1. Lee Y, Chang H. Ubiquitous health in Korea: progress, barriers, and prospects. Healthc Inform Res. 2012; 18(4):242–251.
Article
2. Bae JK, Jeong HM. An empirical study on the determinants factors by including functional attributes of smart phone adoption. e-Business Stud. 2008; 9(4):337–361.
Article
3. Ministry of Public Administration and Security. 2011 National informatization white paper. Seoul, Korea: Ministry of Public Administration and Security;2011.
4. Boulos MN, Wheeler S, Tavares C, Jones R. How smartphones are changing the face of mobile and participatory healthcare: an overview, with example from eCAALYX. Biomed Eng Online. 2011; 10:24.
Article
6. Putzer GJ, Park Y. The effects of innovation factors on smartphone adoption among nurses in community hospitals. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2010; 7:1b.
7. Nolan T. A smarter way to practise. BMJ. 2011; 342:d1124.
Article
8. Putzer GJ, Park Y. Are physicians likely to adopt emerging mobile technologies? Attitudes and innovation factors affecting smartphone use in the Southeastern United States. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2012; 9:1b.
10. Yeo K, Lee K, Kim JM, Kim TH, Choi YH, Jeong WJ, et al. Pitfalls and Security Measures for the Mobile EMR System in Medical Facilities. Healthc Inform Res. 2012; 18(2):125–135.
Article
11. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading (MA): Addison-Wesley;1975.
12. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag Sci. 1989; 35(8):982–1003.
Article
13. Delone WH, McLean ER. Information system success: the quest for the dependent variable. Inf Syst Res. 1992; 3(1):60–95.
14. DeLone WH, McLean ER. The DeLone and McLean Model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J Manag Inf Syst. 2003; 19(4):9–30.
Article
15. Kim D, Chang H. Key functional characteristics in designing and operating health information websites for user satisfaction: an application of the extended technology acceptance model. Int J Med Inform. 2007; 76(11-12):790–800.
Article
16. Chang H. Application of the extended technology acceptance model to picture archiving and communication systems in dental hospitals. J Korean Soc Med Inform. 2009; 15(3):265–272.
Article
17. Kim SH. Moderating effects of job relevance and experience on mobile wireless technology acceptance: adoption of a smartphone by individuals. Inf Manag. 2008; 45(6):387–393.
Article
18. Ismail WK, Kit PC, Buhari N, Muzaini A. Acceptance of smartphone in enhancing patient-caregivers relationship. J Technol Manag Innov. 2012; 7(3):71–79.
Article
19. Choi JS, Yi B, Park JH, Choi K, Jung J, Park SW, Rhee PL. The uses of the smartphone for doctors: an empirical study from Samsung Medical Center. Healthc Inform Res. 2011; 17(2):131–138.
Article
20. Takao H, Murayama Y, Ishibashi T, Karagiozov KL, Abe T. A new support system using a mobile device (smartphone) for diagnostic image display and treatment of stroke. Stroke. 2012; 43(1):236–239.
Article
21. Lee JO, Whang J, Kang S, Lee S. Extended TAM for accepting mobile devices including functional attributes: the case of cellular phone. J Inf Technol Appl Manag. 2006; 13(1):39–66.
22. Oliva TA, Oliver RL, MacMillan IC. A catastrophe model for developing service satisfaction strategies. J Mark. 1992; 56(3):83–95.
Article
23. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991; 50(2):179–211.
Article
24. Kim H, Kim J. An empirical research on important factors of mobile internet usage. J MIS Res. 2002; 12(3):89–113.
25. Park Y, Chen JV. Acceptance and adoption of the innovative use of smartphone. Ind Manag Data Syst. 2007; 107(9):1349–1365.
Article