Korean J Obstet Gynecol.  2000 Feb;43(2):254-259.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes according to the Catheters undergoing Intrauterine Insemination

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
To compare the clinical outcomes of intrauterine insemination (IUI) according to the catheter used. MATERIALS AND METHOD: From March 1998 to September 1998, total 95 infertile patients were included in this study. Patients were randomly allocated to TomCat group (n = 39) and Mackler group (n = 56) according to the catheter for insemination. The controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) using luteal long protocol of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) was used in all patients. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-test, Fisher's exact test, and x2 test as appropriate. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.
RESULTS
The total dose and duration of exogeneous gonadotropin required were similar between the two groups. There were also no significant differences in serum estradiol (E2) level, endometrial thickness and texture on the day of hCG administration between the two groups. However, the percentage of uterine souding due to failure of initial approach was significantly higher in TomCat group compared to Mackler group (23.1% vs. 0%, p < 0.01). The percentage of bleeding after IUI in TomCat group seemed to be higher than that in Mackler group (15.4% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.06), although there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. There was also no significant difference in the clinical pregnancy rate per patient between the two groups.
CONCLUSION
These results suggested that using Mackler catheter might be effective for IUI, especially for the patients with cervical factor infertility.

Keyword

Intrauterine insemination (IUI); TomCat catheter; Mackler catheter; Clinical outcome; TomCat; Mackler

MeSH Terms

Catheters*
Estradiol
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone
Gonadotropins
Hemorrhage
Humans
Infertility
Insemination*
Pregnancy Rate
Estradiol
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone
Gonadotropins
Full Text Links
  • KJOG
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr