Korean J Anat.
2006 Jun;39(3):197-204.
Study on the Differences of Anatomical Terminologies between Korean Association of Anatomists and Korean Association of Biological Sciences
- Affiliations
-
- 1Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Medicine-gifted Education Institute, Kangwon National University, Korea. insitu@kangwon.ac.kr
Abstract
-
A number of Korean terminologies describing same anatomical structures have been found different
between biological and medical fields. These differences can make scientific miscommunication in biomedical fields.
So we investigated and analyzed the official Korean biological terminologies (2005), and compared them with Korean
anatomical terminologies (2005).
Of all Korean biological terminologies, 791 were founded to describe anatomical structures. And concordance rate
of 791 biological terminologies with Korean anatomical terminologies was 37.4%, which is significantly lower than
that of high school biology terminologies with anatomical terminology (50.3+/-2.7%). This difference in concordance
rates is thought to result mainly from the fact that many Sino-Korean terminologies and eponyms are used in
biological field.
Above results can be served as valuable basic resources for revision and standardization of terminologies used in
biomedical fields. Collaboration among anatomists, biologists, and college students is thought to be prerequisite.