J Korean Ophthalmol Soc.  2009 Oct;50(10):1505-1509. 10.3341/jkos.2009.50.10.1505.

Intracorneal Ring Segment Implantation for the Management of Keratoconus: Short-Term Safety and Efficacy

Affiliations
  • 1Sungmo Eye Hospital, Busan, Korea.
  • 2St. Mary's Lasik Center, Busan, Korea. Styie1@empal.com

Abstract

PURPOSE
To assess the safety and efficacy of intracorneal ring segment (Intacs ring) implantation in managing keratoconus.
METHODS
This retrospective case series comprised of 11 keratoconic eyes (11 patients) had Intacs ring (Addition Technology, Inc, California, USA) implantation. The main outcome measures were best corrected visual acuity, refraction, keratometry, topography, and pachymetry. Patients were examined before Intacs ring implantation as well as one week, one, three, and six months postoperatively.
RESULTS
The mean best corrected visual acuity improved from 0.60+/-0.33 logMAR preoperatively to 0.39+/-0.23 logMAR six months postoperatively (p>0.05) and the mean corneal thickness, from 432.82+/-41.17 micrometer preoperatively to 448.00+/-62.27 micrometer at six months (p>0.05). The mean cylinder improved from -5.36+/-2.70D preoperatively to -2.50+/-1.66D six months postoperatively (p<0.05) and the mean keratometry, from 47.99+/-2.38D to 42.83+/-1.72D at six months (p<0.05). In addition, the mean spherical equivalent improved from -6.64+/-3.49D preoperatively to -3.66+/-3.37D six months postoperatively (p<0.05). One eye had a risk of ring exposure, but the others had no significant complications.
CONCLUSIONS
Intacs ring implantation appears to be effective in improving cylinder, spherical equivalent, and keratometry in patients with keratoconus.

Keyword

Intacs; Intracorneal ring segment; Keratoconus

MeSH Terms

California
Eye
Humans
Keratoconus
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Retrospective Studies
Visual Acuity

Cited by  2 articles

Clinical Results of Riboflavin and Ultraviolet-A-induced Corneal Cross-linking for Progressive Keratoconus in Korean Patients
Pyung Lee, Kyung Hyun Jin
J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2011;52(1):23-28.    doi: 10.3341/jkos.2011.52.1.23.

Clinical Results of Intacs® Ring Implantation in Keratoconus or Keratectasia
Ji Ah Kim, Dong Hyun Kim, Won Ryang Wee, Mee Kum Kim
J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2015;56(4):499-508.    doi: 10.3341/jkos.2015.56.4.499.


Reference

References

1. Rathi VM, Krishnamachary M, Gupta S. Cataract formation after penetrating keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997; 23:562–4.
Article
2. Ing JJ, Ing HH, Nelson LR, et al. Ten-year postoperative results of penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 1998; 105:1855–65.
Article
3. Colin J, Cochener B, Savary G, Malet F. Correcting keratoconus with intracorneal rings. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000; 26:1117–22.
Article
4. Siganos CS, Kymionis GD, Kartakis N, et al. Management of keratoconus with Intacs. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003; 135:64–70.
Article
5. Hellstedt T, Makela J, Uusitalo R, et al. Treating keratoconus with intacs corneal ring segments. J Refract Surg. 2005; 21:236–46.
Article
6. Meek KM, Tuft SJ, Huang Y, et al. Changes in collagen orientation and distribution in keratoconus corneas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005; 46:1948–56.
Article
7. Troutman RC, Gaster RN. Surgical advances and results of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 1980; 90:131–6.
Article
8. Frost NA, Wu J, Lai TF, Coster DJ. A review of randomized controlled trials of penetrating keratoplasty techniques. Ophthalmology. 2006; 113:942–9.
Article
9. Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Riboflavin/ultraviolet-a-induced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003; 135:620–7.
Article
10. Alio JL, Shabayek MH, Belda JI, et al. Analysis of results related to good and bad outcomes of Intacs implantation for keratoconus correction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006; 32:756–61.
11. Guell JL. Are intracorneal rings still useful in refractive surgery? Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2005; 16:260–5.
12. Sharma M, Boxer Wachler BS. Comparison of single-segment and double-segment Intacs for keratoconus and post-LASIK ectasia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006; 141:891–5.
Article
13. Chan SM, Khan HN. Reversibility and exchangeability of intrastromal corneal ring segments. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002; 28:676–81.
Article
14. Zare MA, Hashemi H, Salari MR. Intracorneal ring segment implantation for the management of keratoconus: safety and efficacy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007; 33:1886–91.
Article
15. Rabinowitz YS. INTACS for keratoconus. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2006; 46:91–103.
Article
16. Ratkay-Traub I, Ferincz IE, Juhasz T, et al. First clinical results with the femtosecond neodynium-glass laser in refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2003; 19:94–103.
Article
17. Coskunseven E, Kymionis GD, Tsiklis NS, et al. One-year results of intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation (KeraRing) using femtosecond laser in patients with keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008; 145:775–9.
Article
18. Kymionis GD, Siganos CS, Tsiklis NS, et al. Long-term follow-up of Intacs in keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007; 143:236–44.
Article
19. Ruckhofer J, Twa MD, Schanzlin DJ. Clinical characteristics of lamellar channel deposits after implantation of intacs. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000; 26:1473–9.
Article
20. Randleman JB, Dawson DG, Larson PM, et al. Chronic pain after Intacs implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006; 32:875–8.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKOS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr