J Adv Prosthodont.  2016 Apr;8(2):125-130. 10.4047/jap.2016.8.2.125.

Does the maxillary anterior ratio in Korean adults follow the Golden Proportion?

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry and Advanced Dental Device Development Institute, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea. kblee@knu.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Bio-medical Research Institute, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
  • 3Department of Orthodontics, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Oral Science Research Center, Institute of Craniofacial Deformity, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of changes in the horizontal plane angle on the mesiodistal width ratios of the maxillary anterior teeth during the acquisition of frontal view photographs, derive these ratios for Korean adults on the basis of the data obtained, and analyze them using the Golden Proportion as a reference.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
In experiment I, 30 plaster casts were mounted on an articulator and positioned on the angle-measuring device with a center setting of 0°. The device was rotated to 10° in 1° increments in a counterclockwise direction. At each angle, photographs were obtained and analyzed. Experiment II was based on 60 patients who visited the Department of Prosthodontics at Kyungpook National University Dental Hospital from February 2012 to February 2015. The patients were divided into three groups [Male (M), Female (F), Total (M + F)]. Frontal views were obtained for all groups and analyzed.
RESULTS
From 1° to 10°, the relative mesiodistal width ratios for the maxillary anterior teeth showed no significant differences from those at 0°. In all three groups, the relative width ratio of the maxillary central incisor was smaller than that specified in the Golden Proportion; the opposite was true for the canine.
CONCLUSION
Our results suggest that the mesiodistal width ratios of the maxillary anterior teeth do not follow the Golden Proportion in Korean adults, and that a change in the horizontal plane angle from 1° to 10° during frontal photography does not affect these ratios.

Keyword

Korean adults; Maxillary anterior mesiodistal width ratio; Golden Proportion

MeSH Terms

Adult*
Casts, Surgical
Dental Articulators
Female
Gyeongsangbuk-do
Humans
Incisor
Photography
Prosthodontics
Tooth

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Angle-measuring device.

  • Fig. 2 Marking the heights of the contours of the maxillary anterior teeth with an Illustrator CC The mesiodistal width (red line) is the horizontal line connecting each vertical line (black lines).

  • Fig. 3 Measurement of mesiodistal widths from the frontal view. Measurements in experiments I and II were obtained in the same manner.

  • Fig. 4 The formula for the maxillary anterior mesiodistal width ratios measured on frontal photographs. Here, "a" represents the mesiodistal width of the left maxillary central incisor, "b" represents that of the lateral incisor, and "c" represents that of the canine *indicates the other side of the same tooth.

  • Fig. 5 Mesiodistal width ratios of the maxillary anterior teeth in relation to the Golden Proportion in the male, female, and total (male + female) groups. The lateral incisor width is always 1.0. *indicates a significant difference as per the one-sample t-test.


Cited by  1 articles

Analysis of the width ratio and wear rate of maxillary anterior teeth in the Korean population
Yeon-Ah Oh, Hong-So Yang, Sang-Won Park, Hyun-Pil Lim, Kwi-Dug Yun, Chan Park
J Adv Prosthodont. 2017;9(2):93-98.    doi: 10.4047/jap.2017.9.2.93.


Reference

1. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Porcelain veneers: a review of the literature. J Dent. 2000; 28:163–177.
2. Peck H, Peck S. A concept of facial esthetics. Angle Orthod. 1970; 40:284–318.
3. Ahila SC, Vaishnavi P, Muthu Kumar B. Comparative evaluation of maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth width with the length of index and little finger. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2014; 14:215–218.
4. Owens EG, Goodacre CJ, Loh PL, Hanke G, Okamura M, Jo KH, Muñoz CA, Naylor WP. A multicenter interracial study of facial appearance. Part 2: A comparison of intraoral parameters. Int J Prosthodont. 2002; 15:283–288.
5. Jones AR, Martin W. Comparing pink and white esthetic scores to layperson perception in the single-tooth implant patient. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29:1348–1353.
6. Lombardi RE. The principles of visual perception and their clinical application to denture esthetics. J Prosthet Dent. 1973; 29:358–382.
7. Levin EI. Dental esthetics and the golden proportion. J Prosthet Dent. 1978; 40:244–252.
8. Snow SR. Esthetic smile analysis of maxillary anterior tooth width: the golden percentage. J Esthet Dent. 1999; 11:177–184.
9. Richer P. Artistic Anatomy. New York: Watson-Guptill;1971.
10. Preston JD. The golden proportion revisited. J Esthet Dent. 1993; 5:247–251.
11. Forster A, Velez R, Antal M, Nagy K. Width ratios in the anterior maxillary region in a Hungarian population: addition to the golden proportion debate. J Prosthet Dent. 2013; 110:211–215.
12. Kang DW, Kim DG, Kim MJ, Kim SH, Kim HS, Dong JG, Bae AR, Seu JM, Song BK, Sim JS, An SK, Yang HS, Yeo IS, Oh SC, Woo YH, Yoon GD, Yoon MJ, Lee KB, Lee KW, Lee JB, Lee JH, Lee JH, Jeong YC, Jo KH, Han JS. The principle and clinical fixed prosthodontics. Seoul, Korea: DaehanNarae Publishing;2012. p. 32–33.
13. Zlatarić DK, Kristek E, Celebić A. Analysis of width/length ratios of normal clinical crowns of the maxillary anterior dentition: correlation between dental proportions and facial measurements. Int J Prosthodont. 2007; 20:313–315.
14. Duarte S Jr, Schnider P, Lorezon AP. The importance of width/length ratios of maxillary anterior permanent teeth in esthetic rehabilitation. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2008; 3:224–234.
15. Tsukiyama T, Marcushamer E, Griffin TJ, Arguello E, Magne P, Gallucci GO. Comparison of the anatomic crown width/length ratios of unworn and worn maxillary teeth in Asian and white subjects. J Prosthet Dent. 2012; 107:11–16.
16. Boyd JG. AACD accreditation process. Tex Dent J. 2005; 122:976–979.
17. Lee SL, Kim HJ, Son MK, Chung CH. Anthropometric analysis of maxillary anterior buccal bone of Korean adults using cone-beam CT. J Adv Prosthodont. 2010; 2:92–96.
18. Aoki H, Fukuyama T, Mita I, Ukiya M. Morphological study and comparison of the dental arch form of Japanese and American adults: a preliminary report. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 1970; 11:201–210.
19. Ali Fayyad M, Jamani KD, Agrabawi J. Geometric and mathematical proportions and their relations to maxillary anterior teeth. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006; 7:62–70.
20. Hasanreisoglu U, Berksun S, Aras K, Arslan I. An analysis of maxillary anterior teeth: facial and dental proportions. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 94:530–538.
Full Text Links
  • JAP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr