Healthc Inform Res.  2012 Mar;18(1):44-56. 10.4258/hir.2012.18.1.44.

Application of Social Network Analysis to Health Care Sectors

• Jang HL
• Lee YS
• An JY

• KMID: 2166617
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2012.18.1.44

Abstract

OBJECTIVES
This study aimed to examine the feasibility of social network analysis as a valuable research tool for indicating a change in research topics in health care and medicine.
METHODS
Papers used in the analysis were collected from the PubMed database at the National Library of Medicine. After limiting the search to papers affiliated with the National Institutes of Health, 27,125 papers were selected for the analysis. From these papers, the top 100 non-duplicate and most studied Medical Subject Heading terms were extracted. NetMiner V.3 was used for analysis. Weighted degree centrality was applied to the analysis to compare the trends in the change of research topics. Changes in the core keywords were observed for the entire group and in three-year intervals.
RESULTS
The core keyword with the highest centrality value was "Risk Factor," followed by "Molecular Sequence Data," "Neoplasms," "Signal Transduction," "Brain," and "Amino Acid Sequence." Core keywords varied between time intervals, changing from "Molecular Sequence Data" to "Risk Factors" over time. "Risk Factors" was added as a new keyword and its social network was expanded. The slope of the keywords also varied over time: "Molecular Sequence Data," with a high centrality value, had a decreasing slope at certain intervals, whereas "SNP," with a low centrality value, had an increasing slope at certain intervals.
CONCLUSIONS
The social network analysis method is useful for tracking changes in research topics over time. Further research should be conducted to confirm the usefulness of this method in health care and medicine.

Keyword

Bibliometrics; Knowledge Bases; Medical Subject Headings; Periodicals as Topic; National Institutes of Health

MeSH Terms

Bibliometrics
Delivery of Health Care
Health Care Sector
Knowledge Bases
Medical Subject Headings
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
National Library of Medicine (U.S.)
Periodicals as Topic
Track and Field

Figure

• 

  Figure 1 Keywords network of 190 in National Institutes of Health after pruning off 100 degree below (1967-2010, n = 61).

• 

  Figure 2 Keywords network in National Institutes of Health After pruning off 25 degree below (before 2000 year, n = 57).

• 

  Figure 3 Keywords network in National Institutes of Health after pruning off 28 degree below (2000-2002, n = 60).

• 

  Figure 4 Keywords network in National Institutes of Health after pruning off 30 degree below (2003-2005, n = 60).

• 

  Figure 5 Keywords network in National Institutes of Health after pruning off 27 degree below (2006-2008, n = 60).

• 

  Figure 6 Keywords network in National Institutes of Health after pruning off 27 degree below (2009-2010, n = 53).

Reference

1. National Academy of Medicine of Korea. Korean Medical Research Report 2006. 2007. Seoul, Korea: National Academy of Medicine of Korea;15.

2. Synnestvedt MB, Chen C, Holmes JH. CiteSpace II: visualization and knowledge discovery in bibliographic databases. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005. 724–728.

3. Bernstam EV, Herskovic JR, Aphinyanaphongs Y, Aliferis CF, Sriram MG, Hersh WR. Using citation data to improve retrieval from MEDLINE. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006. 13:96–105.

4. Jang HR, Kang GW, Lee YS, Tak YJ. An analysis of medical articles published domestically and abroad by Korean researchers from 1960 to 2008. J Korean Soc Libr Inf Sci. 2011. 45:259–277.

5. He Q. Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis. Libr Trends. 1999. 48:133–159.

6. Mane KK, Borner K. Mapping topics and topic bursts in PNAS. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004. 101:Suppl 1. 5287–5290.

7. Jung M, Chung D. Co-author and keyword networks and their clustering appearance in preventive medicine fields in Korea: analysis of papers in the Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, 1991-2006. J Prev Med Public Health. 2008. 41:1–9.

8. Jung M. Academic research activities and their co-author and keyword network in epidemiology fields: analysis of papers in the Korean Journal of Epidemiology, 1991-2006. Korean J Epidemiol. 2008. 30:60–72.

9. Kang JO, Park SH. Analysis of scientific publication networks among medical schools in Korea. Healthc Inform Res. 2010. 16:100–119.

10. Jeong S, Lee SK, Kim HG. Knowledge structure of Korean medical informatics: a social network analysis of articles in journal and proceedings. Healthc Inform Res. 2010. 16:52–59.

11. Lee SK, Jeong S, Kim HG, Yom YH. A social network analysis of research topics in Korean nursing science. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2011. 41:623–632.

12. Lee YS. Research network analysis for the national science knowledge map. 2010. Seoul, Korea: Korea Research Council of Fundamental Science and Technology.

13. Sohn DK. Generation and analysis of the research network for colorectal neoplasms dissertation. 2011. Cheongju, Korea: Chungbuk National University.

14. Price DD. The pattern of bibliographic references indicates the nature of the scientific research front. Science. 1965. 149:510–515.

15. Small H. Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 1973. 24:265–269.

16. Chen C. Searching for intellectual turning points: progressive knowledge domain visualization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004. 101:Suppl 1. 5303–5310.

17. Callon M, Courtial JP, Laville F. Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: the case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics. 1991. 22:155–205.

18. Chung YM, Han JY. Mapping knowledge structure of science and technology based on university research domain analysis. J Korean Soc Inf Manage. 2009. 26:195–210.

19. Mane KK, Borner K. Mapping topics and topic bursts in PNAS. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004. 101:Suppl 1. 5287–5290.

20. Garfield E. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA. 2006. 295:90–93.

21. Ding Y, Chowdhury GG, Foo S. Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis. Inf Process Manag. 2001. 37:817–842.

22. Wang X, Wang J, Ma F, Hu C. The "Small-World" characteristic of author co-words network. Proceedings of the International Conference on WICOM. 2007. 3717–3720.

23. Van Raan AF, Tijssen RJ. The neural net of neural network research. Scientometrics. 1993. 26:169–192.

24. Zavaglia M, Canolty RT, Schofield TM, Leff AP, Ursino M, Knight RT, Penny WD. A dynamical pattern recognition model of gamma activity in auditory cortex. Neural Netw. 2012. 28:1–14.

25. Coulter N, Monarch I, Konda S. Software engineering as seen through its research literature: a study in co-word analysis. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 1998. 49:1206–1223.

26. Coulter N, Monarch I, Suresh K, Marvin C. An evolutionary perspective of software engineering research through co-word analysis. 1996. Pittsburgh (PA): Carnegie-Mellon University Software Engineering Institute;Technical report no.: CMU/SEI-95-TR-019, ESCTR-95-019.

27. Rip A, Courtial JP. Co-word maps of biotechnology: an example of cognitive. Scientometrics. 1984. 6:381–400.

28. Albert A, Granadino B, Plaza LM. Scientific and technological performance evaluation of the Spanish Council for Scientific Research (CSIC) in the field of Biotechnology. Scientometrics. 2007. 70:41–51.

29. Zheng HC, Yan L, Cui L, Guan YF, Takano Y. Mapping the history and current situation of research on John Cunningham virus - a bibliometric analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2009. 9:28.

30. Kim SY. From MeSH indexed to retrieval. 2008. Seoul, Korea: Korean Medical Library Association.

31. Kwon AK, Chae YM. The study on subject words of Korean medical informatics by expanded MeSH: based on Journal of Korean Society of Medical Informatics. J Korean Soc Med Inform. 2002. 8:91–98.

32. Courtial JP. A coword analysis of scientometrics. Scientometrics. 1994. 31:251–260.

33. Lee WH, Kim YM, Park GR, Lee MH. A study on the emerging technology mapping through co-word analysis. Korean Manage Sci Rev. 2006. 23:77–93.

34. Kim P, Lee JY. Descriptor profiling for research domain analysis. J Korean Soc Inf Manage. 2007. 24:285–303.

35. Sohn DW. Social network analysis. 2010. 4th ed. Seoul, Korea: Kyungmun Publisher;1–21.

36. Mika P. Social networks and the semantic web. 2007. New York (NY): Springer;33–52.

37. Jung BS, Kwon YK. A study on the knowledge map of the computer engineering field by using a research paper database. Annu Proc Korea Inst Process Soc. 2011. 18:1460–1462.

38. Polanco X. Co-word analysis revisited: modelling co-word clusters in terms of graph theory. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics. 2005. 662–663.

39. Kim YH. Social network analysis. 2007. 2nd ed. Seoul, Korea: Pakyoungsa.

40. Hanneman RA, Riddle M. Introduction to social network methods. 2005. cited at 2012 Feb 6. Riverside (CA): University of California;Available from: http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/nettext/C10_Centrality.html.

41. Faust K. Comparing social networks: size, density, and local structure. Metodoloski zvezki. 2006. 3:185–216.

42. Borgatti SP. Centrality and network flow. Soc Networks. 2005. 27:55–71.

43. Freeman LC. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc Networks. 1979. 1:215–239.

44. Lee JY. Centrality measures for bibliometric network analysis. J Korean Soc Libr Inf Sci. 2006. 40:191–214.

45. Opsahla T, Agneessensb F, Skvoretzc J. Node centrality in weighted networks: generalizing degree and shortest paths. Soc Networks. 2010. 32:245–251.

46. Adamic LA, Lukose RM, Puniyani AR, Huberman BA. Search in power-law networks. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2001. 64:046135.

47. Yeo WD, Sohn ES, Jung ES, Lee CH. Identification of emerging research at the national level: scientometric approach using Scopus. J Inf Manag. 2008. 39:95–113.

48. Boyack KW, Klavans R. Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? J Am Soc Inf Sci Tech. 2010. 61:2389–2404.

49. Huh S. Medical databases from Korea and abroad. J Korean Med Assoc. 2010. 53:659–667.

50. Stegmann J, Grohmann G. Hypothesis generation guided by co-word clustering. Scientometrics. 2003. 56:111–135.

51. An XY, Wu QQ. Co-word analysis of the trends in stem cells field based on subject heading weighting. Scientometrics. 2011. 88:133–144.

52. Barrat A, Barthelemy M, Pastor-Satorras R, Vespignani A. The architecture of complex weighted networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004. 101:3747–3752.