Healthc Inform Res.  2016 Apr;22(2):101-109. 10.4258/hir.2016.22.2.101.

Association of EMR Adoption with Minority Health Care Outcome Disparities in US Hospitals

• Choi JY
• Kuo YF
• Goodwin JS
• Lee J

• KMID: 2166944
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2016.22.2.101

Abstract

OBJECTIVES
Disparities in healthcare among minority groups can result in disparate treatments for similar severities of symptoms, unequal access to medical care, and a wide deviation in health outcomes. Such racial disparities may be reduced via use of an Electronic Medical Record (EMR) system. However, there has been little research investigating the impact of EMR systems on the disparities in health outcomes among minority groups.
METHODS
This study examined the impact of EMR systems on the following four outcomes of black patients: length of stay, inpatient mortality rate, 30-day mortality rate, and 30-day readmission rate, using patient and hospital data from the Medicare Provider Analysis and Review and the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society between 2000 and 2007. The difference-in-difference research method was employed with a generalized linear model to examine the association of EMR adoption on health outcomes for minority patients while controlling for patient and hospital characteristics.
RESULTS
We examined the association between EMR adoption and the outcomes of minority patients, specifically black patients. However, after controlling for patient and hospital characteristics we could not find any significant changes in the four health outcomes of minority patients before and after EMR implementation.
CONCLUSIONS
EMR systems have been reported to support better coordinated care, thus encouraging appropriate treatment for minority patients by removing potential sources of bias from providers. Also, EMR systems may improve the quality of care provided to patients via increased responsiveness to care processes that are required to be more time-sensitive and through improved communication. However, we did not find any significant benefit for minority groups after EMR adoption.

Keyword

Electronic Medical Records; Length of Stay; Mortality

MeSH Terms

Bias (Epidemiology)
Delivery of Health Care
Electronic Health Records
Humans
Inpatients
Length of Stay
Linear Models
Medicare
Minority Groups
Minority Health*
Mortality

Reference

1. Rubio M, Williams DR. The social dimension of race. In : Beech BM, Goodman M, editors. Race and research: perspectives on minority participation in health studies. Washington (DC): American Public Health Association;2004. p. 1–25.

2. Smedley BD, Stith AY, Nelson AR. Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Washington (DC): National Academies Press;2003.

3. Lee J, Dowd B. Effect of health information technology expenditure on patient level cost. Healthc Inform Res. 2013; 19(3):215–221.

4. Charles D, Gabriel M, Furukawa MF. Adoption of electronic health record systems among U.S. non-federal acute care hospitals: 2008-2013 [Internet]. Washington (DC): Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology;2014. cited 2016 Mar 30. Available from: https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/oncdatabrief16.pdf.

5. Joynt KE, Orav EJ, Jha AK. Thirty-day readmission rates for Medicare beneficiaries by race and site of care. JAMA. 2011; 305(7):675–681.

6. Bhalla R, Kalkut G. Could Medicare readmission policy exacerbate health care system inequity? Ann Intern Med. 2010; 152(2):114–117.

7. Virnig BA, Lurie N, Huang Z, Musgrave D, McBean AM, Dowd B. Racial variation in quality of care among Medicare+Choice enrollees. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002; 21(6):224–230.

8. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. National healthcare disparities report 2011 [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality;2012. cited at 2016 Mar 30. Available from: http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/nhqrdr/nhdr11/nhdr11.pdf.

9. Arce CM, Goldstein BA, Mitani AA, Lenihan CR, Winkelmayer WC. Differences in access to kidney transplantation between Hispanic and non-Hispanic whites by geographic location in the United States. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013; 8(12):2149–2157.

10. Jencks SF, Williams MV, Coleman EA. Rehospitalizations among patients in the Medicare fee-for-service program. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360(14):1418–1428.

11. Berges IM, Kuo YF, Ostir GV, Granger CV, Graham JE, Ottenbacher KJ. Gender and ethnic differences in rehabilitation outcomes following hip replacement surgery. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2008; 87(7):567–572.

12. Lee J, Kuo YF, Goodwin JS. The effect of electronic medical record adoption on outcomes in US hospitals. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013; 13:39.

13. McCullough JS, Casey M, Moscovice I, Prasad S. The effect of health information technology on quality in US hospitals. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010; 29(4):647–654.

14. Fonkych K, Taylor R. The state and pattern of health information technology adoption. Santa Monica (CA): Rand Corporation;2005.

15. Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care. 1998; 36(1):8–27.

16. Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S. How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Q J Econ. 2004; 119(1):249–275.

17. Drye EE, Normand SL, Wang Y, Ross JS, Schreiner GC, Han L, et al. Comparison of hospital risk-standardized mortality rates calculated by using in-hospital and 30-day models: an observational study with implications for hospital profiling. Ann Intern Med. 2012; 156(1 Pt 1):19–26.

18. Lee J, McCullough JS, Town RJ. The impact of health information technology on hospital productivity. RAND J Econ. 2013; 44(3):545–568.

19. DRG expert: a comprehensive guidebook to the DRG classification system. Reston (VA): Ingenix;2007.

20. Longhurst CA, Parast L, Sandborg CI, Widen E, Sullivan J, Hahn JS, et al. Decrease in hospital-wide mortality rate after implementation of a commercially sold computerized physician order entry system. Pediatrics. 2010; 126(1):14–21.

21. Lee J. The impact of health information technology on disparity of process of care. Int J Equity Health. 2015; 14:34.

22. Acevedo-Garcia D, Osypuk TL, McArdle N, Williams DR. Toward a policy-relevant analysis of geographic and racial/ethnic disparities in child health. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008; 27(2):321–333.

23. Miller AR, Tucker C. Can healthcare information technology save babies? J Polit Econ. 2011; 119(2):289–324.

24. Rosko MD. Performance of US teaching hospitals: a panel analysis of cost inefficiency. Health Care Manag Sci. 2004; 7(1):7–16.

25. Koenig L, Dobson A, Book R, Chen Y. Comparing hospital costs: adjusting for differences in teaching status and other hospital characteristics. Falls Church (VA): The Lewin Group;2005.