Ann Rehabil Med.  2012 Feb;36(1):112-118. 10.5535/arm.2012.36.1.112.

Factors Affecting Test Results and Standardized Method in Quiet Standing Balance Evaluation

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 158-710, Korea. yoonreha@ewha.ac.kr

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
To identify factors affecting test results of the quiet standing balance evaluation conducted by posturography and to investigate the standardized method by comparing results according to feet width. METHOD: The study cohort consisted of 100 healthy individuals. We assessed the quiet standing balance of subjects by using 3 different methods: standing on a force plate with feet width the same as shoulder width (test 1); with feet width the same as half the shoulder width (test 2); with feet width determined by the subject's comfort (test 3). Subjects underwent each test with their eyes open and closed for 30 seconds each time. Parameters for measuring standing balance included the mean mediolateral and anteroposterior extent, speed, and the velocity moment of center of pressure (COP) movement.
RESULTS
All parameters showed better results when the subject's eyes were open rather than closed, and the mean AP extent and speed increased as the age of the subjects increased (p<0.01). However, there was no significant correlation between height and the study parameters, and no differences between men and women. Mean mediolateral extent and speed were significantly longer and faster in test 1 compared with tests 2 and 3 (p<0.01). The results of test 2 were better than the results of test 3, but the difference was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION
COP movements increased with age and when subjects closed their eyes in an evaluation of quiet standing balance conducted by posturography. Gender and height did not affect results of the test. We suggest that an appropriate method for conducting posturography is to have the subject stand on a force plate with their feet width the same as half the shoulder width, because this posture provided relatively accurate balance capacity.

Keyword

Balance; Evaluation; Method

MeSH Terms

Cohort Studies
Eye
Female
Foot
Humans
Male
Posture
Shoulder

Figure

  • Fig. 1 (A) An example of a quiet standing balance test conducted using the Good Balance Evaluator is shown. Feet width is distance between the centers of both heels. (B) Shoulder width is distance between both acromial angles.


Reference

1. Gonzales EG, Myers SJ, Edelstein JE, Lieberman JS, Downey JA. Downey and Darling's physiological basis of rehabilitation medicine. 2001. 3rd ed. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann;p. 565–566.
2. Bronstein AM, Brandt T, Woollacott M. Clinical disorders of balance posture and gait. 1996. 1st ed. London: Arnold;p. 2–3.
3. Baloh RW, Fife TD, Zwerling L, Socotch T, Jacobson K, Bell T, Beykirch K. Comparison of static and dynamic posturography in young and older normal people. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994; 42:405–412. PMID: 8144826.
Article
4. Smulders E, Weerdesteyn V, Groen BE, Duysens J, Eijsbouts A, Laan R, van Lankveld W. Efficacy of a short multidisciplinary falls prevention program for elderly persons with osteoporosis and a fall history: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010; 91:1705–1711. PMID: 21044715.
Article
5. Lim JY, Lim JY, Park JA, Oh MK, Park WB, Kang EK, Shin HI, Paik NJ. Short-term and long-term effects of integrated fall prevention program in the Korean elderly. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med. 2010; 34:451–457.
6. Nardone A, Godi M, Artuso A, Schieppati M. Balance rehabilitation by moving platform and exercises in patients with neuropathy or vestibular deficit. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010; 91:1869–1877. PMID: 21112428.
Article
7. Pajala S, Era P, Koskenvuo M, Kaprio J, Törmäkangas T, Rantanen T. Force platform balance measures as predictors of indoor and outdoor falls in community-dwelling women aged 63-76 years. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008; 63:171–178. PMID: 18314453.
Article
8. Kim CR, Chun MH, Lee GA. Assessments of balance control using tetra-ataxiametric posturography. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med. 2009; 33:429–435.
9. Sihvonen S, Sipilä S, Taskinen S, Era P. Fall incidence in frail older women after individualized visual feedback-based balance training. Gerontology. 2004; 50:411–416. PMID: 15477703.
Article
10. Panzer VP, Bandinelli S, Hallett M. Biomechanical assessment of quiet standing and changes associated with aging. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995; 76:151–157. PMID: 7848073.
Article
11. Era P, Sainio P, Koskinen S, Haavisto P, Vaara M, Aromaa A. Postural balance in a random sample of 7,979 subjects aged 30 years and over. Gerontology. 2006; 52:204–213. PMID: 16849863.
Article
12. Riley PO, Benda BJ, Gill-Body KM, Krebs DE. Phase plane analysis of stability in quiet standing. J rehabil Res Dev. 1995; 32:227–235. PMID: 8592294.
13. Matsumura BA, Ambrose AF. Balance in the elderly. Clin Geriatr Med. 2006; 22:395–412. PMID: 16627085.
Article
14. Konrad HR, Girardi M, Helfert R. Balance and aging. Laryngoscope. 1999; 109:1454–1460. PMID: 10499055.
Article
15. Benvenuti F, Mecacci R, Gineprari I, Bandinelli S, Benvenuti E, Ferrucci L, Baroni A, Rabuffetti M, Hallett M, Dambrosia JM, et al. Kinematic characteristics of standing disequilibrium: reliability and validity of a posturographic protocol. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80:278–287. PMID: 10084435.
Article
16. Shumway-Cook A, Horak FB. Rehabilitation strategies for patients with vestibular deficits. Neurol Clin. 1990; 8:441–457. PMID: 2193221.
Article
17. Loram ID, Lakie M. Human balancing of an inverted penundulum: position control by small, ballistic-like, throw and catch movements. J physiol. 2002; 540:1111–1124. PMID: 11986396.
18. Rogers MW, Mille ML. Lateral stability and falls in older people. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2003; 31:182–187. PMID: 14571957.
Article
19. Herdman SJ, Schubert MC, Tusa RJ. Strategies for balance rehabilitation: fall risk and treatment. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001; 942:394–412. PMID: 11710480.
20. Whipple R, Wolfson L, Derby C, Singh D, Tobin J. Altered sensory function and balance in older persons. J Gerontol. 1993; 48:71–76. PMID: 8409244.
21. Rosenhall U. Degenerative patterns in the aging human vestibular neuro-epithelia. Acta Otolaryngol. 1973; 76:208–220. PMID: 4543916.
Article
22. Harwood RH. Visual problems and falls. Age Ageing. 2001; 30:13–18. PMID: 11769782.
Article
23. Verghese J, Bieri PL, Gellido C, Schaumburg HH, Herskovitz S. Peripheral neuropathy in young-old and old-old patients. Muscle Nerve. 2001; 24:1476–1481. PMID: 11745949.
Article
24. Woollacott M, Inglin B, Manchester D. Response preparation and posture control. Neuromuscular changes in the older adult. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1988; 515:42–53. PMID: 3364898.
Article
25. Wolfson L, Whipple R, Derby CA, Amerman P, Nashner L. Gender differences in the balance of healthy elderly as demonstrated by dynamic posturography. J Gerontol. 1994; 49:M160–M167. PMID: 8014390.
Article
26. Røgind H, Lykkegaard JJ, Bliddal H, Danneskiold-Samsøe B. Postural sway in normal subjects aged 20-70 years. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2003; 23:171–176. PMID: 12752561.
Full Text Links
  • ARM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr