J Korean Ophthalmol Soc.  2015 Oct;56(10):1591-1598. 10.3341/jkos.2015.56.10.1591.

Variability of Preoperative Angle of Deviation Measured on the Day of Surgery in Intermittent Exotropia

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea. Mingming8@naver.com

Abstract

PURPOSE
To evaluate the characteristics and surgical outcomes of children with intermittent exotropia whose preoperative angle of deviation changed on the day of surgery.
METHODS
The medical records of 323 children with intermittent exotropia who underwent lateral rectus recession in both eyes were reviewed. The records were classified according to the difference of 8 prism diopters (PD) or more between the largest angle of deviation measured within 3 months prior to the operation and that on the day of surgery into the increased, same, or decreased groups. The frequency, characteristics, and surgical outcomes of each group were analyzed. The surgical amount was determined based on the largest angle of deviation measured at distance within 3 months before surgery.
RESULTS
The angle of deviation at distance on the day of surgery was increased in 5 patients (1.5%) and decreased in 6 (1.9%). The near angle was increased in 19 (5.9%) and decreased in 22 (6.8%) patients. The groups in which distant deviation was changed had a greater distant angle and more patients with anisometropia. The group in which near deviation decreased was older than the same group and 81.8% of the patients were school-aged. In the group with changes in either distant or near deviation, the angle on the day of surgery changed toward decreasing disparity of near-distant deviation. On the last follow-up, the rate of overcorrection of 10 PD or more was 13.6% in the decreased near deviation group, which was significantly high (p = 0.039).
CONCLUSIONS
The angle of deviation on the day of surgery could be different compared to the largest preoperative angle in some patients with intermittent exotropia. In patients with decreased near deviation, the rate of postoperative overcorrection might be high.

Keyword

Angle of deviation; Day of surgery; Intermittent exotropia; Surgical outcome

MeSH Terms

Anisometropia
Child
Exotropia*
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Medical Records

Figure

  • Figure 1. Bland-Altman plot for the change in angle of deviation on the day of surgery according to the largest preoperative angle (A) at distance ( p = 0.662, linear regression analysis) and (B) at near ( p < 0.001, linear regression analysis). PD = prism diopters.

  • Figure 2. Bland-Altman plot for the change in angle of deviation on the day of surgery according to the preoperative disparity be-tween distant and near angle; (A) change in distant angle ( p = 0.046, linear regression analysis) and (B) change in near angle ( p < 0.041, linear regression analysis). PD = prism diopters.


Cited by  1 articles

Changes in the Effects of Bilateral Lateral Rectus Muscle Recession According to Preoperative Angle Deviation
Sung Ha Hwang, Hae Jung Paik
J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2020;61(3):281-287.    doi: 10.3341/jkos.2020.61.3.281.


Reference

References

1. Rah SH, Jun HS, Kim SH. An epidemiologic survey of strabismus among school-children in Korea. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1997; 38:2195–9.
2. Pratt-Johnson JA, Barlow JM, Tillson G. Early surgery in inter-mittent exotropia. Am J Ophthalmol. 1977; 84:689–94.
Article
3. Hardesty HH, Boynton JR, Keenan JP. Treatment of intermittent exotropia. Arch Ophthalmol. 1978; 96:268–74.
Article
4. Richard JM, Parks MM. Intermittent exotropia. Surgical results in different age groups. Ophthalmology. 1983; 90:1172–7.
5. Kushner BJ. Selective surgery for intermittent exotropia based on distant/near differences. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998; 116:324–8.
6. Ing MR, Nishimura J, Okino L. Outcome study of bilateral lateral rectus recession for intermittent exotropia in children. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1999; 30:110–7.
Article
7. Chang BL. Operative results in exotropia. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1983; 24:729–34.
8. Kim MM, Cho ST. Long-term surgical results of intermittent exotropia. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1994; 35:1321–6.
9. Ko KH, Min BM. Factors related to surgical results of intermittent exotropia. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1996; 37:179–84.
10. Scott WE, Keech R, Mash AJ. The postoperative results and stabil-ity of exodeviations. Arch Ophthalmol. 1981; 99:1814–8.
Article
11. Clarke WN, Noel LP. Surgical results in intermittent exotropia. Can J Ophthalmol. 1981; 16:66–9.
12. Pritchard C. Intermittent exotropia: how do they "turn out"? Richard G. Scobee Memorial Lecture. Am Orthopt J. 1993; 43:60–6.
13. Kim C, Hwang JM. ‘Largest angle to target’ in surgery for inter-mittent exotropia. Eye (Lond). 2005; 19:637–42.
Article
14. Son JH, Huh YS, Kim MM. Surgical outcomes of intermittent exo-tropia as a function of strabismic angle. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2006; 20:230–3.
Article
15. Hatt SR, Leske DA, Liebermann L. . Variability of angle of de-viation measurements in children with intermittent exotropia. J AAPOS. 2012; 16:120–4.
Article
16. Von Noorden GK, Campos EC. Binocular vision and ocular mo-tility: theory and management of strabismus. 6th. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book;2002. p. 367–8.
17. Parks MM, Mitchell PR. Concomitant Exodeviations. Tasman W, Jaeger EA, editors. Duane’s Clinical Ophthalmology. revised. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott;1998. v. 1. chap. 13.
18. Yang HK, Hwang JM. Surgical outcomes in convergence in-sufficiency-type exotropia. Ophthalmology. 2011; 118:1512–7.
Article
19. Santiago AP, Ing MR, Kushner BJ, Rosenbaum AL. Intermittent Exotropia. Rosenbaum AL, Santiago AP, editors. Clinical Strabismus Management: Principles and Surgical Techniques. 1st. Philadelphia: WB Saunders;1999. v. 1. chap. 12.
Article
20. Gezer A, Sezen F, Nasri N, Gözüm N. Factors influencing the out-come of strabismus surgery in patients with exotropia. J AAPOS. 2004; 8:56–60.
Article
21. Ron A, Merin S. The use of the pre-op prism adaptation test (PAT) in surgery of exotropia. Am Orthopt J. 1988; 38:107–10.
22. Kushner BJ. The distance angle to target in surgery for intermittent exotropia. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998; 116:189–94.
Article
23. Hatt SR, Mohney BG, Leske DA, Holmes JM. Variability of con-trol in intermittent exotropia. Ophthalmology. 2008; 115:371–6.e2.
Article
24. Cooper J, Medow N. Major review: Intermittent exotropia, basic and divergence excess type. Binocul Vis Strabismus Q. 1993; 8:185–216.
25. Campos EC, Cipolli C. Binocularity and photophobia in inter-mittent exotropia. Percept Mot Skills. 1992; 74:(3 Pt 2). 1168–70.
Article
26. Na JH, Suh YW, Cho Y. The surgical outcome of intermittent exo-tropia with type conversion subsequent to preoperative part-time occlusion therapy. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2012; 53:1669–73.
Article
27. Raab EL, Parks MM. Recession of the lateral recti. Early and late postoperative alignments. Arch Ophthalmol. 1969; 82:203–8.
28. Hatt SR, Leske DA, Mohney BG. . Fusional convergence in childhood intermittent exotropia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011; 152:314–9.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKOS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr