J Korean Med Assoc.  2007 Dec;50(12):1065-1071. 10.5124/jkma.2007.50.12.1065.

Anesthesia and Sedation

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Korea. drlimhj@korea.ac.kr

Abstract

Anesthetic care is usually provided for patients undergoing surgical procedures to make them unconscious and painless during surgery. Nowadays there are increasing therapeutic or diagnostic procedures performed outside operating room. Sedation is more frequently provided as healthcare during procedures for patient's comfort and safety by non-anesthesiologist or anesthesiologist. Early in 1999, ASA (the American Society of Anesthesiologists defined sedation and analgesia and established 4 states: minimal sedation, moderate sedation, deep sedation, and general anesthesia. Monitored anesthetic care implies the potential for a deep sedation and is always administered by an anesthesiologist. It is not always possible to predict how an individual patient will respond by nature of being a continuum of sedation. Hence, practitioners intending to induce a given level of sedation should be able to rescue patients whose level of sedation becomes deeper than initially intended. The standards for preoperative evaluation, intraoperative monitoring, anesthetic care, etc. are not different from those for general anesthesia.

Keyword

Sedation; Anesthesia; Sedation / analgesia; Monitored anesthesia care

MeSH Terms

Analgesia
Anesthesia*
Anesthesia, General
Conscious Sedation
Deep Sedation
Delivery of Health Care
Humans
Methods
Monitoring, Intraoperative
Operating Rooms

Reference

1. American Society of Anesthesiologists. Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology. 1996. 84:459–471.
2. American Society of Anesthesiologists, Task Force on Sedation and Analgesia by Non-Anesthesiologists. Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology. 2002. 96:1004–1017.
3. Hiller SC. Barash PG, Gullen BF, Stoelting RK, editors. Monitored anesthesia care Clinical anesthesia. Clinical anesthesia. 2001. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincot Williams & Wilkins;1239–1254.
4. Epstein BS. The american society of anesthesiologists efforts in developing guidelines for sedation and analgesia for non-anesthesiologist. Anesthesiology. 2003. 98:1261–1268.
Article
5. Kim ST. KSIVA. Anesthesiologist-controlled sedation and patient-controlled sedation. Sedation. 2004. Seoul: Eui-Hak Publishing & Printing;19–29.
6. Irwin MG, Thompson N, Kenny NC. Patient-maintained propofol sedation. Anaesthesa. 1997. 52:525–530.
Article
7. Newson C, Joshi GP, Victory R, White PF. Comparison of propofol administration techniques for sedation during monitored anesthesia care. Anesth Analg. 1995. 81:486–491.
Article
8. Leslie K, Absalom A, Kenny GN. Closed loop control of sedation for colonoscopy using bispectral index. Anesthesia. 2002. 57:693–697.
9. Milne SE, Kenny GNC. Future applications for TCI systems. Anesthesia. 1998. 53:S. 56–60.
Article
10. Saunders BP, Fukumoto M, Halligan S, Masaki T, Love S, Williams CB. Patient-administered nitrous oxide/oxygen inhalation provides effective sedation and analgesia for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1994. 40:418–421.
Article
11. Oei-Lim VLB, Kalkman CI, Makkes PC, Ooms WG. Patient-controlled versus anesthesiologist-controlled conscious sedation with propofol for dental treatment in anxious patients. Anesth Analg. 1998. 86:967–972.
Article
12. Herrick IA, Gelb AW, Tseng PS, Kirkby J. Patient-controlled sedation using propofol during interventional neuroradiologic procedures. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 1997. 9:237–241.
Article
13. Cook LB, Lockwood GG, Moore CM, Whitwarm JG. True patient-controlled sedation. Anaesthesia. 1993. 48:1039–1044.
Article
14. Rudkin GE, Osborne GA, Finn BP, Jarvis DA, Vickers D. Intraoperative patient-controlled sedation. Comparison of patientcontrolled propofol with patient-controlled midazolam. Anaesthesia. 1992. 47:376–381.
15. White PF, Negus JB. Sedative infusions during local and regional anesthesia: A comparison of midazolam and propofol. J Clin Anesth. 1991. 3:32–39.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKMA
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr