J Bacteriol Virol.  2012 Dec;42(4):263-275. 10.4167/jbv.2012.42.4.263.

Application of Metagenomic Techniques: Understanding the Unrevealed Human Microbiota and Explaining the in Clinical Infectious Diseases

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Microbiology, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea. kimwy@cau.ac.kr

Abstract

Uncultured microorganisms comprise the majority of the planet's biological diversity. In many environments, as many as 99% of the microorganisms cannot be cultured by standard techniques, and the uncultured fraction includes diverse organisms that are only distantly related to the cultured ones. Therefore, culture-independent methods are essential to understand the genetic diversity, population structure, and ecological roles of the majority of microorganisms. Recently, new techniques for studying microbial communities, collectively called metagenomics, have been developed to overcome the limitations of culturing. This review assesses the potential of metagenomic techniques to analyze the relative abundance of microbial species under varying human environmental conditions and to discover infectious causes of unexplained human diseases.

Keyword

Metagenomics; Sanger sequencing; Next-generation DNA sequencing

MeSH Terms

Biodiversity
Communicable Diseases
Genetic Variation
Humans
Metagenome
Metagenomics

Figure

  • Figure 1 In high-throughput shotgun Sanger sequencing, genomic DNA is fragmented, then cloned into a plasmid vector and transformed into E. coli. For each sequencing reaction, a single bacterial colony is picked and plasmid DNA isolated. Each cycle sequencing reaction takes place within a microliter-scale volume, generating a ladder of ddNTP-terminated, dye-labeled products that are subjected to high-resolution electrophoretic separation within one of 96 or 384 capillaries in one run of a sequencing instrument. As fluorescently labeled fragments of discrete sizes pass a detector, the four-channel emission spectrum is used to generate a sequencing trace (26).

  • Figure 2 Clonal amplification of sequencing features. The 454, Polonator, and SOLiD platforms rely on emulsion PCR20 to amplify clonal sequencing features. In brief, an in vitro-constructed adaptor flanked shotgun library (shown as gold and turquoise adaptors flanking unique inserts) is PCR amplified (that is, multi-template PCR, not multiplex PCR, as only a single primer pair is used, corresponding to the gold and turquoise adaptors) in the context of a water-in-oil emulsion. One of the PCR primers is tethered to the surface (5'-attached) of micron-scale beads that are also included in the reaction. A low template concentration results in most bead-containing compartments having either zero or one template molecule present. In productive emulsion compartments (where both a bead and template molecule are present), PCR amplicons are captured on the surface of the bead. After breaking the emulsion, beads bearing amplification products are selectively enriched. Each clonally amplified bead has PCR products on its surface corresponding to amplification of a single molecule from the template library (26).

  • Figure 3 Comparison of the microbial diversity in the oropharynx of bronchial asthma versus non-asthmatic persons.

  • Figure 4 UniFrac analysis of V3 16S sequences of the microbial community of oropharynx samples from bronchial asthma and non-asthmatic persons. (A) A jackknifed clustering of the environments in the UniFrac dataset. The numbers next to the nodes represent the number of times that particular node was observed in a random sampling from the whole dataset. (B) Principal component analysis scatter plot of the microbiota of individuals with bronchial asthma and healthy individuals (non-asthmatic persons, red; bronchial asthma, blue).

  • Figure 5 Diagram of mycobiome communities at the phylum level. (A) Distribution of mycobiomes between normal scalps and dandruff-afflicted scalps. (B) Distribution of genera belonging to the phylum Ascomycota in healthy and dandruff-afflicted scalps. (C) Distribution of genera belonging to the phylum Basidiomycota in healthy and dandruff-afflicted scalps.

  • Figure 6 Diagram of the fungal communities at the generic level. Comparison of genus frequencies in the mycobiomes of normal and dandruff-afflicted scalps.


Cited by  2 articles

Roles of Enteric Microbial Composition and Metabolism in Health and Diseases
Jung Mogg Kim
Korean J Gastroenterol. 2013;62(4):191-205.    doi: 10.4166/kjg.2013.62.4.191.

Molecular Methods for Studying the Human Microbiota
Yoon Hee Choi, Jin Chung, Hee Sam Na
J Bacteriol Virol. 2013;43(1):67-72.    doi: 10.4167/jbv.2013.43.1.67.


Reference

1. Staley JT, Konopka A. Measurement of in situ activities of nonphotosynthetic microorganisms in aquatic and terrestrial habitats. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1985. 39:321.
Article
2. Amann RI, Ludwig W, Schleifer KH. Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiol Rev. 1995. 59:143–169.
Article
3. Hugenholtz P, Goebel BM, Pace NR. Impact of culture-independent studies on the emerging phylogenetic view of bacterial diversity. J Bacteriol. 1998. 180:4765–4774.
Article
4. Hugenholtz P, Hooper SD, Kyrpides NC. Focus: Synergistetes. Environ Microbiol. 2009. 11:1327–1329.
5. Auguet JC, Barberan A, Casamayor EO. Global ecological patterns in uncultured Archaea. ISME J. 2010. 4:182–190.
Article
6. Giovannoni SJ, Britschgi TB, Moyer CL, Field KG. Genetic diversity in Sargasso Sea bacterioplankton. Nature. 1990. 345:60–63.
Article
7. Pace NR. A molecular view of microbial diversity and the biosphere. Science. 1997. 276:734–740.
Article
8. Rappé MS, Giovannoni SJ. The uncultured microbial majority. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2003. 57:369–394.
Article
9. Zhou X, Bent SJ, Schneider MG, Davis CC, Islam MR, Forney LJ. Characterization of vaginal microbial communities in adult healthy women using cultivation-independent methods. Microbiology. 2004. 150:2565–2573.
Article
10. Aas JA, Paster BJ, Stokes LN, Olsen I, Dewhirst FE. Defining the normal bacterial flora of the oral cavity. J Clin Microbiol. 2005. 43:5721–5732.
Article
11. Bogaert D, Keijser B, Huse S, Rossen J, Veenhoven R, van Gils E, et al. Variability and diversity of nasopharyngeal microbiota in children: a metagenomic analysis. PLoS One. 2011. 6:e17035.
Article
12. Greninger AL, Chen EC, Sittler T, Scheinerman A, Roubinian N, Yu G, et al. A metagenomic analysis of pandemic influenza A (2009 H1N1) infection in patients from North America. PLoS One. 2010. 5:e13381.
Article
13. Finkbeiner SR, Allred AF, Tarr PI, Klein EJ, Kirkwood CD, Wang D. Metagenomic analysis of human diarrhea: viral detection and discovery. PLoS Pathog. 2008. 4:e1000011.
Article
14. Gill SR, Pop M, Deboy RT, Eckburg PB, Turnbaugh PJ, Samuel BS, et al. Metagenomic analysis of the human distal gut microbiome. Science. 2006. 312:1355–1359.
Article
15. Bae JW. Recent Methodological Approaches to Human Microbiome. J Bacteriol Virol. 2011. 41:1–7.
Article
16. Sanger F, Air GM, Barrell BG, Brown NL, Coulson AR, Fiddes CA, et al. Nucleotide sequence of bacteriophage phi X174 DNA. Nature. 1977. 265:687–695.
17. Swerdlow H, Wu SL, Harke H, Dovichi NJ. Capillary gel electrophoresis for DNA sequencing. Laser-induced fluorescence detection with the sheath flow cuvette. J Chromatogr. 1990. 516:61–67.
18. Hunkapiller T, Kaiser RJ, Koop BF, Hood L. Large-scale and automated DNA sequence determination. Science. 1991. 254:59–67.
Article
19. Noguchi H, Park J, Takagi T. MetaGene: prokaryotic gene finding from environmental genome shotgun sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006. 34:5623–5630.
Article
20. Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC, Green P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res. 1998. 8:175–185.
Article
21. Keith CS, Hoang DO, Barrett BM, Feigelman B, Nelson MC, Thai H, et al. Partial sequence analysis of 130 randomly selected maize cDNA clones. Plant Physiol. 1993. 101:329–332.
Article
22. Richter DC, Ott F, Auch AF, Schmid R, Huson DH. MetaSim: a sequencing simulator for genomics and metagenomics. PLoS One. 2008. 3:e3373.
Article
23. Ronaghi M, Uhlén M, Nyrén P. A sequencing method based on real-time pyrophosphate. Science. 1998. 281:363. 365.
Article
24. Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, Attiya S, Bader JS, Bemben LA, et al. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature. 2005. 437:376–380.
25. Huse SM, Huber JA, Morrison HG, Sogin ML, Welch DM. Accuracy and quality of massively parallel DNA pyrosequencing. Genome Biol. 2007. 8:R143.
Article
26. Shendure J, Ji H. Next-generation DNA sequencing. Nat Biotechnol. 2008. 26:1135–1145.
Article
27. Rusk N, Kiermer V. Primer: Sequencing--the next generation. Nat Methods. 2008. 5:15.
Article
28. Schuster SC. Next-generation sequencing transforms today\'s biology. Nat Methods. 2008. 5:16–18.
Article
29. Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977. 74:5463–5467.
Article
30. Dressman D, Yan H, Traverso G, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Transforming single DNA molecules into fluorescent magnetic particles for detection and enumeration of genetic variations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003. 100:8817–8822.
Article
31. Hall N. Advanced sequencing technologies and their wider impact in microbiology. J Exp Biol. 2007. 210:1518–1525.
Article
32. Pettersson E, Lundeberg J, Ahmadian A. Generations of sequencing technologies. Genomics. 2009. 93:105–111.
Article
33. Ramsey CD, Gold DR, Litonjua AA, Sredl DL, Ryan L, Celedón JC. Respiratory illnesses in early life and asthma and atopy in childhood. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007. 119:150–156.
Article
34. Huffnagle GB. The microbiota and allergies/asthma. PLoS Pathog. 2010. 6:e1000549.
Article
35. Noverr MC, Huffnagle GB. The 'microflora hypothesis' of allergic diseases. Clin Exp Allergy. 2005. 35:1511–1520.
Article
36. Park HK, Ha MH, Park SG, Kim MN, Kim BJ, Kim W. Characterization of the fungal microbiota (mycobiome) in healthy and dandruff-afflicted human scalps. PLoS One. 2012. 7:e32847.
Article
37. Piérard-Franchimont C, Xhauflaire-Uhoda E, Piérard GE. Revisiting dandruff. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2006. 28:311–318.
Article
38. Ranganathan S, Mukhopadhyay T. Dandruff: the most commercially exploited skin disease. Indian J Dermatol. 2010. 55:130–134.
Article
39. Jo JH, Jang HS, Ko HC, Kim MB, Oh CK, Kwon YW, et al. Pustular psoriasis and the Kobner phenomenon caused by allergic contact dermatitis from zinc pyrithione-containing shampoo. Contact Dermatitis. 2005. 52:142–144.
Article
40. Piérard GE, Piérard-Franchimont C. Squamometry in acute photodamage. Skin Res Technol. 1995. 1:137–139.
Article
41. Gupta AK, Madzia SE, Batra R. Etiology and Management of Seborrheic Dermatitis. Dermatology. 2004. 208:89–93.
Article
42. Leyden JJ, McGinley KJ, Kligman AM. Role of microorganisms in dandruff. Arch Dermatol. 1976. 112:333–338.
Article
43. McGinley KJ, Leyden JJ, Marples RR, Kligman AM. Quantitative microbiology of the scalp in non-dandruff, dandruff, and seborrheic dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol. 1975. 64:401–405.
Article
44. Guého E, Boekhout T, Ashbee HR, Guillot J, Van Belkum A, Faergemann J. The role of Malassezia species in the ecology of human skin and as pathogens. Med Mycol. 1998. 36:220–229.
45. Sugita T, Takashima M, Shinoda T, Suto H, Unno T, Tsuboi R, et al. New yeast species, Malassezia dermatis, isolated from patients with atopic dermatitis. J Clin Microbiol. 2002. 40:1363–1367.
Article
46. Erchiga VC, Florencio VD. Malassezia species in skin diseases. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2002. 15:133–142.
47. Gupta AK, Kohli Y, Faergemann J, Summerbell RC. Epidemiology of Malassezia yeasts associated with pityriasis versicolor in Ontario, Canada. Med Mycol. 2001. 39:199–206.
Article
48. Prohić A. Identification of Malassezia species isolated from scalp skin of patients with psoriasis and healthy subjects. Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2003. 11:10–16.
49. Sugita T, Suto H, Unno T, Tsuboi R, Ogawa H, Shinoda T, et al. Molecular analysis of Malassezia microflora on the skin of atopic dermatitis patients and healthy subjects. J Clin Microbiol. 2001. 39:3486–3490.
Article
50. Kirk PM, Cannon PF, Minter DW, JA S, editors. Dictionary of the Fungi. 2008. 10th ed. Wallingford: CABI.
51. Pan W, Liao W, Hagen F, Theelen B, Shi W, Meis JF, et al. Meningitis caused by Filobasidium uniguttulatum: case report and overview of the literature. Mycoses. 2012. 55:105–109.
52. Kwon-Chung KJ. Perfect state of Cryptococcus uniguttulatus. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1977. 27:293–299.
53. Kwon-Chung KJ, Boekhout T, Wickes B, Fell J. Heitman J, Kozel TR, Kwon-Chung KJ, Perfect JR, Casadevall A, editors. Systematics of the Genus Cryptococcus and its type species C. neoformans. Cryptococcus: From human pathogen to model yeast. 2011. Washington, DC: ASM press;3–16.
54. Fell JW, Boekhout T, Fonseca A, Scorzetti G, Statzell-Tallman A. Biodiversity and systematics of basidiomycetous yeasts as determined by large-subunit rDNA D1/D2 domain sequence analysis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2000. 50:1351–1371.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JBV
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr