Ann Dermatol.  2015 Apr;27(2):171-177. 10.5021/ad.2015.27.2.171.

Analysis of the Results from the Patch Test to Para-Phenylenediamine in the TRUE Test in Patients with a Hair Dye Contact Allergy

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Dermatology, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. kim937121@naver.com

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Para-phenylenediamine (PPD) is the primary patch test screening agent for hair dye contact allergy (HDCA). However, no recent studies have been published that describe the results of reactions to patch tests using PPD and hair dyes in Korea.
OBJECTIVE
To analyze the results of the patch tests to PPD using the thin-layer rapid use epicutaneous (TRUE) Test system in patients with HDCA and to investigate patients' awareness that hair dyes contains allergens, which cause the development of HDCA.
METHODS
Eighty-four patients with suspected HDCA (32 men and 52 women) underwent patch testing using the TRUE Test system and their own hair dyes. The patients' demographic data, behavior associated with hair dyeing, and clinical manifestations of HDCA were examined retrospectively.
RESULTS
Positive patch-test reactions to hair dyes occurred in 53.6% of patients who used hair dyes, and they were diagnosed with HDCA. Although there was a significant correlation between HDCA and PPD sensitization (p=0.001), only 40% of the patients with HDCA showed positive reactions to PPD. Of the 45 patients diagnosed with HDCA, only 7 (15.6%) were aware that their hair dyes contained allergens that caused HDCA.
CONCLUSION
This study's findings show that PPD is an effective HDCA marker. However, we propose that investigations on hair dye components other than PPD should be conducted to develop and validate additional predictive HDCA markers.

Keyword

Contact allergy; Hair dye; 4-phenylenediamine; Patch test

MeSH Terms

Allergens
Hair Dyes
Hair*
Humans
Hypersensitivity*
Korea
Male
Mass Screening
Patch Tests*
Retrospective Studies
Allergens
Hair Dyes

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Patch-test readings after 96 hours. (A) Positive reactions to two different types of hair dye components (para-phenylenediamine [PPD] and urushiol) are shown in patient 1. (B) Positive reactions to three different types of hair dye components and PPD are shown in patient 2. Doubtful reactions to nickel and chrome are also shown.

  • Fig. 2 The locations of skin lesions in patients with a hair dye contact allergy.

  • Fig. 3 Clinical symptoms associated with skin lesions in patients with a hair dye contact allergy.


Cited by  1 articles

P-Phenylenediamine Hair Dye Allergy and Its Clinical Characteristics
Ju Hee Han, Hyun Ji Lee, Chul Hwan Bang, Ji Hyun Lee, Young Min Park, Jun Young Lee
Ann Dermatol. 2018;30(3):316-321.    doi: 10.5021/ad.2018.30.3.316.


Reference

1. Thyssen JP, White JM. European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Epidemiological data on consumer allergy to p-phenylenediamine. Contact Dermatitis. 2008; 59:327–343.
2. Malvestio A, Bovenzi M, Hoteit M, Belloni Fortina A, Peserico A, Corradin MT, et al. p-Phenylenediamine sensitization and occupation. Contact Dermatitis. 2011; 64:37–42.
Article
3. Lee GY, Kim JK, Kim KJ. A study of the results of patch test in patients with contact dermatitis. Korean J Dermatol. 2007; 45:908–914.
4. Patel S, Basketter DA, Jefferies D, White IR, Rycroft RJ, McFadden JP, et al. Patch test frequency to p-phenylenediamine: follow up over the last 6 years. Contact Dermatitis. 2007; 56:35–37.
Article
5. Orton D, Basketter D. Hair dye sensitivity testing: a critical commentary. Contact Dermatitis. 2012; 66:312–316.
Article
6. Søsted H, Rastogi SC, Andersen KE, Johansen JD, Menné T. Hair dye contact allergy: quantitative exposure assessment of selected products and clinical cases. Contact Dermatitis. 2004; 50:344–348.
Article
7. Søsted H, Agner T, Andersen KE, Menné T. 55 cases of allergic reactions to hair dye: a descriptive, consumer complaint-based study. Contact Dermatitis. 2002; 47:299–303.
Article
8. Hong YJ, Choi HY, Kim KJ, Lee GY, Kim DW, Kim SJ, et al. TRUE test in patients with contact dermatitis: a multicenter study. Korean J Dermatol. 2011; 49:661–669.
9. Kim JE, Jung HD, Kang H. A survey of the awareness, knowledge and behavior of hair dye use in a Korean population with gray hair. Ann Dermatol. 2012; 24:274–279.
Article
10. Ha BJ, Jeon DW, Kim KS. A study on the physico-chemical property evaluation of oxidative permanet hair color products containing p-phenylene diamine. J Fash Bus. 2005; 9:136–144.
11. Yazar K, Boman A, Lidén C. Potent skin sensitizers in oxidative hair dye products on the Swedish market. Contact Dermatitis. 2009; 61:269–275.
Article
12. Søsted H, Hesse U, Menné T, Andersen KE, Johansen JD. Contact dermatitis to hair dyes in a Danish adult population: an interview-based study. Br J Dermatol. 2005; 153:132–135.
Article
13. Pot LM, Scheitza SM, Coenraads PJ, Blömeke B. Penetration and haptenation of p-phenylenediamine. Contact Dermatitis. 2013; 68:193–207.
14. Handa S, De D, Mahajan R. Epidemiological trends in contact dermatitis to hair dye: Comparing para-phenylenediamine positivity after a decade long interval. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2011; 77:511–512.
Article
15. Sosted H, Johansen JD, Andersen KE, Menné T. Severe allergic hair dye reactions in 8 children. Contact Dermatitis. 2006; 54:87–91.
Article
16. Almeida PJ, Borrego L, Limiñana JM. Age-related sensitization to p-phenylenediamine. Contact Dermatitis. 20111; 64:172–174.
Article
17. Chung WH, Wang CM, Hong HS. Allergic contact dermatitis to temporary tattoos with positive para-phenylenediamine reactions: report of four cases. Int J Dermatol. 2001; 40:754–756.
Article
18. Pegas JR, Criado PR, Criado RF, Vasconcellos C, Pires MC. Allergic contact dermatitis to temporary tattoo by p-phenylenediamine. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2002; 12:62–64.
19. Søsted H, Basketter DA, Estrada E, Johansen JD, Patlewicz GY. Ranking of hair dye substances according to predicted sensitization potency: quantitative structure-activity relationships. Contact Dermatitis. 2004; 51:241–254.
Article
20. Søsted H, Rustemeyer T, Gonçalo M, Bruze M, Goossens A, Giménez-Arnau AM, et al. Contact allergy to common ingredients in hair dyes. Contact Dermatitis. 2013; 69:32–39.
Article
21. Wolf R, Orion E, Ruocco V, Baroni A, Ruocco E. Patch testing: facts and controversies. Clin Dermatol. 2013; 31:479–486.
Article
22. Geier J, Ballmer-Weber BK, Dickel H, Frosch PJ, Bircher A, Weisshaar E, et al. Monitoring contact sensitization to p-phenylenediamine (PPD) by patch testing with PPD 0.3% in petrolatum. Contact Dermatitis. 2013; 69:26–31.
Article
23. Spornraft-Ragaller P, Kämmerer E, Gillitzer C, Schmitt J. Severe allergic reactions to para-phenylenediamine in children and adolescents: should the patch test concentration of PPD be changed? J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2012; 10:258–264.
Article
24. Goebel C, Coenraads PJ, Rothe H, Kunze G, Kock M, Schlatter H, et al. Elicitation of the immune response to p-phenylenediamine in allergic patients: the role of dose and exposure time. Br J Dermatol. 2010; 163:1205–1211.
Article
25. Ho SG, Basketter DA, Jefferies D, Rycroft RJ, White IR, McFadden JP. Analysis of para-phenylenediamine allergic patients in relation to strength of patch test reaction. Br J Dermatol. 2005; 153:364–367.
Article
Full Text Links
  • AD
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr