Korean J Health Promot.  2016 Mar;16(1):11-19. 10.15384/kjhp.2016.16.1.11.

The Impact of a Spouse's Depression on Family Functioning and Communication

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Family Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. youngkim@amc.seoul.kr
  • 2Department of Psychiatry, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Family Medicine, Vievis Namuh Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Department of Family Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 5Department of Family Medicine, Eulji University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.
  • 6Department of Family Medicine, Catholic Kwandong University International St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 7Department of Child Development and Family Studies, Institute of Human Ecology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Depression is known to affect family function and communication. However, the distress experienced by those who have spouse with depression has not been properly assessed to date. This study attempted to examine the effect of depression on family function and communication as reported by the spouses of the depressed patients.
METHODS
The participants of this study were 445 couples who visited 28 family doctors from April 2009 to June 2011. The Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale III (FACES-III) was used to evaluate the family function, and the family communication scale in FACES-IV was used to evaluate communication among family members. A score of more than 21 points on the CES-D scale was used to indicate depression. The relationships between family type, family communication, and the depression of one's spouse were analyzed using the chi-square test and logistic regression.
RESULTS
The odds ratios, indicating how the family is heading towards an extreme level, were statistically significant in all male and female respondents (male: odds ratio [OR] 3.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.73-5.48; female: OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.02-4.27). On the other hand, only female respondents with depressed spouses reported their family communication not to be good (male: OR 1.65, 95% CI 0.88-3.07; female: OR 2.48, 95% CI, 1.25-4.93).
CONCLUSIONS
This study revealed people perceive their family function and communication not good when they have spouses with depression. There was no gender difference in the evaluation of their family function, but the perception on their family communication were different by gender.

Keyword

Depression; Spouses; Family functioning; Commuincation

MeSH Terms

Surveys and Questionnaires
Depression*
Family Characteristics
Female
Hand
Head
Humans
Logistic Models
Male
Odds Ratio
Spouses

Reference

References

1. World Health Organization. Pharmacological treatment of mental disorders in primary health care. Geneva: World Health Organization;2009.
2. Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare. The epidemiological survey of mental disorder in Korea 2011. Seoul: Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare;2012.
3. Friedmann MS, McDermut WH, Solomon DA, Ryan CE, Keitner GI, Miller IW. Family functioning and mental illness: a comparison of psychiatric and nonclinical families. Fam Process. 1997; 36(4):357–67.
Article
4. McNabb R. Family function and depression. J Fam Pract. 1983; 16(1):169–70.
5. Gotlib IH, Whiffen VE. Depression and marital functioning: an examination of specificity and gender differences. J Abnorm Psychol. 1989; 98(1):23–30.
Article
6. Hautzinger M, Linden M, Hoffman N. Distressed couples with and without a depressed partner: an analysis of their verbal interaction. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1982; 13(4):307–14.
Article
7. Jacob T, Leonard K. Sequential analysis of marital interactions involving alcoholic, depressed, and nondistressed men. J Abnorm Psychol. 1992; 101(4):647–56.
Article
8. Johnson SL, Jacob T. Marital interactions of depressed men and women. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1997; 65(1):15–23.
Article
9. McCabe SB, Gotlib IH. Interactions of couples with and without a depressed spouse: Self-report and observations of problem-solving situations. J Soc Pers Relat. 1993; 10(4):589–99.
Article
10. Beach SRH. Marital and family processes in depression: a scientific foundation for clinical practice. Washington: American Psychological Association;2001. p. 205–24.
11. Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003; 195:3508–1381.
12. Cho MJ, Kim KH. Diagnostic validity of the CES-D (Korean version) in the assessment of DSM-III-R major depression. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 1993; 3(3):)2:. 381–99.
13. Lim JH, Lee KR, Oh MK, Kwak KW, Yoon BB. A study of reliability and validity of FACES III. J Korean Acad Fam Med. 1990; 11(10):8–17.
14. Olson DH, Sprenkle DH, Russell CS. Circumplex model of marital and family systems: I. Cohesion and adaptability dimensions, family types, and clinical applications. Fam Process. 1979; 18(1):3–28.
Article
15. Olson DH, Barnes H. Family communication. Minneapolis: LIFE INNOVATIONS, Inc. 2012. [Accessed August 29, 2014].http://facesiv.com/pdf/4.communication.pdf. 2012.
16. Kim YS, Sunwoo S, Kim B, Park HK, Ok SW, Cha D. Reliability and validity of family communication scale in the FACES IV package: Korean version. J Korean Fam Relat Assoc. 2012; 17:241–58.
17. Kim DH, Lim YS, Kwak KW, Lee HR, Young BB. A comparative study between depression and family function in family practice. Korean J Fam Med. 1990; 11:23–8.
18. Herr NR, Hammen C, Brennan PA. Current and past depression as predictors of family functioning: a comparison of men and women in a community sample. J Fam Psychol. 2007; 21(4):694–702.
Article
19. Koyama A, Akiyama T, Miyake Y, Kurita H. Family functioning perceived by patients and their family members in three Diagnostic and Statistical Manual‐IV diagnostic groups. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2004; 58(5):495–500.
Article
20. Weinstock LM, Keitner GI, Ryan CE, Solomon DA, Miller IW. Family functioning and mood disorders: a comparison between patients with major depressive disorder and bipolar I disorder. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006; 74(6):1192–202.
Article
21. Benazon NR, Coyne JC. Living with a depressed spouse. J Fam Psychol. 2000; 14(1):71–9.
Article
22. Fincham FD, Beach SR, Harold GT, Osborne LN. Marital satisfaction and depression: different causal relationships for men and women? Psychol Sci. 1997; 8(5):351–6.
Article
23. Wilhelm K, Roy K, Mitchell P, Brownhill S, Parker G. Gender differences in depression risk and coping factors in a clinical sample. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2002; 106(1):45–53.
Article
24. Dindia K, Allen M. Sex differences in self-disclosure: a metaanalysis. Psychol Bull. 1992; 112(1):106–24.
Article
25. Christensen A, Heavey CL. Gender and social structure in the demand/withdraw pattern of marital conflict. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990; 59(1):73–81.
Article
26. Johnson SL, Jacob T. Sequential interactions in the marital communication of depressed men and women. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000; 68(1):4–12.
Article
27. Bradbury TN, Fincham FD. Attributions in marriage: review and critique. Psychol Bull. 1990; 107(1):3–33.
Article
28. Radloff LS. The CES-D scale a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977; 1(3):385–401.
29. Weissman MM, Sholomskas D, Pottenger M, Prusoff BA, Locke BZ. Assessing depressive symptoms in five psychiatric populations: a validation study. Am J Epidemiol. 1977; 106(3):203–14.
Article
30. Whisman MA, Bruce ML. Marital dissatisfaction and incidence of major depressive episode in a community sample. J Abnorm Psychol. 1999; 108(4):674–8.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJHP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr