1. Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am. 1974. 18:269–296.
2. Weine FS, Kelly RF, Lio PJ. The effect of preparation procedures on original canal shape and on apical foramen shape. J Endod. 1975. 1:255–262.
Article
3. Alodeh MH, Doller R, Dummer PN. Shaping of simulated root canals in resin blocks using the step-back technique with K-files manipulated in a simple in/out filing motion. Int Endod J. 1989. 22:107–117.
Article
4. Abou-Rass M, Frank AL, Glick DH. The anticurvature filing method to prepare the curved root canal. J Am Dent Assoc. 1980. 101:792–794.
Article
5. Morgan LF, Mongomery S. An evaluation of the crown-down pressureless technique. J Endod. 1984. 10:491–498.
Article
6. Roane JB, Sabala CL, Duncanson MG. The "balance force" concept for instrumentation of curved canals. J Endod. 1985. 11:203–211.
7. Esposito PH, Cunningham CJ. A comparison of canal preparation with nickel-titanium and stainless steel instrument. J Endod. 1995. 21:173–176.
Article
8. Walia H, Brantley WA, Gerstein H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of nitinol root canal files. J Endod. 1988. 14:346–357.
Article
9. Bou Dagher FE, Yared GM. Comparison of three files to prepare curved root canal. J Endod. 1995. 21:264–265.
10. Glossen CR, Haller RH, Dove SB, Rio CE. A comparison of root canal preparation using Ni-Ti hand, Ni-Ti engine-driven, and K-flex endodontic instruments. J Endod. 1995. 21:146–151.
11. Hur YJ, Kim SK. Change in root canal configuration using different file types and techniques. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 1997. 22:291–304.
12. Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1971. 32:271–275.
Article
13. Caldwell JL. Change on working length following instrumentation of molar canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1976. 41:114–118.
14. Farber JP, Bernstein M. The effect of instrumentation on root canal length as measured with an electronic device. J Endod. 1983. 9:114–115.
Article
15. Kim BH, Kim YS, Lee YK. Working length change by instrumentation according to the canal curvature. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 1999. 24:623–627.
16. Schroeder KP, Walton RE, Rivera EM. Straight line access and coronal flaring: Effect on canal length. J Endod. 2002. 28:474–476.
Article
17. Davis RD, Marshall JG, Baumgartner JC. Effect of early coronal flaring on working length change in curved canals using rotary nickel-titanium versus stainless steel instruments. J Endod. 2002. 28:438–442.
Article
18. Thompson SA, Dummer PM. Shaping ability of Profile .04 taper series 29 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals: Part 1. Int Endod J. 1997. 30:1–7.
19. Thompson SA, Dummer PM. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals: Part 1. Int Endod J. 2000. 33:248–254.
Article
20. Bryant ST, Dummer PM, Pitoni C, Bourba M, Moghal S. Shaping ability of .04 and .06 taper Profile rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Int Endod J. 1999. 32:155–164.
Article
21. Bryant ST, Thompson SA, Al-Omari MA, Dummer PM. Shaping ability of Profile rotary nickel-titanium instruments with ISO sized tips in simulated root canals: Part 1. Int Endod J. 1998. 31:275–281.
Article
22. Kum KY, Spangberg L, Cha BY, Jung IY, Lee SJ, Lee CY. Shaping ability of three Profile rotary instrumentation techniques in simulated resin root canals. J Endod. 2000. 26:719–723.
Article
23. Senia SE, Johnson B, McSpadden J. The crown-down technique: a paradigm shift. interview by Donald E. Arens. Dent Today. 1996. 15:38–47.
24. Yun HH, Kim SK. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003. 95:228–233.
Article
25. Choi SD, Jin MU, Kim KO, Kim SK. Shaping ability of four rotary nickel-titanium instruments to prepare root canal at danger zone. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2004. 29(5):446–453.
Article