J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg.  2012 Aug;38(4):204-211. 10.5125/jkaoms.2012.38.4.204.

Biological markers around immediately placed titanium implant in the extraction socket of diabetic and insulin-treated rat maxilla

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. spyo@catholic.ac.kr

Abstract


OBJECTIVES
Dental implants installation in patients with diabetes remains controversial as altered bone healing around implants has been reported. And little is known about the biological factors involved in bone healing around implants. The present study aimed to investigate the biological markers around immediately placed implants in rats with controlled and uncontrolled diabetes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Twenty rats (40 sites) were divided into the control, insulin-treated and diabetic groups. The rats received streptozotocin (60 mg/kg) to induce diabetes; animals in the insulin-treated group also received three units of subcutaneous slow-release insulin. Two threaded titanium alloy implant (1.2x3 mm) were placed in the extraction socket of the both maxillary first molars and allowed for healing. Bone blocks including implant were harvested at 3 days, 1, 2 and 4 weeks. The levels of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-4, transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta1, osteocalcin (OC) and osteonectin (ON) were measured in the peri-implant osseous samples by RT-PCR.
RESULTS
The BMP-4 level increased immediately in all groups by day 3, then decreased abruptly in the control and the insulin-treated groups. However, by week 4, all groups showed mostly the same amount of BMP-4 expression. The level of TGF-beta1 also instantly increased by day 3 in the insulin-treated group. This level elevated again reaching the same values as the control group by week 4, but was not as high as the diabetic group. In addition, the expression of OC and ON in the control and insulin-treated groups was higher than that of the diabetic group at 2 weeks and 4 weeks, indicating active bone formation in these groups.
CONCLUSION
The immediate placement of titanium implants in the maxilla of diabetic rat led to an unwanted bone healing response. Conclusively, the results of this study suggest that immediate implant insertion in patients with poorly controlled diabetes might be contraindicated.

Keyword

Type 1 diabetes; Dental implant; Insulin; Biological markers

MeSH Terms

Alloys
Animals
Biological Factors
Biomarkers
Bone Morphogenetic Proteins
Dental Implants
Humans
Insulin
Maxilla
Molar
Osteocalcin
Osteogenesis
Osteonectin
Rats
Streptozocin
Titanium
Transforming Growth Factor beta1
Transforming Growth Factors
Alloys
Biological Factors
Bone Morphogenetic Proteins
Dental Implants
Insulin
Osteocalcin
Osteonectin
Streptozocin
Titanium
Transforming Growth Factor beta1
Transforming Growth Factors

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Schematic design of the experiment (A) and titanium implants placed in the extraction socket of both maxillary first molars (B).

  • Fig. 2 Representative RT-PCR. RT-PCR products run on an agarose gel. The ratio of the fluorescence of each RT-PCR product to that of GAPDH was calculated. Lane 1-5: product of 3 days, lane 6-10: 1 week, lane 11-15: 2 week and lane 16-20: 4 week, respectively. (BMP: bone morphogenetic protein, TGF: transforming growth factor, GAPDH: glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase)

  • Fig. 3 BMP-4 expression pattern in the surrounding bone of immediately placed implant in the control, insulin-treated and diabetic rats at different healing phases by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis. (BMP: bone morphogenetic protein, DM: diabetes, DMC: diabetes controlled, C: controlled)

  • Fig. 4 TGF-β1 expression pattern in the surrounding bone of immediately placed implant in the control, insulin-treated and diabetic rats at different healing phases by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis. (TGF: transforming growth factor, DM: diabetes, DMC: diabetes controlled, C: controlled)

  • Fig. 5 Osteocalcin expression pattern in the surrounding bone of immediately placed implant in the control, insulin-treated and diabetic rats at different healing phases by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis. (DM: diabetes, DMC: diabetes controlled, C: controlled)

  • Fig. 6 Osteonectin expression pattern in the surrounding bone of immediately placed implant in the control, insulin-treated and diabetic rats at different healing phases by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis. (DM: diabetes, DMC: diabetes controlled, C: controlled)


Reference

1. Lazzara RJ. Immediate implant placement into extraction sites: surgical and restorative advantages. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1989. 9:332–343.
2. Wagenberg BD, Ginsburg TR. Immediate implant placement on removal of the natural tooth: retrospective analysis of 1,081 implants. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2001. 22:399–404.
3. Becker W, Goldstein M. Immediate implant placement: treatment planning and surgical steps for successful outcome. Periodontol 2000. 2008. 47:79–89.
Article
4. Marder MZ. Medical conditions affecting the success of dental implants. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2004. 25:739–742.
5. Oczakir C, Balmer S, Mericske-stern R. Implant-prosthodontic treatment for special care patients: a case series study. Int J Prosthodont. 2005. 18:383–389.
6. McMahon MM, Bistrian BR. Host defenses and susceptibility to infection in patients with diabetes mellitus. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1995. 9:1–9.
Article
7. Kotsovilis S, Karoussis IK, Fourmousis I. A comprehensive and critical review of dental implant placement in diabetic animals and patients. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006. 17:587–599.
Article
8. Mombelli A, Cionca N. Systemic diseases affecting osseointegration therapy. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006. 17:Suppl 2. 97–103.
Article
9. Olson JW, Shernoff AF, Tarlow JL, Colwell JA, Scheetz JP, Bingham SF. Dental endosseous implant assessments in a type 2 diabetic population: a prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000. 15:811–818.
10. van Steenberghe D, Jacobs R, Desnyder M, Maffei G, Quirynen M. The relative impact of local and endogenous patient-related factors on implant failure up to the abutment stage. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002. 13:617–622.
Article
11. Fiorellini JP, Chen PK, Nevins M, Nevins ML. A retrospective study of dental implants in diabetic patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2000. 20:366–373.
12. Morris HF, Ochi S, Winkler S. Implant survival in patients with type 2 diabetes: placement to 36 months. Ann Periodontol. 2000. 5:157–165.
Article
13. Nevins ML, Karimbux NY, Weber HP, Giannobile WV, Fiorellini JP. Wound healing around endosseous implants in experimental diabetes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998. 13:620–629.
Article
14. Fiorellini JP, Nevins ML, Norkin A, Weber HP, Karimbux NY. The effect of insulin therapy on osseointegration in a diabetic rat model. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999. 10:362–368.
Article
15. Mccracken MS, Aponte-wesson R, Chavali R, Lemons JE. Bone associated with implants in diabetic and insulin-treated rats. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006. 17:495–500.
Article
16. Takeshita F, Iyama S, Ayukawa Y, Kido MA, Murai K, Suetsugu T. The effects of diabetes on the interface between hydroxyapatite implants and bone in rat tibia. J Periodontol. 1997. 68:180–185.
Article
17. Siqueira JT, Cavalher-Machado SC, Arana-Chavez VE, Sannomiya P. Bone formation around titanium implants in the rat tibia: role of insulin. Implant Dent. 2003. 12:242–251.
Article
18. Shirakura M, Fujii N, Ohnishi H, Taguchi Y, Ohshima H, Nomura S, et al. Tissue response to titanium implantation in the rat maxilla, with special reference to the effects of surface conditions on bone formation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003. 14:687–696.
Article
19. Shyng YC, Devlin H, Ou KL. Bone formation around immediately placed oral implants in diabetic rats. Int J Prosthodont. 2006. 19:513–514.
20. Hasegawa H, Ozawa S, Hashimoto K, Takeichi T, Ogawa T. Type 2 diabetes impairs implant osseointegration capacity in rats. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008. 23:237–246.
21. Kwon PT, Rahman SS, Kim DM, Kopman JA, Karimbux NY, Fiorellini JP. Maintenance of osseointegration utilizing insulin therapy in a diabetic rat model. J Periodontol. 2005. 76:621–626.
Article
22. Matin K, Senpuku H, Hanada N, Ozawa H, Ejiri S. Bone regeneration by recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 around immediate implants: a pilot study in rats. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003. 18:211–217.
23. Goodman WG, Hori MT. Diminished bone formation in experimental diabetes. Relationship to osteoid maturation and mineralization. Diabetes. 1984. 33:825–831.
Article
24. Verhaeghe J, Suiker AM, Nyomba BL, Visser WJ, Einhorn TA, Dequeker J, et al. Bone mineral homeostasis in spontaneously diabetic BB rats. II. Impaired bone turnover and decreased osteocalcin synthesis. Endocrinology. 1989. 124:573–582.
Article
25. Schenk RK, Buser D. Osseointegration: a reality. Periodontol 2000. 1998. 17:22–35.
Article
26. Reddi AH. Bone morphogenetic proteins: from basic science to clinical applications. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001. 83-A Suppl 1:S1–S6.
Article
27. Katagiri T, Takahashi N. Regulatory mechanisms of osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation. Oral Dis. 2002. 8:147–159.
Article
28. Ahrens M, Ankenbauer T, Schröder D, Hollnagel A, Mayer H, Gross G. Expression of human bone morphogenetic proteins-2 or -4 in murine mesenchymal progenitor C3H10T1/2 cells induces differentiation into distinct mesenchymal cell lineages. DNA Cell Biol. 1993. 12:871–880.
Article
29. Ogawa T, Sukotjo C, Nishimura I. Modulated bone matrix-related gene expression is associated with differences in interfacial strength of different implant surface roughness. J Prosthodont. 2002. 11:241–247.
Article
30. Carrington JL, Roberts AB, Flanders KC, Roche NS, Reddi AH. Accumulation, localization, and compartmentation of transforming growth factor beta during endochondral bone development. J Cell Biol. 1988. 107:1969–1975.
Article
31. Horner A, Kemp P, Summers C, Bord S, Bishop NJ, Kelsall AW, et al. Expression and distribution of transforming growth factor-beta isoforms and their signaling receptors in growing human bone. Bone. 1998. 23:95–102.
Article
32. Noda M, Camilliere JJ. In vivo stimulation of bone formation by transforming growth factor-beta. Endocrinology. 1989. 124:2991–2994.
Article
33. Rosier RN, O'keefe RJ, Hicks DG. The potential role of transforming growth factor beta in fracture healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998. 355 Suppl:S294–S300.
Article
34. Marcelli C, Yates AJ, Mundy GR. In vivo effects of human recombinant transforming growth factor beta on bone turnover in normal mice. J Bone Miner Res. 1990. 5:1087–1096.
Article
35. Seto H, Aoki K, Kasugai S, Ohya K. Trabecular bone turnover, bone marrow cell development, and gene expression of bone matrix proteins after low calcium feeding in rats. Bone. 1999. 25:687–695.
Article
36. Ogawa T, Nishimura I. Genes differentially expressed in titanium implant healing. J Dent Res. 2006. 85:566–570.
Article
37. Westerlind KC, Wronski TJ, Evans GL, Turner RT. The effect of long-term ovarian hormone deficiency on transforming growth factor-beta and bone matrix protein mRNA expression in rat femora. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1994. 200:283–289.
Article
38. Boskey AL, Maresca M, Ullrich W, Doty SB, Butler WT, Prince CW. Osteopontin-hydroxyapatite interactions in vitro: inhibition of hydroxyapatite formation and growth in a gelatin-gel. Bone Miner. 1993. 22:147–159.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKAOMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr