J Korean Neurosurg Soc.  2013 Dec;54(6):501-506. 10.3340/jkns.2013.54.6.501.

Factors Associated with the Success of Trial Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Chronic Pain from Failed Back Surgery Syndrome

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 2Department of Neurosurgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
  • 3Department of Neurosurgery, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. chough@catholic.ac.kr

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an effective means of treatment of chronic neuropathic pain from failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). Because the success of trial stimulation is an essential part of SCS, we investigated factors associated with success of trial stimulation.
METHODS
Successful trial stimulation was possible in 26 of 44 patients (63.6%) who underwent insertion of electrodes for the treatment of chronic pain from FBSS. To investigate factors associated with successful trial stimulation, patients were classified into two groups (success and failure in trial). We investigated the following factors : age, sex, predominant pain areas (axial, limb, axial combined with limbs), number of operations, duration of preoperative pain, type of electrode (cylindrical/paddle), predominant type of pain (nociceptive, neuropathic, mixed), degree of sensory loss in painful areas, presence of motor weakness, and preoperative Visual Analogue Scale.
RESULTS
There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, degree of pain, number of operations, and duration of pain (p>0.05). Univariate analysis revealed that the type of electrode and presence of severe sensory deficits were significantly associated with the success of trial stimulation (p<0.05). However, the remaining variable, sex, type of pain, main location of pain, degree of pain duration, degree of sensory loss, and presence of motor weakness, were not associated with the trial success of SCS for FBSS.
CONCLUSION
Trial stimulation with paddle leads was more successful. If severe sensory deficits occur in the painful dermatomes in FBSS, trial stimulation were less effective.

Keyword

Chronic pain; Failed back surgery syndrome; Spinal surgery; Spinal cord stimulation

MeSH Terms

Chronic Pain*
Electrodes
Extremities
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome*
Humans
Neuralgia
Spinal Cord Stimulation*
Spinal Cord*

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Location and types of electrodes according to pain location. A : A cylindrical lead placed at T12/L1 level for unilateral limb pain. B : Two cylindrical leads at T12/L1 level for bilateral limb pain. C : A paddle lead (2 column array) at T12/L1 for bilateral limb pain. D : A paddle lead (3 column array) at T8/9 for complex pain (low back and limbs).


Cited by  1 articles

Spinal Cord Stimulation for Refractory Neuropathic Pain of Neuralgic Amyotrophy
Jae-hun Kim, Sang-woo Ha, Byung-chul Son
Korean J Neurotrauma. 2015;11(2):162-166.    doi: 10.13004/kjnt.2015.11.2.162.


Reference

1. Allegri M, Arachi G, Barbieri M, Paulin L, Bettaglio R, Bonetti G, et al. Prospective study of the success and efficacy of spinal cord stimulation. Minerva Anestesiol. 2004; 70:117–124. PMID: 14997084.
2. Andersson HI, Ejlertsson G, Leden I, Scherstén B. Impact of chronic pain on health care seeking, self care, and medication. Results from a population-based Swedish study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999; 53:503–509. PMID: 10562870.
Article
3. Bala MM, Riemsma RP, Nixon J, Kleijnen J. Systematic review of the (cost-)effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation for people with failed back surgery syndrome. Clin J Pain. 2008; 24:741–756. PMID: 18936591.
Article
4. Beersen N, Redekop WK, de Bruijn JH, Theuvenet PJ, Berg M, Klazinga NS. Quality based social insurance coverage and payment of the application of a high cost medical therapy : the case of spinal cord stimulation for chronic non-oncologic pain in The Netherlands. Health Policy. 2005; 71:107–115. PMID: 15563997.
Article
5. Bouhassira D, Attal N, Alchaar H, Boureau F, Brochet B, Bruxelle J, et al. Comparison of pain syndromes associated with nervous or somatic lesions and development of a new neuropathic pain diagnostic questionnaire (DN4). Pain. 2005; 114:29–36. PMID: 15733628.
Article
6. Broggi G, Servello D, Dones I, Carbone G. Italian multicentric study on pain treatment with epidural spinal cord stimulation. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1994; 62:273–278. PMID: 7631081.
Article
7. Burchiel KJ, Anderson VC, Wilson BJ, Denison DB, Olson KA, Shatin D. Prognostic factors of spinal cord stimulation for chronic back and leg pain. Neurosurgery. 1995; 36:1101–1110. discussion 1110-1111. PMID: 7643988.
Article
8. Burton CV. Failed back surgery patients : the alarm bells are ringing. Surg Neurol. 2006; 65:5–6. PMID: 16378838.
9. Campbell CM, Jamison RN, Edwards RR. Psychological screening/phenotyping as predictors for spinal cord stimulation. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2013; 17:307. PMID: 23247806.
Article
10. Canlas B, Drake T, Gabriel E. A severe case of complex regional pain syndrome I (reflex sympathetic dystrophy) managed with spinal cord stimulation. Pain Pract. 2010; 10:78–83. PMID: 19863748.
Article
11. Celestin J, Edwards RR, Jamison RN. Pretreatment psychosocial variables as predictors of outcomes following lumbar surgery and spinal cord stimulation : a systematic review and literature synthesis. Pain Med. 2009; 10:639–653. PMID: 19638142.
Article
12. Chan CW, Peng P. Failed back surgery syndrome. Pain Med. 2011; 12:577–606. PMID: 21463472.
Article
13. Chou R. Generating evidence on spinal cord stimulation for failed back surgery syndrome : not yet fully charged. Clin J Pain. 2008; 24:757–758. PMID: 18936592.
Article
14. Doleys DM. Psychological factors in spinal cord stimulation therapy : brief review and discussion. Neurosurg Focus. 2006; 21:E1. PMID: 17341042.
15. Frey ME, Manchikanti L, Benyamin RM, Schultz DM, Smith HS, Cohen SP. Spinal cord stimulation for patients with failed back surgery syndrome : a systematic review. Pain Physician. 2009; 12:379–397. PMID: 19305486.
16. Kumar K, Taylor RS, Jacques L, Eldabe S, Meglio M, Molet J, et al. Spinal cord stimulation versus conventional medical management for neuropathic pain : a multicentre randomised controlled trial in patients with failed back surgery syndrome. Pain. 2007; 132:179–188. PMID: 17845835.
Article
17. Kumar K, Taylor RS, Jacques L, Eldabe S, Meglio M, Molet J, et al. The effects of spinal cord stimulation in neuropathic pain are sustained : a 24-month follow-up of the prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial of the effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation. Neurosurgery. 2008; 63:762–770. discussion 770. PMID: 18981888.
Article
18. Law JD, Lehman RA, Kirsch WM. Reoperation after lumbar intervertebral disc surgery. J Neurosurg. 1978; 48:259–263. PMID: 146731.
Article
19. Lehmann TR, LaRocca HS. Repeat lumbar surgery. A review of patients with failure from previous lumbar surgery treated by spinal canal exploration and lumbar spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1981; 6:615–619. PMID: 6461073.
20. Manca A, Kumar K, Taylor RS, Jacques L, Eldabe S, Meglio M, et al. Quality of life, resource consumption and costs of spinal cord stimulation versus conventional medical management in neuropathic pain patients with failed back surgery syndrome (PROCESS trial). Eur J Pain. 2008; 12:1047–1058. PMID: 18359255.
Article
21. Meglio M, Cioni B, Visocchi M, Tancredi A, Pentimalli L. Spinal cord stimulation in low back and leg pain. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1994; 62:263–266. PMID: 7631079.
Article
22. Meyerson BA, Linderoth B. Mode of action of spinal cord stimulation in neuropathic pain. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2006; 31(4 Suppl):S6–S12. PMID: 16647596.
Article
23. Miller B, Gatchel RJ, Lou L, Stowell A, Robinson R, Polatin PB. Interdisciplinary treatment of failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) : a comparison of FBSS and non-FBSS patients. Pain Pract. 2005; 5:190–202. PMID: 17147581.
Article
24. Nachemson AL. Evaluation of results in lumbar spine surgery. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1993; 251:130–133. PMID: 8451971.
Article
25. North RB, Campbell JN, James CS, Conover-Walker MK, Wang H, Piantadosi S, et al. Failed back surgery syndrome : 5-year follow-up in 102 patients undergoing repeated operation. Neurosurgery. 1991; 28:685–690. discussion 690-691. PMID: 1831546.
26. North RB, Ewend MG, Lawton MT, Piantadosi S. Spinal cord stimulation for chronic, intractable pain : superiority of "multi-channel" devices. Pain. 1991; 44:119–130. PMID: 2052378.
Article
27. North RB, Kidd DH, Farrokhi F, Piantadosi SA. Spinal cord stimulation versus repeated lumbosacral spine surgery for chronic pain : a randomized, controlled trial. Neurosurgery. 2005; 56:98–106. discussion 106-107. PMID: 15617591.
28. North RB, Kidd DH, Olin JC, Sieracki JM. Spinal cord stimulation electrode design : prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing percutaneous and laminectomy electrodes-part I : technical outcomes. Neurosurgery. 2002; 51:381–389. discussion 389-390. PMID: 12182776.
Article
29. North RB, Kidd DH, Petrucci L, Dorsi MJ. Spinal cord stimulation electrode design : a prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing percutaneous with laminectomy electrodes : part II-clinical outcomes. Neurosurgery. 2005; 57:990–996. discussion 990-996. PMID: 16284568.
Article
30. North RB, Lanning A, Hessels R, Cutchis PN. Spinal cord stimulation with percutaneous and plate electrodes : side effects and quantitative comparisons. Neurosurg Focus. 1997; 2:e3. PMID: 15096024.
31. Sears NC, Machado AG, Nagel SJ, Deogaonkar M, Stanton-Hicks M, Rezai AR, et al. Long-term outcomes of spinal cord stimulation with paddle leads in the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome and failed back surgery syndrome. Neuromodulation. 2011; 14:312–318. discussion 318. PMID: 21992424.
Article
32. Shealy CN, Mortimer JT, Reswick JB. Electrical inhibition of pain by stimulation of the dorsal columns : preliminary clinical report. Anesth Analg. 1967; 46:489–491. PMID: 4952225.
33. Sparkes E, Raphael JH, Duarte RV, LeMarchand K, Jackson C, Ashford RL. A systematic literature review of psychological characteristics as determinants of outcome for spinal cord stimulation therapy. Pain. 2010; 150:284–289. PMID: 20603026.
Article
34. Spiegelmann R, Friedman WA. Spinal cord stimulation : a contemporary series. Neurosurgery. 1991; 28:65–70. discussion 70-71. PMID: 1704492.
35. Taylor RS. Spinal cord stimulation in complex regional pain syndrome and refractory neuropathic back and leg pain/failed back surgery syndrome : results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2006; 31(4 Suppl):S13–S19. PMID: 16647590.
36. Taylor RS, Van Buyten JP, Buchser E. Spinal cord stimulation for chronic back and leg pain and failed back surgery syndrome : a systematic review and analysis of prognostic factors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30:152–160. PMID: 15626996.
Article
37. Taylor RS, Van Buyten JP, Buchser E. Spinal cord stimulation for complex regional pain syndrome : a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effectiveness literature and assessment of prognostic factors. Eur J Pain. 2006; 10:91–101. PMID: 16310712.
38. Tunks ER, Crook J, Weir R. Epidemiology of chronic pain with psychological comorbidity : prevalence, risk, course, and prognosis. Can J Psychiatry. 2008; 53:224–234. PMID: 18478825.
Article
39. Waguespack A, Schofferman J, Slosar P, Reynolds J. Etiology of long-term failures of lumbar spine surgery. Pain Med. 2002; 3:18–22. PMID: 15102214.
Article
40. Yanamoto F, Murakawa K. The effects of temporary spinal cord stimulation (or spinal nerve root stimulation) on the management of early postherpetic neuralgia from one to six months of its onset. Neuromodulation. 2012; 15:151–154. discussion 154. PMID: 22376181.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKNS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr