Hanyang Med Rev.  2014 Nov;34(4):181-184. 10.7599/hmr.2014.34.4.181.

Genomics in Organ Transplantation

Affiliations
  • 1Division of HBP Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hanyang Medical Center, Hanyang University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 2Center for RNA research, Institute for Basic Science, Seoul, Korea. dkseo@snu.ac.kr
  • 3School of Biological Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

The understanding of genetic diversities in humans by applying the state of the art genomic technologies has been accumulated and enriched since the last decades. Even in organ transplantation, these genomic technologies have not yet been widely applied and have less impact, except Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) matching. Pre- and post-operative care including surgical techniques in organ transplantation has improved reducing morbidity and mortality, but there are limitations and obstacles due to personal diversities coming from genetic variation. For this reason, the therapy combined with genomic information would be promising and beneficial in organ transplantation and would expect to give a new paradigm in personalized medicine in the near future. In this review, we introduce Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technology and summarize potential benefits of these technologies in organ transplantation.

Keyword

Genomics; High-Thoughput Nucleotide Sequencing; Organ Transplantation; Graft Rejection

MeSH Terms

Genetic Variation
Genomics*
Graft Rejection
Humans
Leukocytes
Mortality
Organ Transplantation*
Transplants*
Precision Medicine

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Application of genomics in organ transplantation. Gathering samples are available in a point of time which are indicated by thick arrows.


Cited by  1 articles

Cutting Edge Technologies in Organ Transplantation
Dongho Choi
Hanyang Med Rev. 2014;34(4):143-144.    doi: 10.7599/hmr.2014.34.4.143.


Reference

1. Morris PJ. Transplantation--a medical miracle of the 20th century. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351:2678–2680.
Article
2. Terasaki PI. Deduction of the fraction of immunologic and non-immunologic failure in cadaver donor transplants. Clin Transpl. 2003; 449–452.
3. Lander ES. Initial impact of the sequencing of the human genome. Nature. 2011; 470:187–197.
Article
4. van de Vijver MJ, He YD, van't Veer LJ, Dai H, Hart AA, Voskuil DW, et al. A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347:1999–2009.
Article
5. Klein RJ, Zeiss C, Chew EY, Tsai JY, Sackler RS, Haynes C, et al. Complement factor H polymorphism in age-related macular degeneration. Science. 2005; 308:385–389.
Article
6. Ozaki K, Ohnishi Y, Iida A, Sekine A, Yamada R, Tsunoda T, et al. Functional SNPs in the lymphotoxin-alpha gene that are associated with susceptibility to myocardial infarction. Nat Genet. 2002; 32:650–654.
Article
7. Gibbs RA, Belmont JW, Hardenbol P, Willis TD, Yu F, Yang H, et al. The international HapMap project. Nature. 2003; 426:789–796.
Article
8. Londin E, Yadav P, Surrey S, Kricka LJ, Fortina P. Use of linkage analysis, genome-wide association studies, and next-generation sequencing in the identification of disease-causing mutations. Methods Mol Biol. 2013; 1015:127–146.
Article
9. Hauser P, Schwarz C, Mitterbauer C, Regele HM, Muhlbacher F, Mayer G, et al. Genome-wide gene-expression patterns of donor kidney biopsies distinguish primary allograft function. Lab Invest. 2004; 84:353–361.
Article
10. Bahassi el M, Stambrook PJ. Next-generation sequencing technologies: breaking the sound barrier of human genetics. Mutagenesis. 2014; 29:303–310.
Article
11. Buermans HP, den Dunnen JT. Next generation sequencing technology: Advances and applications. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014; 1842:1932–1941.
Article
12. Metzker ML. Sequencing technologies - the next generation. Nat Rev Genet. 2010; 11:31–46.
Article
13. Mardis ER. Next-generation DNA sequencing methods. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2008; 9:387–402.
Article
14. Koboldt DC, Steinberg KM, Larson DE, Wilson RK, Mardis ER. The next-generation sequencing revolution and its impact on genomics. Cell. 2013; 155:27–38.
Article
15. Chen Y, Zhang H, Xiao X, Jia Y, Wu W, Liu L, et al. Peripheral blood transcriptome sequencing reveals rejection-relevant genes in long-term heart transplantation. Int J Cardiol. 2013; 168:2726–2733.
Article
16. Snyder TM, Khush KK, Valantine HA, Quake SR. Universal noninvasive detection of solid organ transplant rejection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108:6229–6234.
Article
17. Hollander Z, Chen V, Sidhu K, Lin D, Ng RT, Balshaw R, et al. Predicting acute cardiac rejection from donor heart and pre-transplant recipient blood gene expression. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013; 32:259–265.
Article
18. Hashmi SK, Baranov E, Gonzalez A, Olthoff K, Shaked A. Genomics of liver transplant injury and regeneration. Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2014.
Article
19. Solez K, Colvin RB, Racusen LC, Haas M, Sis B, Mengel M, et al. Banff 07 classification of renal allograft pathology: updates and future directions. Am J Transplant. 2008; 8:753–760.
Article
20. Kurian S, Grigoryev Y, Head S, Campbell D, Mondala T, Salomon DR. Applying genomics to organ transplantation medicine in both discovery and validation of biomarkers. Int Immunopharmacol. 2007; 7:1948–1960.
Article
21. Perkins D, Verma M, Park KJ. Advances of genomic science and systems biology in renal transplantation: a review. Semin Immunopathol. 2011; 33:211–218.
Article
Full Text Links
  • HMR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr