J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg.  2015 Apr;41(2):59-65. 10.5125/jkaoms.2015.41.2.59.

Common risk factors for postoperative pain following the extraction of wisdom teeth

Affiliations
  • 1Iranian Tissue Bank and Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. vahid.rakhshan@gmail.com
  • 2Department of Dental Anatomy and Morphology, Dental Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

The extraction of third molars is a common task carried out at dental/surgery clinics. Postoperative pain is one of the two most common complications of this surgery, along with dry socket. Knowledge of the frequent risk factors of this complication is useful in determining high-risk patients, planning treatment, and preparing the patients mentally. Since the risk factors for postoperative pain have never been summarized before while the risk factors for dry socket have been highly debated, this report summarizes the literature regarding the common predictors of postextraction pain. Except for surgical difficulty and the surgeon's experience, the influences of other risk factors (age, gender and oral contraceptive use) were rather inconclusive. The case of a female gender or oral contraceptive effect might mainly be associated with estrogen levels (when it comes to dry socket), which can differ considerably from case to case. Improvement in and unification of statistical and diagnostic methods seem necessary. In addition, each risk factor was actually a combination of various independent variables, which should instead be targeted in more comprehensive studies.

Keyword

Pain; Risk factors; Third molar; Extraction

MeSH Terms

Contraceptive Agents
Dry Socket
Estrogens
Female
Humans
Molar, Third*
Pain, Postoperative*
Risk Factors*
Contraceptive Agents
Estrogens

Cited by  1 articles

Comparison of safety and analgesic efficacy of diclofenac sodium with etodolac after surgical extraction of third molars: a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study
Jitendra H. Vaghela, Jigna H. Shah, Jaladhi H. Patel, Bhargav M. Purohit
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2020;20(1):19-27.    doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.1.19.


Reference

1. Nordenram A. Postoperative complications in oral surgery. A study of cases treated during 1980. Swed Dent J. 1983; 7:109–114. PMID: 6578603.
2. Heng CK, Badner VM, Clemens DL, Mercer LT, Mercer DW. The relationship of cigarette smoking to postoperative complications from dental extractions among female inmates. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007; 104:757–762. PMID: 17764988.
Article
3. El-Soud NA, El Shenawy H. A randomized double blind clinical study on the efficacy of low level laser therapy in reducing pain after simple third molar extraction. Maced J Med Sci. 2010; 3:303–306.
Article
4. Bui CH, Seldin EB, Dodson TB. Types, frequencies, and risk factors for complications after third molar extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003; 61:1379–1389. PMID: 14663801.
Article
5. Peñarrocha M, Sánchis JM, Saez U, Gay C, Bagán JV. Oral hygiene and postoperative pain after mandibular third molar surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001; 92:260–264. PMID: 11552141.
Article
6. de Santana-Santos T, de Souza-Santos JA, Martins-Filho PR, da Silva LC, de Oliveira E Silva ED, Gomes AC. Prediction of post-operative facial swelling, pain and trismus following third molar surgery based on preoperative variables. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013; 18:e65–e70. PMID: 23229245.
Article
7. Calhoun NR. Dry socket and other postoperative complications. Dent Clin North Am. 1971; 15:337–348. PMID: 5313408.
8. Muhonen A, Ventä I, Ylipaavalniemi P. Factors predisposing to postoperative complications related to wisdom tooth surgery among university students. J Am Coll Health. 1997; 46:39–42. PMID: 9248241.
Article
9. Osborn TP, Frederickson G Jr, Small IA, Torgerson TS. A prospective study of complications related to mandibular third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1985; 43:767–769. PMID: 2995624.
Article
10. Lopes V, Mumenya R, Feinmann C, Harris M. Third molar surgery: an audit of the indications for surgery, post-operative complaints and patient satisfaction. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995; 33:33–35. PMID: 7718526.
Article
11. Berge TI, Bøe OE. Predictor evaluation of postoperative morbidity after surgical removal of mandibular third molars. Acta Odontol Scand. 1994; 52:162–169. PMID: 8091963.
Article
12. Capuzzi P, Montebugnoli L, Vaccaro MA. Extraction of impacted third molars. A longitudinal prospective study on factors that affect postoperative recovery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1994; 77:341–343. PMID: 8015796.
13. Lago-Méndez L, Diniz-Freitas M, Senra-Rivera C, Gude-Sampedro F, Gándara Rey JM, García-García A. Relationships between surgical difficulty and postoperative pain in lower third molar extractions. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 65:979–983. PMID: 17448851.
Article
14. Pedersen A. Interrelation of complaints after removal of impacted mandibular third molars. Int J Oral Surg. 1985; 14:241–244. PMID: 3926668.
Article
15. Haraji A, Rakhshan V. Chlorhexidine gel and less difficult surgeries might reduce post-operative pain, controlling for dry socket, infection and analgesic consumption: a split-mouth controlled randomised clinical trial. J Oral Rehabil. 2015; 42:209–219. PMID: 25251411.
Article
16. Slade GD, Foy SP, Shugars DA, Phillips C, White RP Jr. The impact of third molar symptoms, pain, and swelling on oral health-related quality of life. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004; 62:1118–1124. PMID: 15346364.
Article
17. Bienstock DA, Dodson TB, Perrott DH, Chuang SK. Prognostic factors affecting the duration of disability after third molar removal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 69:1272–1277. PMID: 21256646.
Article
18. Wardle J. Dental pessimism: negative cognitions in fearful dental patients. Behav Res Ther. 1984; 22:553–556. PMID: 6508705.
Article
19. Susarla SM, Blaeser BF, Magalnick D. Third molar surgery and associated complications. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2003; 15:177–186. PMID: 18088673.
Article
20. Haraji A, Rakhshan V, Khamverdi N, Alishahi HK. Effects of intraalveolar placement of 0.2% chlorhexidine bioadhesive gel on dry socket incidence and postsurgical pain: a double-blind split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial. J Orofac Pain. 2013; 27:256–262. PMID: 23882458.
Article
21. Blum IR. Contemporary views on dry socket (alveolar osteitis): a clinical appraisal of standardization, aetiopathogenesis and management: a critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002; 31:309–317. PMID: 12190139.
Article
22. Bloomer CR. Alveolar osteitis prevention by immediate placement of medicated packing. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000; 90:282–284. PMID: 10982947.
Article
23. Noroozi AR, Philbert RF. Modern concepts in understanding and management of the "dry socket" syndrome: comprehensive review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009; 107:30–35. PMID: 18755610.
Article
24. Cardoso CL, Rodrigues MT, Ferreira Júnior O, Garlet GP, de Carvalho PS. Clinical concepts of dry socket. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 68:1922–1932. PMID: 20537783.
Article
25. Caso A, Hung LK, Beirne OR. Prevention of alveolar osteitis with chlorhexidine: a meta-analytic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005; 99:155–159. PMID: 15660084.
Article
26. Kolokythas A, Olech E, Miloro M. Alveolar osteitis: a comprehensive review of concepts and controversies. Int J Dent. 2010; 2010:249073. PMID: 20652078.
Article
27. White RP Jr, Shugars DA, Shafer DM, Laskin DM, Buckley MJ, Phillips C. Recovery after third molar surgery: clinical and health-related quality of life outcomes. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003; 61:535–544. PMID: 12730831.
Article
28. Phillips C, White RP Jr, Shugars DA, Zhou X. Risk factors associated with prolonged recovery and delayed healing after third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003; 61:1436–1448. PMID: 14663809.
Article
29. Benediktsdóttir IS, Wenzel A, Petersen JK, Hintze H. Mandibular third molar removal: risk indicators for extended operation time, postoperative pain, and complications. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004; 97:438–446. PMID: 15088029.
Article
30. Halabí D, Escobar J, Muñoz C, Uribe S. Logistic regression analysis of risk factors for the development of alveolar osteitis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 70:1040–1044. PMID: 22305872.
Article
31. Haraji A, Rakhshan V. Single-dose intra-alveolar chlorhexidine gel application, easier surgeries, and younger ages are associated with reduced dry socket risk. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 72:259–265. PMID: 24438596.
Article
32. Sáez Cuesta Ú, Peñarrocha Diago M, Sanchis Bielsa JM, Gay Escoda C. Estudio del postoperatorio de 100 terceros molares mandibulares incluidos, en relación a la edad, el sexo, el tabaco y la higiene bucal. RCOE Revista del Consejo General de Colegios de Odontólogos y Estomatólogos de España. 1999; 4:471–475.
33. Larrazábal C, García B, Penarrocha M, Peñarrocha M. Influence of oral hygiene and smoking on pain and swelling after surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 68:43–46. PMID: 20006153.
Article
34. Blondeau F, Daniel NG. Extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: postoperative complications and their risk factors. J Can Dent Assoc. 2007; 73:325. PMID: 17484797.
35. Oikarinen K. Postoperative pain after mandibular third-molar surgery. Acta Odontol Scand. 1991; 49:7–13. PMID: 2024576.
Article
36. Garcia Garcia A, Gude Sampedro F, Gandara Rey J, Gallas Torreira M. Trismus and pain after removal of impacted lower third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997; 55:1223–1226. PMID: 9371111.
37. Yuasa H, Sugiura M. Clinical postoperative findings after removal of impacted mandibular third molars: prediction of postoperative facial swelling and pain based on preoperative variables. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004; 42:209–214. PMID: 15121265.
Article
38. Grossi GB, Maiorana C, Garramone RA, Borgonovo A, Creminelli L, Santoro F. Assessing postoperative discomfort after third molar surgery: a prospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 65:901–917. PMID: 17448840.
Article
39. Baqain ZH, Karaky AA, Sawair F, Khraisat A, Duaibis R, Rajab LD. Frequency estimates and risk factors for postoperative morbidity after third molar removal: a prospective cohort study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008; 66:2276–2283. PMID: 18940492.
Article
40. Seymour RA, Meechan JG, Blair GS. An investigation into postoperative pain after third molar surgery under local analgesia. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1985; 23:410–418. PMID: 2933061.
Article
41. de Santana Santos T, Calazans AC, Martins-Filho PR, Silva LC, de Oliveira E Silva ED, Gomes AC. Evaluation of the muscle relaxant cyclobenzaprine after third-molar extraction. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011; 142:1154–1162. PMID: 21965488.
Article
42. Akadiri OA, Fasola AO, Arotiba JT. Evaluation of Pederson index as an instrument for predicting difficulty of third molar surgical extraction. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2009; 16:105–108. PMID: 19606189.
43. Pedersen GW. Oral surgery. Philadelphia: Saunders;1988.
44. Renton T, Smeeton N, McGurk M. Factors predictive of difficulty of mandibular third molar surgery. Br Dent J. 2001; 190:607–610. PMID: 11441899.
Article
45. Yuasa H, Kawai T, Sugiura M. Classification of surgical difficulty in extracting impacted third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002; 40:26–31. PMID: 11883966.
Article
46. Carvalho RW, do Egito Vasconcelos BC. Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty during removal of impacted lower third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 69:2714–2721. PMID: 21752507.
Article
47. Conrad SM, Blakey GH, Shugars DA, Marciani RD, Phillips C, White RP Jr. Patients' perception of recovery after third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999; 57:1288–1294. PMID: 10555792.
Article
48. Larsen PE. Alveolar osteitis after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars. Identification of the patient at risk. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1992; 73:393–397. PMID: 1574298.
49. Meechan JG, Macgregor ID, Rogers SN, Hobson RS, Bate JP, Dennison M. The effect of smoking on immediate post-extraction socket filling with blood and on the incidence of painful socket. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1988; 26:402–409. PMID: 3263883.
Article
50. Johnson WS, Blanton EE. An evaluation of 9-aminoacridine/Gelfoam to reduce dry socket formation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1988; 66:167–170. PMID: 3174049.
Article
51. Yoshii T, Hamamoto Y, Muraoka S, Furudoi S, Komori T. Differences in postoperative morbidity rates, including infection and dry socket, and differences in the healing process after mandibular third molar surgery in patients receiving 1-day or 3-day prophylaxis with lenampicillin. J Infect Chemother. 2002; 8:87–93. PMID: 11957126.
Article
52. Alexander RE. Dental extraction wound management: a case against medicating postextraction sockets. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000; 58:538–551. PMID: 10800910.
Article
53. Brekke JH, Bresner M, Reitman MJ. Effect of surgical trauma and polylactate cubes and granules on the incidence of alveolar osteitis in mandibular third molar extraction wounds. J Can Dent Assoc. 1986; 52:315–319. PMID: 3518884.
54. Adkisson SR, Harris PF. A statistical study of alveolar osteitis. U S Armed Forces Med J. 1956; 7:1749–1754. PMID: 13392176.
55. Berge TI, Gilhuus-Moe OT. Per- and post-operative variables of mandibular third-molar surgery by four general practitioners and one oral surgeon. Acta Odontol Scand. 1993; 51:389–397. PMID: 8304016.
Article
56. Sisk AL, Hammer WB, Shelton DW, Joy ED Jr. Complications following removal of impacted third molars: the role of the experience of the surgeon. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986; 44:855–859. PMID: 3464711.
Article
57. Eshghpour M, Moradi A, Nejat AH. Dry socket following tooth extraction in an Iranian Dental Center: incidence and risk factors. J Dent Mater Tech. 2013; 2:86–91.
58. Fillingim RB, King CD, Ribeiro-Dasilva MC, Rahim-Williams B, Riley JL 3rd. Sex, gender, and pain: a review of recent clinical and experimental findings. J Pain. 2009; 10:447–485. PMID: 19411059.
Article
59. Gerdle B, Björk J, Cöster L, Henriksson K, Henriksson C, Bengtsson A. Prevalence of widespread pain and associations with work status: a population study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008; 9:102. PMID: 18627605.
Article
60. Wijnhoven HA, de Vet HC, Picavet HS. Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders is systematically higher in women than in men. Clin J Pain. 2006; 22:717–724. PMID: 16988568.
Article
61. de Mos M, de Bruijn AG, Huygen FJ, Dieleman JP, Stricker BH, Sturkenboom MC. The incidence of complex regional pain syndrome: a population-based study. Pain. 2007; 129:12–20. PMID: 17084977.
Article
62. Tsang A, Von Korff M, Lee S, Alonso J, Karam E, Angermeyer MC, et al. Common chronic pain conditions in developed and developing countries: gender and age differences and comorbidity with depression-anxiety disorders. J Pain. 2008; 9:883–891. PMID: 18602869.
Article
63. LeResche L. Gender considerations in the epidemiology of chronic pain. Epidemiol Pain. 1999; 17:43–52.
64. Bastos JL, Gigante DP, Peres KG. Toothache prevalence and associated factors: a population based study in southern Brazil. Oral Dis. 2008; 14:320–326. PMID: 18449961.
65. Chia YY, Chow LH, Hung CC, Liu K, Ger LP, Wang PN. Gender and pain upon movement are associated with the requirements for postoperative patient-controlled iv analgesia: a prospective survey of 2,298 Chinese patients. Can J Anaesth. 2002; 49:249–255. PMID: 11861342.
66. Mattila K, Toivonen J, Janhunen L, Rosenberg PH, Hynynen M. Postdischarge symptoms after ambulatory surgery: first-week incidence, intensity, and risk factors. Anesth Analg. 2005; 101:1643–1650. PMID: 16301235.
Article
67. Taenzer AH, Clark C, Curry CS. Gender affects report of pain and function after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Anesthesiology. 2000; 93:670–675. PMID: 10969299.
Article
68. Rosseland LA, Stubhaug A. Gender is a confounding factor in pain trials: women report more pain than men after arthroscopic surgery. Pain. 2004; 112:248–253. PMID: 15561379.
Article
69. Fillingim RB. Sex, gender, and pain: women and men really are different. Curr Rev Pain. 2000; 4:24–30. PMID: 10998712.
Article
70. Keefe FJ, Lefebvre JC, Egert JR, Affleck G, Sullivan MJ, Caldwell DS. The relationship of gender to pain, pain behavior, and disability in osteoarthritis patients: the role of catastrophizing. Pain. 2000; 87:325–334. PMID: 10963912.
Article
71. Nakagawa Y, Ishii H, Nomura Y, Watanabe NY, Hoshiba D, Kobayashi K, et al. Third molar position: reliability of panoramic radiography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 65:1303–1308. PMID: 17577493.
Article
72. Abu Younis MH, Abu Hantash RO. Dry socket: frequency, clinical picture, and risk factors in a palestinian dental teaching center. Open Dent J. 2011; 5:7–12. PMID: 21559187.
73. Barbosa-Rebellato NL, Thomé AC, Costa-Maciel C, Oliveira J, Scariot R. Factors associated with complications of removal of third molars: a transversal study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011; 16:e376–e380. PMID: 21196877.
Article
74. Heasman PA, Jacobs DJ. A clinical investigation into the incidence of dry socket. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1984; 22:115–122. PMID: 6585221.
Article
75. Garcia AG, Grana PM, Sampedro FG, Diago MP, Rey JM. Does oral contraceptive use affect the incidence of complications after extraction of a mandibular third molar? Br Dent J. 2003; 194:453–455. PMID: 12778101.
Article
76. Catellani JE, Harvey S, Erickson SH, Cherkin D. Effect of oral contraceptive cycle on dry socket (localized alveolar osteitis). J Am Dent Assoc. 1980; 101:777–780. PMID: 6935267.
Article
77. Enkling N, Nicolay C, Bayer S, Mericske-Stern R, Utz KH. Investigating interocclusal perception in tactile teeth sensibility using symmetric and asymmetric analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2010; 14:683–690.
Article
78. Jacobs R, Van Steenberghe D. From osseoperception to implantmediated sensory-motor interactions and related clinical implications. J Oral Rehabil. 2006; 33:282–292. PMID: 16629883.
Article
79. Kazemi M, Geramipanah F, Negahdari R, Rakhshan V. Active tactile sensibility of single-tooth implants versus natural dentition: a split-mouth double-blind randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014; 16:947–955. PMID: 23490397.
Article
80. Goldberg MH, Nemarich AN, Marco WP 2nd. Complications after mandibular third molar surgery: a statistical analysis of 500 consecutive procedures in private practice. J Am Dent Assoc. 1985; 111:277–279. PMID: 3862695.
Article
81. Bruce RA, Frederickson GC, Small GS. Age of patients and morbidity associated with mandibular third molar surgery. J Am Dent Assoc. 1980; 101:240–245. PMID: 6931159.
82. Precious DS, Mercier P, Payette F. Risks and benefits of extraction of impacted third molars: a critical review of the literature. 2. J Can Dent Assoc. 1992; 58:845–852. PMID: 1393798.
83. Akadiri OA, Okoje VN, Arotiba JT. Identification of risk factors for short-term morbidity in third molar surgery. Odontostomatol Trop. 2008; 31:5–10. PMID: 19441261.
84. Adeyemo WL, Ogunlewe MO, Ladeinde AL, Hassan OO, Taiwo OA. A comparative study of surgical morbidity associated with mandibular third-molar surgery in young and aging populations. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2010; 11:E001–E008. PMID: 20953558.
Article
85. Adeyemo WL, Ogunlewe MO, Ladeinde AL, Abib GT, Gbotolorun OM, Olojede OC, et al. Prevalence and surgical morbidity of impacted mandibular third molar removal in the aging population: a retrospective study at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital. Afr J Med Med Sci. 2006; 35:479–483. PMID: 17722817.
Full Text Links
  • JKAOMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr