Cancer Res Treat.  2008 Mar;40(1):16-21.

Prognostic Significance of Serum and Tissue Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Patients with Gastric Adenocarcinomas

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea. wyu@mail.knu.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Surgery, Daedong Hospital, Busan, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is known to be elevated in nearly all solid malignancies. The prognostic role of CEA in gastric cancers however, is still controversial. We evaluated preoperative serum CEA levels and CEA expression from the resected tumor tissues to determine whether they have prognostic significance in gastric cancer patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Medical records of 810 patients who underwent surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma from June, 1998 to February, 2002 in Kyungpook National University Hospital were reviewed. Serum CEA level was evaluated by radioimmunoassay preoperatively, and the cut-off level for positivity was 7.0 ng/ml. Labeled streptavidin-biotin peroxidase method was used to determine CEA expression from the gastric cancer tissues.
RESULTS
Serum and tissue CEA were positive in 9.3% and 91.1% of the patients, respectively. They had no correlation with each other. The positivity rate of serum CEA had positive correlation with invasion depth (p<0.001), lymph node metastasis (p<0.001), distant metastasis (p=0.006), and final stage (p<0.001). Well differentiated tumors showed higher serum CEA positivity (p=0.002). Patients with positive serum CEA had higher recurrence rate (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed significantly lower survival rate in patients with preoperative CEA levels over 7 ng/ml than those with lower levels (48.0% vs. 80.7%; p<0.001). The positivity rates of tissue CEA were higher in advanced cancers (p=0.033) and in more advanced stages (p=0.029). Tissue CEA positivity showed no correlation with recurrence or survival.
CONCLUSIONS
Preoperative serum CEA level had correlation with disease progression and survival in gastric cancer patients, and proved to be an independent prognostic factor. Tissue CEA expression in gastric cancers had no prognostic information.

Keyword

Carcinoembryonic antigen; Stomach Neoplasms; Preoperative serum level; Immunohistochemical stain; Prognostic factor

MeSH Terms

Adenocarcinoma
Carcinoembryonic Antigen
Disease Progression
Humans
Lymph Nodes
Medical Records
Multivariate Analysis
Neoplasm Metastasis
Peroxidase
Radioimmunoassay
Recurrence
Stomach Neoplasms
Survival Rate
Carcinoembryonic Antigen
Peroxidase

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Detection of the expression of carcinoembryonic antigenb (CEA) from the tumor tissue by immunohistochemistry (×100). The cytoplasm is strongly stained in comparison to nuclei or adjacent stroma.

  • Fig. 2 Survival curves of the patients according to the serum positivity of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA):broken line, negative CEA; solid line, positive CEA (p<0.001).


Reference

1. Abelev GI, Perova SD, Khramokora NI, Prostnikova ZA, Irin IS. Production of embryonal alpha-globulin by transplantable mouse hepatomas. Transplantation. 1963; 1:174–180. PMID: 14010646.
2. Thomson DM, Krupey J, Freedman SO, Gold P. The radioimmunoassay of circulating carcinoembryonic antigen of the human digestive system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1969; 64:161–167. PMID: 5262998.
Article
3. Yamao T, Kai S, Kazami A, Koizumi K, Handa T, Takemoto N, et al. Tumor markers CEA, CA19-9 and CA125 in monitoring of response to systemic chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1999; 29:550–555. PMID: 10678558.
Article
4. Kelsen DP. Fischer DS, editor. Gastric cancer. Follow-up of cancer, a handbook for physicians. 1996. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers;p. 36–37.
5. Hammarstrom S, Shively JE, Paxton RJ, Beatty BG, Larsson A, Ghosh R, et al. Antigenic sites in carcinoembryonic antigen. Cancer Res. 1989; 49:4852–4858. PMID: 2474375.
6. Schwartz MK. Current status of tumour markers. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl. 1995; 221:5–14. PMID: 7652491.
Article
7. Kodera Y, Yamamura Y, Torii A, Uesaka K, Hirai T, Yasui K, et al. The prognostic value of preoperative serum levels of CEA and CA19-9 in patients with gastric cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 1996; 91:49–53. PMID: 8561143.
8. Nakane Y, Okamura S, Akehira K, Boku T, Okusa T, Tanaka K, et al. Correlation of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels and prognosis of gastric cancer patients. Cancer. 1994; 73:2703–2708. PMID: 8194009.
Article
9. Nishida H. Immunohistochemical localization of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in gastric cancer--a comparative study between tissue CEA and plasma CEA. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1983; 84:328–335. PMID: 6371486.
10. Tachibana M, Takemoto Y, Nakashima Y, Kinugasa S, Kotoh T, Dhar DK, et al. Serum carcinoembryonic antigen as a prognostic factor in resectable gastric cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 1998; 187:64–68. PMID: 9660027.
Article
11. Hirai H. A collaborative clinical study of carcinoembryonic antigen in Japan. Cancer Res. 1977; 37:2267–2274. PMID: 67888.
12. Carcinoembryonic antigen: its role as a marker in the management of cancer. A national institutes of health consensus development conference. Ann Intern Med. 1981; 94:407–409. PMID: 7224393.
13. Martin EW Jr, Kibbey WE, Di Vecchia L, Anderson G, Catalano P, Minton JP. Carcinoembryonic antigen: clinical and histological aspects. Cancer. 1976; 37:62–81. PMID: 1247968.
14. Hansen HJ, Snyder JJ, Miller E, Vandevoorde JP, Miller ON, Hines LR, et al. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) assay. A laboratory adjunct in the diagnosis and management of cancer. Hum Pathol. 1974; 5:139–147. PMID: 4811605.
15. Alexander JC, Silverman NA, Chretien PB. Effect of age and cigarette smoking on carcinoembryonic antigen levels. JAMA. 1976; 235:1975–1979. PMID: 56468.
Article
16. Kojima O, Ikeda E, Uehara Y, Majima T, Fujita Y, Majima S. Correlation between carcinoembryonic antigen in gastric cancer tissue and survival of patients with gastric cancer. Gann. 1984; 75:230–236. PMID: 6373475.
17. Wittekind C, Wachner R, Henke W, von Kleist S. Localization of CEA, HCG, lysozyme, alpha-1-antitrypsin, and alpha-1-antichymotrypsin in gastric cancer and prognosis. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol. 1986; 409:715–724. PMID: 3092465.
Article
18. International Union against Cancer. Sobin LH, Wittekind Ch. TNM classification of malignant tumors. 1997. 5th ed. Heiderberg: Springer.
19. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma - 2nd English Edition. Gastric Cancer. 1998; 1:10–24. PMID: 11957040.
20. Tabuchi Y, Deguchi H, Saitoh Y. Carcinoembryonic antigen levels of portal blood in gastric cancer patients. J Surg Res. 1989; 47:81–86. PMID: 2739403.
Article
21. Kiyama T, Onda M, Tokunaga A, Nishi K, Mizutani T, Yoshiyuki T, et al. Changes in serum and tissue carcinoembryonic antigen with growth of a human gastric cancer xenograft in nude mice. Jpn J Cancer Res. 1990; 81:58–62. PMID: 2108947.
Article
22. Mori M, Ambe K, Adachi Y, Yakeishi Y, Nakamura K, Hachitanda Y, et al. Prognostic value of immunohistochemically identified CEA, SC, AFP, and S-100 protein-positive cells in gastric carcinoma. Cancer. 1988; 62:534–540. PMID: 2455589.
Article
23. Nakane Y, Okamura S, Akehira K, Boku T, Okusa T, Tanaka K, et al. Correlation of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels and prognosis of gastric cancer patients. Cancer. 1994; 73:2703–2708. PMID: 8194009.
Article
24. Sakamoto J, Nakazato H, Teramukai S, Ohashi Y, Takahashi Y, Mai M, et al. Association between preoperative plasma CEA levels and the prognosis of gastric cancer following curative resection. Surg Oncol. 1996; 5:133–139. PMID: 8908719.
Article
25. Ikeda Y, Oomori H, Koyanagi N, Mori M, Kamakura T, Minagawa S, et al. Prognostic value of combination assays for CEA and CA 19-9 in gastric cancer. Oncology. 1995; 52:483–486. PMID: 7478435.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CRT
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr