J Korean Med Assoc.  2014 Aug;57(8):695-703. 10.5124/jkma.2014.57.8.695.

Concept of perforator flap and reconstruction using microsurgery

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hanyang University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 2Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. sw1215@catholic.ac.kr

Abstract

Free tissue transfer has revolutionized tissue reconstruction. Microvascular operation techniques using free tissue transfer make it possible to precisely restore various defects and deformities. There are various surgical flaps available for this surgery, such as muscle flaps, musculocutaneous flaps, or fasciocutaneous flaps. The development of perforator flaps enables multi-component reconstruction with reduced donor site morbidity. Successful reconstruction must be approached with the goals of not only providing stable coverage, but most importantly, of restoring function. Therefore, the selection of flaps is dependent on the recipient site characteristics and the functional and aesthetic results at both the recipient and donor sites. With the high success rate of free flaps and the popularization of the perforator flap, microvascular surgery has played a major role in various reconstructive fields.

Keyword

Perforator flap; Reconstruction; Microsurgery; Free tissue flaps

MeSH Terms

Congenital Abnormalities
Free Tissue Flaps
Humans
Microsurgery*
Myocutaneous Flap
Perforator Flap*
Surgical Flaps
Tissue Donors

Figure

  • Figure 1 (A) A 49-year-old male patient who was involved in a traffic accident, resulting in large skin defect in the lower leg with uncovered tibia and fibula fracture sites. (B) The infected lower leg was radically debrided and a negative pressure dressing was applied for 2 weeks. (C) A latissimus dorsi chimeric flap was harvested to reconstruct both medial and lateral defects of lower leg. (D) As the second stage operation, fibular flap was harvested for the reconstruction of tibia. (E) Six months after the operation, the extensive lower leg defect was successfully reconstructed.

  • Figure 2 (A) A 48-year-old male had crushing injury of hand, resulting third degree burn involving skin and soft tissue of hand dorsum. (B) Emergent surgery was performed. After radical debridement, anterolateral thigh perforator flap was harvested to reconstruct the defect. (C) Six month after the surgery. Division procedure of fingers was performed.

  • Figure 3 (A) A 73-year-old male patient had suffered hypopharyngeal cancer. (B,C) A 16×8 cm and 7×4 cm lateral thoracic perforator flap was harvested in chimeric pattern for cervical esophageal reconstruction. (D) Customized insetting of tubed lateral thoracic perforator flap and latissimus dorsi skin flap for simultaneous esophageal reconstruction and monitoring flap. (E) Esophagogram showed a good passage in a new conduit of tubed flap after the reconstruction. (F) Postoperative endoscopic view shows successful reconstruction of esophagus. (G) Postoperative view shows successful reconstruction of esophagus and outer resurfacing.

  • Figure 4 (A,B) A 22-year-old female with depressive deformity of forehead due to frontal sinusitis after traffic accident. (C,D) Intraoperative view of thoracodorsal perforator flap of adipomyofascial component. (E,F) Two years after the surgery. Depressive deformity was successfully reconstructed and the patient was satisfied with aesthetic result. Informed consent was received from the patient.

  • Figure 5 (A,B) A 44-year-old female had total mastectomy 5 years ago. (C) Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap was elevated. (D,E) Six month after the surgery, nipple-areolar complex was reconstructed and tattooed.

  • Figure 6 (A) A 27-year-old female had a traffic accident. The car ran over the foot, resulting in skin defect. (B) The pattern of the defect was copied. (C,D) Thin thoracodorsal perforator flap was elevated according to the pattern of the defect for tailored reconstruction. (E,F) Two years after the surgery, the patient was able to wear same size shoes and walk normally.


Reference

1. Murphy JB. Resection of arteries and veins injured in continuity-end-to-end of suture-experimental and clinical research. Med Rec. 1897; 51:73–88.
2. Carrel A. The operative technique of vascular anastomoses and the transplantation of viscera. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1963; 29:3–6.
3. Jacobson JH, Suarez EL. Microsurgery in anastomosis of small vessels. Surg Forum. 1960; 11:243–245.
4. Daniel RK, Taylor GI. Distant transfer of an island flap by microvascular anastomoses: a clinical technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1973; 52:111–117.
5. O'Brien BM, MacLeod AM, Hayhurst JW, Morrison WA. Successful transfer of a large island flap from the groin to the foot by microvascular anastomoses. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1973; 52:271–278.
6. Chung CN. Clinical observation on skin graft and flap. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg. 1974; 1:23–39.
7. Lim P, Cho MJ, Cho HS, Hur E, Lee JW, Ham KS. An axillary scar contracture corrected by microvascular free groin flap transfer. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg. 1978; 5:189–194.
8. Orticochea M. The musculo-cutaneous flap method: an immediate and heroic substitute for the method of delay. Br J Plast Surg. 1972; 25:106–110.
Article
9. Ponten B. The fasciocutaneous flap: its use in soft tissue defects of the lower leg. Br J Plast Surg. 1981; 34:215–220.
Article
10. Koshima I, Soeda S. Inferior epigastric artery skin flaps without rectus abdominis muscle. Br J Plast Surg. 1989; 42:645–648.
Article
11. Kim JT. Latissimus dorsi perforator flap. Clin Plast Surg. 2003; 30:403–431.
Article
12. Kim JT. Two options for perforator flaps in the flank donor site: latissimus dorsi and thoracodorsal perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005; 115:755–763.
Article
13. Armstrong MB, Masri N, Venugopal R. Reconstructive microsurgery: reviewing the past, anticipating the future. Clin Plast Surg. 2001; 28:671–686.
14. Saint-Cyr M, Wong C, Buchel EW, Colohan S, Pederson WC. Free tissue transfers and replantation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 130:858e–878e.
Article
15. Kang MJ, Chung CH, Chang YJ, Kim KH. Reconstruction of the lower extremity using free flaps. Arch Plast Surg. 2013; 40:575–583.
Article
16. Han DH, Park MC, Park DH, Song H, Lee IJ. Role of muscle free flap in the salvage of complicated scalp wounds and infected prosthetic dura. Arch Plast Surg. 2013; 40:735–741.
Article
17. Genden EM, Rinaldo A, Suarez C, Wei WI, Bradley PJ, Ferlito A. Complications of free flap transfers for head and neck reconstruction following cancer resection. Oral Oncol. 2004; 40:979–984.
Article
18. Mun GH, Kim HJ, Cha MK, Kim WY. Impact of perforator mapping using multidetector-row computed tomographic angiography on free thoracodorsal artery perforator flap transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 122:1079–1088.
Article
19. Park CW, Kim YH, Hwang KT, Kim JT. Reconstruction of a severely crushed leg with interpositional vessel grafts and latissimus dorsi flap. Arch Plast Surg. 2012; 39:417–421.
Article
20. Breidenbach WC 3rd. Emergency free tissue transfer for reconstruction of acute upper extremity wounds. Clin Plast Surg. 1989; 16:505–514.
Article
21. Park JH, Min KH, Eun SC, Lee JH, Hong SH, Kim CW. Scalp free flap reconstruction using anterolateral thigh flap pedicle for interposition artery and vein grafts. Arch Plast Surg. 2012; 39:55–58.
Article
22. Kimata Y, Uchiyama K, Ebihara S, Yoshizumi T, Asai M, Saikawa M, Hayashi R, Jitsuiki Y, Majima K, Ohyama W, Haneda T, Nakatsuka T, Harii K. Versatility of the free anterolateral thigh flap for reconstruction of head and neck defects. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997; 123:1325–1331.
Article
23. Koshima I, Yamamoto H, Hosoda M, Moriguchi T, Orita Y, Nagayama H. Free combined composite flaps using the lateral circumflex femoral system for repair of massive defects of the head and neck regions: an introduction to the chimeric flap principle. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993; 92:411–420.
Article
24. Grover R, Nelson JA, Fischer JP, Kovach SJ, Serletti JM, Wu LC. The impact of perforator number on deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction. Arch Plast Surg. 2014; 41:63–70.
Article
25. Healy C, Ramakrishnan V. Autologous microvascular breast reconstruction. Arch Plast Surg. 2013; 40:3–10.
Article
26. Huang WC, Chen HC, Wei FC, Cheng MH, Schnur DP. Chimeric flap in clinical use. Clin Plast Surg. 2003; 30:457–467.
Article
27. Coleman JJ 3rd, Tan KC, Searles JM, Hester TR, Nahai F. Jejunal free autograft: analysis of complications and their resolution. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989; 84:589–595.
28. Sardesai MG, Fung K, Yoo JH, Bakker H. Donor-site morbidity following radial forearm free tissue transfer in head and neck surgery. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008; 37:411–416.
29. Bae SK, Kang SJ, Kim JW, Kim YH, Sun H. Reconstruction of abdominal wall of a chronically infected postoperative wound with a rectus abdominis myofascial splitting flap. Arch Plast Surg. 2013; 40:28–35.
Article
30. Jung JA, Kim YW, Kang SR. Reconstruction of unexpected huge chest wall defect after recurrent breast cancer excision using a TRAM flap combined with partial latissimus dorsi muscle flap. Arch Plast Surg. 2013; 40:76–79.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKMA
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr