-stroke unilateral spatial neglect using 3-dimensional virtual reality program. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med. 2005; 29:1–8.
13. Klinger E, Bouchard S, Legeron P, Roy S, Lauer F, Chemin I, Nugues P. Virtual reality therapy versus cognitive behavior therapy for social phobia: a preliminary controlled study. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2005; 8:76–88. PMID: 15738695.
Article
14. Rizzo AA, Buckwalter JG. The status of virtual reality for the cognitive rehabilitation of persons with neurological disorders and acquired brain injury. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1997; 39:22–33. PMID: 10168917.
15. Buxbaum LJ, Palermo MA, Mastrogiovanni D, Read MS, Rosenberg-Pitonyak E, Rizzo AA, Coslett HB. Assessment of spatial attention and neglect with a virtual wheelchair navigation task. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2008; 30:650–660. PMID: 18608643.
Article
16. Castiello U, Lusher D, Burton C, Glover S, Disler P. Improving left hemispatial neglect using virtual reality. Neurology. 2004; 62:1958–1962. PMID: 15184596.
Article
17. Pierce SR, Buxbaum LJ. Treatments of unilateral spatial neglect: a review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 83:256–268. PMID: 11833032.
18. Schenkenberg T, Bradford DC, Ajax ET. Line bisection and unilateral visual neglect in patients with neurologic impairment. Neurology. 1980; 30:509–517. PMID: 7189256.
Article
19. Halligan PW, Marshall JC, Wade DT. Visuospatial neglect: underlying factors and test sensitivity. Lancet. 1989; 2:908–911. PMID: 2571823.
Article
20. Azouvi P, Olivier S, de Montety G, Samuel C, Louis-Dreyfus A, Tesio L. Behavioral assessment of unilateral spatial neglect: study of the psychometric properties of the Catherine Bergego Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84:51–57. PMID: 12589620.
21. Wallach HS, Bar-Zvi M. Virtual-reality-assisted treatment of flight phobia. Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 2007; 44:29–32. PMID: 17665808.
22. Pollak Y, Weiss PL, Rizzo AA, Weizer M, Shriki L, Shalev RS, Gross-Tsur V. The utility of a continuous performance test embedded in virtual reality in measuring ADHD-related deficits. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2009; 30:2–6. PMID: 19194324.
Article
23. Difede J, Hoffman HG. Virtual reality exposure therapy for World Trade Center Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: a case report. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2002; 5:529–535. PMID: 12556115.
Article
24. Lotan M, Yalon-Chamovitz S, Weiss PL. Improving physical fitness of individuals with intellectual and developmental disability through a virtual reality intervention program. Res Dev Disabil. 2009; 30:229–239. PMID: 18479889.
Article
25. Rose FD, Brooks BM, Rizzo AA. Virtual reality in brain damage rehabilitation: review. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2005; 8:241–271. PMID: 15971974.
Article
26. Koenig ST, Crucian GP, Dalrymple-Alford JC, Dunser A. Virtual reality rehabilitation of spatial abilities after brain damage. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009; 144:105–107. PMID: 19592742.
27. Katz N, Ring H, Naveh Y, Kizony R, Feintuch U, Weiss PL. Interactive virtual environment training for safe street crossing of right hemisphere stroke patients with unilateral spatial neglect. Disabil Rehabil. 2005; 27:1235–1243. PMID: 16298925.
Article
28. Glover S, Castiello U. Recovering space in unilateral spatial neglect: a neurological dissociation revealed by virtual reality. J Cogn Neurosci. 2006; 18:833–843. PMID: 16768381.
Full Text Links
  • ARM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr