J Korean Med Assoc.  2013 Jan;56(1):16-22. 10.5124/jkma.2013.56.1.16.

Virtual reality based stroke rehabilitation

• Kim DY
• Park JB

• KMID: 2192896
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2013.56.1.16

Abstract

Virtual reality (VR) is defined as an approach to user-computer interface that involves real-time simulation of an environment, scenario, or activity that allows for user interaction via multiple sensory channels. In recent years, virtual reality has grown immensely with rapid advancement of VR technologies in the field of stroke rehabilitation. In this paper, current VR applications to the field of rehabilitation are reviewed. In the field of stroke rehabilitation, many clinical trials related to VR-based assessment and treatment have been performed to assess and treat arm dysfunction, walking ability, visuospatial problems, cognitive dysfunction, etc. Among them, VR is beneficial in improving arm function when compared with conventional therapy with limited evidence. Whether VR improves walking, visuospatial problems, or cognitive function has not been well established yet. However, VR can simulate the real environment without the risks arising from errors, and can also give a sense of immersion in the simulated environment and a concomitant feeling of 'presence'. Moreover, VR provides the motivation of gaming factors. With these advantages, VR will be one of the major advanced technologies for assessment and managing post-stroke dysfunction in the future.

Keyword

Virtual reality; Stroke; Rehabilitation

MeSH Terms

Arm
Immersion
Motivation
Stroke
User-Computer Interface
Walking

Reference

1. Burdea GC. Virtual rehabilitation: benefits and challenges. Methods Inf Med. 2003; 42:519–523.

2. Crosbie JH, Lennon S, Basford JR, McDonough SM. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: still more virtual than real. Disabil Rehabil. 2007; 29:1139–1146.

3. Holden MK. Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation: review. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2005; 8:187–211.

4. Adamovich SV, August K, Merians A, Tunik E. A virtual reality-based system integrated with fmri to study neural mechanisms of action observation-execution: a proof of concept study. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2009; 27:209–223.

5. Sutherland IE. Association for Computer Machinery. A head-mounted three dimensional display. Proceedings of the Fall Joint Computer Conference, part I. 1968. 1968 Dec 9-11; New York: Association for Computer Machinery;p. 757–764.

6. Barfield W, Furness TA. Virtual environments and advanced interface design. New York: Oxford University Press;1995.

7. Oujamaa L, Relave I, Froger J, Mottet D, Pelissier JY. Rehabilitation of arm function after stroke: literature review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2009; 52:269–293.

8. Holden MK, Dyar T. Virtual environment training: a new tool for neurorehabilitation. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2002; 26:62–71.

9. Jang SH, You SH, Hallett M, Cho YW, Park CM, Cho SH, Lee HY, Kim TH. Cortical reorganization and associated functional motor recovery after virtual reality in patients with chronic stroke: an experimenter-blind preliminary study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86:2218–2223.

10. Piron L, Tonin P, Atzori AM, Zucconi C, Massaro C, Trivello E, Dam M. The augmented-feedback rehabilitation technique facilitates the arm motor recovery in patients after a recent stroke. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2003; 94:265–267.

11. Laver K, George S, Thomas S, Deutsch JE, Crotty M. Cochrane review: virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2012; 48:523–530.

12. Saposnik G, Teasell R, Mamdani M, Hall J, McIlroy W, Cheung D, Thorpe KE, Cohen LG, Bayley M. Stroke Outcome Research Canada (SORCan) Working Group. Effectiveness of virtual reality using Wii gaming technology in stroke rehabilitation: a pilot randomized clinical trial and proof of principle. Stroke. 2010; 41:1477–1484.

13. Boian R, Sharma A, Han C, Merians A, Burdea G, Adamovich S, Recce M, Tremaine M, Poizner H. Virtual reality-based post-stroke hand rehabilitation. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2002; 85:64–70.

14. Broeren J, Rydmark M, Bjorkdahl A, Sunnerhagen KS. Assessment and training in a 3-dimensional virtual environment with haptics: a report on 5 cases of motor rehabilitation in the chronic stage after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007; 21:180–189.

15. Kang YJ, Ku J, Han K, Kim SI, Yu TW, Lee JH, Park CI. Development and clinical trial of virtual reality-based cognitive assessment in people with stroke: preliminary study. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008; 11:329–339.

16. Broeren J, Rydmark M, Sunnerhagen KS. Virtual reality and haptics as a training device for movement rehabilitation after stroke: a single-case study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85:1247–1250.

17. Piron L, Turolla A, Agostini M, Zucconi CS, Ventura L, Tonin P, Dam M. Motor learning principles for rehabilitation: a pilot randomized controlled study in poststroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010; 24:501–508.

18. Merians AS, Poizner H, Boian R, Burdea G, Adamovich S. Sensorimotor training in a virtual reality environment: does it improve functional recovery poststroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006; 20:252–267.

19. Housman SJ, Scott KM, Reinkensmeyer DJ. A randomized controlled trial of gravity-supported, computer-enhanced arm exercise for individuals with severe hemiparesis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009; 23:505–514.

20. Jaffe DL, Brown DA, Pierson-Carey CD, Buckley EL, Lew HL. Stepping over obstacles to improve walking in individuals with poststroke hemiplegia. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004; 41(3A):283–292.

21. You SH, Jang SH, Kim YH, Hallett M, Ahn SH, Kwon YH, Kim JH, Lee MY. Virtual reality-induced cortical reorganization and associated locomotor recovery in chronic stroke: an experimenter-blind randomized study. Stroke. 2005; 36:1166–1171.

22. Deutsch JE, Paserchia C, Vecchione C, Mirelman A, Lewis JA, Boian R, Burdea G. Improved gait and elevation speed of individuals post-stroke after lower extremity training in virtual environments. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2004; 28:185–186.

23. Mirelman A, Bonato P, Deutsch JE. Effects of training with a robot-virtual reality system compared with a robot alone on the gait of individuals after stroke. Stroke. 2009; 40:169–174.

24. Yang YR, Tsai MP, Chuang TY, Sung WH, Wang RY. Virtual reality-based training improves community ambulation in individuals with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Gait Posture. 2008; 28:201–206.

25. Dunning K, Levine P, Schmitt L, Israel S, Fulk G. An ankle to computer virtual reality system for improving gait and function in a person 9 months poststroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2008; 15:602–610.

26. Broeren J, Samuelsson H, Stibrant-Sunnerhagen K, Blomstrand C, Rydmark M. Neglect assessment as an application of virtual reality. Acta Neurol Scand. 2007; 116:157–163.

27. Kim DY, Ku J, Chang WH, Park TH, Lim JY, Han K, Kim IY, Kim SI. Assessment of post-stroke extrapersonal neglect using a three-dimensional immersive virtual street crossing program. Acta Neurol Scand. 2010; 121:171–177.

28. Kim K, Kim J, Ku J, Kim DY, Chang WH, Shin DI, Lee JH, Kim IY, Kim SI. A virtual reality assessment and training system for unilateral neglect. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2004; 7:742–749.

29. Katz N, Ring H, Naveh Y, Kizony R, Feintuch U, Weiss PL. Interactive virtual environment training for safe street crossing of right hemisphere stroke patients with unilateral spatial neglect. Disabil Rehabil. 2005; 27:1235–1243.

30. Parsons TD, Rizzo AA. Initial validation of a virtual environment for assessment of memory functioning: virtual reality cognitive performance assessment test. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008; 11:17–25.