Healthc Inform Res.  2016 Apr;22(2):142-150. 10.4258/hir.2016.22.2.142.

Current Status of Nursing Informatics Education in Korea

Affiliations
  • 1College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. hapark@snu.ac.kr
  • 2Research Institute of Nursing Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Aeromedical Center, Korean Air, Busan, Korea.
  • 4Department of Nursing, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
  • 5Global Healthcare Center, Korea Health Industry Development Institute, Cheongju, Korea.
  • 6Department of Nursing, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract


OBJECTIVES
This study presents the current status of nursing informatics education, the content covered in nursing informatics courses, the faculty efficacy, and the barriers to and additional supports for teaching nursing informatics in Korea.
METHODS
A set of questionnaires consisting of an 18-item questionnaire for nursing informatics education, a 6-item questionnaire for faculty efficacy, and 2 open-ended questions for barriers and additional supports were sent to 204 nursing schools via email and the postal service. Nursing schools offering nursing informatics were further asked to send their syllabuses. The subjects taught were analyzed using nursing informatics competency categories and other responses were tailed using descriptive statistics.
RESULTS
A total of 72 schools (35.3%) responded to the survey, of which 38 reported that they offered nursing informatics courses in their undergraduate nursing programs. Nursing informatics courses at 11 schools were taught by a professor with a degree majoring in nursing informatics. Computer technology was the most frequently taught subject (27 schools), followed by information systems used for practice (25 schools). The faculty efficacy was 3.76 ± 0.86 (out of 5). The most frequently reported barrier to teaching nursing informatics (n = 9) was lack of awareness of the importance of nursing informatics. Training and educational opportunities was the most requested additional support.
CONCLUSIONS
Nursing informatics education has increased during the last decade in Korea. However, the proportions of faculty with degrees in nursing informatics and number of schools offering nursing informatics courses have not increased much. Thus, a greater focus is needed on training faculty and developing the courses.

Keyword

Nursing Informatics; Nursing Education Research; Competency-Based Education

MeSH Terms

Competency-Based Education
Education*
Electronic Mail
Humans
Information Systems
Korea*
Nursing Education Research
Nursing Informatics*
Nursing*
Postal Service
Schools, Nursing
Tail

Cited by  2 articles

Development of a Standardized Curriculum for Nursing Informatics in Korea
Myonghwa Park, Bonkhe Brian Dlamini, Jahyeon Kim, Min-Jung Kwak, Insook Cho, Mona Choi, Jisan Lee, Yul Ha Min, Bu Kyung Park, Seonah Lee
Healthc Inform Res. 2022;28(4):343-354.    doi: 10.4258/hir.2022.28.4.343.

Technological Challenges and Solutions in Emergency Remote Teaching for Nursing: An International Cross-Sectional Survey
Eunjoo Jeon, Laura-Maria Peltonen, Lorraine J. Block, Charlene Ronquillo, Jude L. Tayaben, Raji Nibber, Lisiane Pruinelli, Erika Lozada Perezmitre, Janine Sommer, Maxim Topaz, Gabrielle Jacklin Eler, Henrique Yoshikazu Shishido, Shanti Wardaningsih, Sutantri Sutantri, Samira Ali, Dari Alhuwail, Alaa Abd-Alrazaq, Laila Akhu-Zaheya, Ying-Li Lee, Shao-Hui Shu, Jisan Lee
Healthc Inform Res. 2024;30(1):49-59.    doi: 10.4258/hir.2024.30.1.49.


Reference

1. Greiner AC, Knebel E. Health professions education: a bridge to quality. Washington (DC): National Academies Press;2003.
2. Moen A, Mæland Knudsen LM. Nursing informatics: decades of contribution to health informatics. Healthc Inform Res. 2013; 19(2):86–92.
Article
3. Park H, Cho I, Kim YA, Kim E, Kim J, Kim JE. Nursing informatics (Korean edition). Seoul: Hyunmoon;2012.
4. American Nurses Association. The scope of practice of nursing informatics and the standards of practice and professional performance for the informatics nurse specialist. Washington (DC): American Nurses Association;2001.
5. American Association of Colleges of Nursing. The essentials of baccalaureate education for professional nursing practice. Washington (DC): American Association of Colleges of Nursing;2008.
6. McNeil BJ, Odom SK. Nursing informatics education in the United States: proposed undergraduate curriculum. Health Inform J. 2000; 6(1):32–38.
Article
7. The TIGER Initiative. Informatics competencies for every practicing nurse: recommendations from the TIGER collaborative [Internet]. [place unknown]: The TIGER Initiative;2010. cited at 2016 Mar 18. Available from: http://www.himss.org/ResourceLibrary/genResource-DetailPDF.aspx?ItemNumber=44660.
8. Spencer JA. Integrating informatics in undergraduate nursing curricula: using the QSEN framework as a guide. J Nurs Educ. 2012; 51(12):697–701.
Article
9. Ozbolt JG, Saba VK. A brief history of nursing informatics in the United States of America. Nurs Outlook. 2008; 56(5):199–205.
Article
10. Thompson BW, Skiba DJ. Informatics in the nursing curriculum: a national survey of nursing informatics requirements in nursing curricula. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2008; 29(5):312–317.
11. Park HA, Kim JE, Yang YH, Hyun SY. A survey study of nursing informatics education in Korea. J Korean Soc Med Inform. 1999; 5(1):11–25.
Article
12. Yom YH, Kim JE, Chun BC, Choi S, Whang DH, Park KM, et al. Development of standardized and competency-based curriculum in nursing informatics. J Korean Soc Med Inform. 2007; 13(3):227–236.
Article
13. Yun ES. Study on the curriculum of gerontological nursing: baccalaureate degree programs (BSN) in Korea. J Korean Acad Soc Nurs Educ. 2008; 14(2):188–194.
Article
14. Graves JR, Corcoran S. The study of nursing informatics. Image J Nurs Sch. 1989; 21(4):227–231.
Article
15. Yi CR, Kwon NW. Development of a teacher-efficacy scale for health education teachers. J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs. 2008; 19(2):247–259.
16. Adamson K. Integrating human patient simulation into associate degree nursing curricula: faculty experiences, barriers, and facilitators. Clin Simul Nurs. 2010; 6(3):e75–e81.
17. Burla L, Knierim B, Barth J, Liewald K, Duetz M, Abel T. From text to codings: intercoder reliability assessment in qualitative content analysis. Nurs Res. 2008; 57(2):113–117.
18. Moss JA, Elias BL. Education in nursing informatics. In : Berner ES, editor. Informatics education in healthcare. London: Springer;2014. p. 59–75.
19. Kim J, Mun M, Kim J. A study on computer education curriculum at school: focused on the seventh common basic national curriculum. J Korea Comput Ind Educ Soc. 2002; 3(2):125–140.
20. Maag MM. Nursing students' attitudes toward technology: a national study. Nurse Educ. 2006; 31(3):112–118.
21. Nugent KE, Bradshaw MJ, Kito N. Teacher self-efficacy in new nurse educators. J Prof Nurs. 1999; 15(4):229–237.
Article
22. Topaz M, Ronquillo C, Peltonen LM, Pruinelli L, Sarmiento RF, Badger MK, et al. Advancing nursing informatics in the next decade: recommendations from an international survey. In : Proceedings of the 13th International Congress in Nursing Informatics; 2016 Jun 25-29; Geneva, Switzerland. Forthcoming.
23. Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: principles and methods. 7th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;2004.
Full Text Links
  • HIR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr