J Korean Ophthalmol Soc.  2011 Jun;52(6):665-670. 10.3341/jkos.2011.52.6.665.

Factors Associated with Incomplete Cleavage of the Corneal Epithelium in Alcohol-Assisted LASEK

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. khjinmd@khmc.or.kr
  • 2Department of Ophthalmology, Konkuk University Chungju Hospital, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Chungju, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
To evaluate the factors associated with unsuccessful cleavage of corneal epithelium in alcohol-assisted LASEK.
METHODS
A total of 274 eyes in 137 patients who had received alcohol-assisted LASEK were enrolled in the present study. Associations of central corneal thickness, refractive error, pre-operative corneal curvature, ablation depth, anterior chamber volume and depth, and history of wearing contact lenses with epithelial cleavage were investigated.
RESULTS
Complete epithelial cleavage was achieved in 198 eyes (72.3%) and incomplete epithelial cleavage in 76 eyes (27.7%). A history of wearing contact lenses (p = 0.018), continuous use of contact lenses (p = 0.034), longer use of contact lenses (p = 0.000), anterior chamber volume (p = 0.012) and depth (p = 0.012) were significantly associated with incomplete epithelial cleavage.
CONCLUSIONS
Alcohol-assisted LASEK may cause problems in patients who experience continuous use of contact lenses and longer use of contact lenses. Patients with incomplete epithelial cleavage have small anterior chamber volume and shallow anterior chamber depth.

Keyword

Contact lenses; Epithelial cleavage; Epithelial flap; LASEK

MeSH Terms

Anterior Chamber
Contact Lenses
Epithelium, Corneal
Eye
Humans
Keratectomy, Subepithelial, Laser-Assisted
Refractive Errors

Reference

References

1. Trokel SL, Srinivasan R, Braren B. Excimer laser surgery of the cornea. Am J Ophthalmol. 1983; 96:710–5.
Article
2. Seiler T, Holschbach A, Derse M, et al. Complications of myopic photorefractive keratectomy with the excimer laser. Ophthalmology. 1994; 101:153–60.
Article
3. Gartry DS, Kerr Muir MG, Marshall J. Excimer laser photo-refractive keratectomy. 18-month follow-up. Ophthalmology. 1992; 99:1209–19.
4. Seiler T, Wollensak J. Myopic photorefractive keratectomy with the excimer laser. One-year follow-up. Ophthalmology. 1991; 98:1156–63.
5. Wang Z, Chen J, Yang B. Comparison of laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy to correct myopia from −1.25 to −6.00 diopters. J Refract Surg. 1997; 13:528–34.
Article
6. Shah S, Sebai Sarhan AR, Doyle SJ, et al. The epithelial flap for photorefractive keratectomy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001; 85:393–6.
Article
7. Pallikaris IG, Papatzanaki ME, Stathi EZ, et al. Laser in situ keratomileusis. Lasers Surg Med. 1990; 10:463–8.
Article
8. Haft P, Yoo SH, Kymionis GD, et al. Complications of LASIK flaps made by the IntraLase 15- and 30-kHz femtosecond lasers. J Refract Surg. 2009; 25:979–84.
Article
9. Ito M, Hori-Komai Y, Toda I, Tsubota K. Risk factors and retreatment results of intraoperative flap complications in LASIK. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004; 30:1240–7.
Article
10. Cimberle U, Camellin M. LASEK may offer the advantages of both LASIK and PRK. Ocular Surgery News International. 1999; 10:14–5.
11. Azar DT, Taneri S, Chen CC. Laser sub-epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) review and clinicopathological correlations. MEJO. 2002; 10:54–9.
12. Choi CY, Kim JY, Kim MJ, Tchah H. Transmission electron microscopy study of corneal epithelial flaps following removal using mechanical scraping, alcohol, and epikeratome techniques. J Refract Surg. 2008; 24:667–70.
Article
13. Taneri S, Zieske JD, Azar DT. Evolution, techniques, clinical outcomes, and pathophysiology of LASEK: review of the literature. Surv Ophthalmol. 2004; 49:576–602.
Article
14. Claringbold TV 2nd. Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for the correction of myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002; 28:18–22.
Article
15. Kim SY, Sah WJ, Lim YW, Hahn TW. Twenty percent alcohol tox-icity on rabbit corneal epithelial cells: electron microscopic study. Cornea. 2002; 21:388–92.
16. Azar DT, Ang RT, Lee JB, et al. Laser subepithelial keratomileusis: electron microscopy and visual outcomes of flap photo-refractive keratectomy. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2001; 12:323–8.
Article
17. Camellin M, Cimberle M. LASEK technique promising after 1 year of experience. Ocul Surg News. 2000; 18:14–7.
18. Vinciguerra P, Camesasca FI. Butterfly laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia. J Refract Surg. 2002; 18:S371–3.
Article
19. Al-Swailem SA, Wagoner MD. Complications and visual outcome of LASIK performed by anterior segment fellows vs experienced faculty supervisors. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006; 141:13–23.
Article
20. Choi SK, Kim JH, Lee D, et al. Different epithelial cleavage planes produced by various epikeratomes in epithelial laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008; 34:2079–84.
Article
21. Kim KH, Kim JH, Song JS, Kim HM. Factors associated with the successful separation of corneal epithelium in epi-LASIK. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2007; 48:1623–9.
Article
22. Zhou X, Wu L, Dai J, Zhu R. The epithelial-flap abnormality of laser epithelial keratomileusis. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2002; 38:69–71.
23. Abad JC, An B, Power WJ, et al. A prospective evaluation of alco-hol-assisted versus mechanical epithelial removal before photo-refractive keratectomy. Ophthalmology. 1997; 104:1566–74.
Article
24. Abad JC, Talamo JH, Vidaurri-Leal J, et al. Dilute ethanol versus mechanical debridement before photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996; 22:1427–33.
Article
25. Browning AC, Shah S, Dua HS, et al. Alcohol debridement of the corneal epithelium in PRK and LASEK: an electron microscopic study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003; 44:510–3.
Article
26. Espana EM, Grueterich M, Mateo A, et al. Cleavage of corneal basement membrane components by ethanol exposure in laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003; 29:1192–7.
Article
27. Carones F, Fiore T, Brancato R. Mechanical vs. alcohol epithelial removal during photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg. 1999; 15:556–62.
28. Chen CC, Chang JH, Lee JB, et al. Human corneal epithelial cell viability and morphology after dilute alcohol exposure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002; 43:2593–602.
29. Kim TI, Tchah H, Cho EH, Kook MS. Evaluation for safety of cultured corneal fibroblasts with cotreatment of alcohol and mitomycin C. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004; 45:86–92.
Article
30. Kim SY, Sah WJ, Lim YW, Hahn TW. Twenty percent alcohol tox-icity on rabbit corneal epithelial cells: electron microscopic study. Cornea. 2002; 21:388–92.
31. Lee JB, Seong GJ, Lee JH, et al. Comparison of laser epithelial keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for low to moderate myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001; 27:565–70.
Article
32. Pallikaris IG, Kalyvianaki MI, Katsanevaki VJ, Ginis HS. Epi-LASIK: preliminary clinical results of an alternative surface ablation procedure. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005; 31:879–85.
Article
33. Pallikaris IG, Naoumidi II, Kalyvianaki MI, Katsanevaki VJ. Epi-LASIK: comparative histological evaluation of mechanical and alcohol-assisted epithelial separation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003; 29:1496–501.
Article
34. Pallikaris IG, Katsanevaki VJ, Kalyvianaki MI, Naoumidi II. Advances in subepithelial excimer refractive surgery techniques: Epi-LASIK. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2003; 14:207–12.
Article
35. O'Doherty M, Kirwan C, O'Keeffe M, O'Doherty J. Postoperative pain following epi-LASIK, LASEK, and PRK for myopia. J Refract Surg. 2007; 23:133–8.
36. Torres LF, Sancho C, Tan B, et al. Early postoperative pain following Epi-LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy: a prospective, comparative, bilateral study. J Refract Surg. 2007; 23:126–32.
Article
37. Liu XQ, Xu L, Yi CJ. Flap removal or flap preservation during LASEK surgery. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2010; 57:45–8.
Article
38. Kim SK, Song JS, Kim HM. Postoperative pain and epithelial wound healing in epi-LASIK with and without an epithelial sheet preservation. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2008; 49:1894–900.
Article
39. Holden BA, Sweeney DF, Vannas A, et al. Effects of long-term extended contact lens wear on the human cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1985; 26:1489–501.
40. Vannas A, Holden BA, Makitie J. The ultrastructure of contact lens induced changes. Acta Ophthalmol. 1984; 62:320–33.
Article
41. Bourne WM, Hodge DO, McLaren JW. Estimation of corneal endothelial pump function in long-term contact lens wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999; 40:603–11.
42. Wilson SE. LASIK: management of common complications. Laser in situ keratomileusis. Cornea. 1998; 17:459–67.
Full Text Links
  • JKOS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr