Korean J Dermatol.
2006 Jun;44(6):659-663.
Report from ADRG: A Study on the Diagnostic Criteria of Korean Atopic Dermatitis
- Affiliations
-
- 1Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Seoul, Korea. ylpark@schbc.ac.kr
- 2Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
- 3Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.
- 4Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
- 5Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea.
- 6Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Seoul, Korea.
- 7Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
- 8Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, Dongguk University, Seoul, Korea.
- 9Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Korea.
Abstract
- BACKGROUND
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, relapsing inflammatory skin disease with genetic and environmental background. The diagnosis of AD depends on the clinical presentation and history because there are no objective laboratory tests. The criteria established by Hanifin and Rajka have become the standard for the clinical diagnosis of AD (Until now, we used conventional Hanifin and Rajka's diagnostic guidelines). But diagnostic criteria for Korean have not been studied yet.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of the present study was to establish the diagnostic criteria of Korean AD.
METHODS
We made out a draft for diagnostic criteria for Korean on the basis of the Hanifin and Rajka's guidelines and published Korean journals. And we established the diagnostic criteria for Korean after collecting extensive opinions from dermatologic specialists in many university hospitals.
RESULTS
The major criteria of AD is similar to conventional diagnosic criteria, but three additional minor features (periauricular eczema, scalp scale, skin prick test reactivity) were significant for the diagnosis of AD in Korean patients. The other eleven minor features of the conventional minor diagnostic features were also significant.
CONCLUSION
We established Korean diagnostic criteria for AD. Our result suggest that ethnic backgrounds influence the phenotype of AD and that additional three features need to be included in the Korean diagnostic criteria. Continued refinement of these guidelines will facilitate diagnosis in specific ethnic populations and in specific subgroups of patients.
