Ann Rehabil Med.  2014 Aug;38(4):450-457. 10.5535/arm.2014.38.4.450.

Effect of Dominant Hand Paralysis on Quality of Life in Patients With Subacute Stroke

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Kyungpook National University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea. teeed0522@hanmail.net
  • 2Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea.

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the degree to which the paralysis of a dominant hand affects quality of life (QOL) in patients with subacute stroke.
METHODS
We recruited 75 patients with subacute hemiplegic stroke. Patients were divided into two groups according to the location of the lesion and the side of the dominant hand. Group 1 consisted of patients whose strokes affected the dominant hand (i.e., right hemiplegia and right dominant hand or left hemiplegia and left dominant hand). Group 2 consisted of patients whose strokes affected the non-dominant hand (i.e., left hemiplegia and right dominant hand or right hemiplegia and left dominant hand). The primary outcome measure was the Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36), which was used to evaluate health-related QOL. Secondary outcomes were scores on the Modified Barthel Index (MBI) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI).
RESULTS
We did not find any statistically significant differences between the groups in any SF-36 domain including the summaries of physical and mental component. Similarly, the MBI and BDI scores were not significantly different between the groups.
CONCLUSION
The effect of paralysis on the dominant hand and QOL in patients with subacute stroke was not significantly different from the effect of paralysis on the non-dominant hand.

Keyword

Dominance; Quality of life; Stroke

MeSH Terms

Depression
Hand*
Health Surveys
Hemiplegia
Humans
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Paralysis*
Quality of Life*
Stroke*

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Flow chart of the patient selection process.

  • Fig. 2 Comparison of the physical and mental components of the SF-36 in the groups with paralysis of dominant hand (n=31, circle) and non-dominant hand (n=44, square) revealed no significant differences between the groups. PF, physical function; RP, role physical; BP, bodily pain; GH, general health; PCS, physical component summary; VT, vitality; SF, social function; RE, role emotional; MH, mental health; MCS, mental component summary.


Cited by  1 articles

Comparison of Functions, Activity of Daily Living, and Quality of Life according to Hand Dominance in Stroke
Minsu Park, Eun Joo Kim, Junhee Han, Myung Hoon Moon, Yun-Hee Kim, Sung-Hwa Ko, Yong-Il Shin
Brain Neurorehabil. 2015;8(2):96-103.    doi: 10.12786/bn.2015.8.2.96.


Reference

1. Han B, Haley WE. Family caregiving for patients with stroke: review and analysis. Stroke. 1999; 30:1478–1485. PMID: 10390326.
2. Jonsson AC, Lindgren I, Hallstrom B, Norrving B, Lindgren A. Determinants of quality of life in stroke survivors and their informal caregivers. Stroke. 2005; 36:803–808. PMID: 15761203.
Article
3. Black-Schaffer RM, Osberg JS. Return to work after stroke: development of a predictive model. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990; 71:285–290. PMID: 2327878.
4. Pyun SB, Kim SH, Hahn MS, Kwon HK, Lee HJ. Quality of life after stroke. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med. 1999; 23:233–239.
5. Triggs WJ, Calvanio R, Levine M, Heaton RK, Heilman KM. Predicting hand preference with performance on motor tasks. Cortex. 2000; 36:679–689. PMID: 11195914.
Article
6. Provins KA. The specificity of motor skill and manual asymmetry: a review of the evidence and its implications. J Mot Behav. 1997; 29:183–192. PMID: 12453794.
Article
7. Harris JE, Eng JJ. Individuals with the dominant hand affected following stroke demonstrate less impairment than those with the nondominant hand affected. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006; 20:380–389. PMID: 16885424.
Article
8. Annett M. Five tests of hand skill. Cortex. 1992; 28:583–600. PMID: 1478086.
Article
9. Bestelmeyer PE, Carey DP. Processing biases towards the preferred hand: valid and invalid cueing of left- versus right-hand movements. Neuropsychologia. 2004; 42:1162–1167. PMID: 15178168.
Article
10. Kauranen K, Vanharanta H. Influences of aging, gender, and handedness on motor performance of upper and lower extremities. Percept Mot Skills. 1996; 82:515–525. PMID: 8724924.
Article
11. Gowland C, deBruin H, Basmajian JV, Plews N, Burcea I. Agonist and antagonist activity during voluntary upper-limb movement in patients with stroke. Phys Ther. 1992; 72:624–633. PMID: 1508970.
Article
12. Spaulding SJ, McPherson JJ, Strachota E, Kuphal M, Ramponi M. Jebsen Hand Function Test: performance of the uninvolved hand in hemiplegia and of right-handed, right and left hemiplegic persons. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988; 69:419–422. PMID: 3377667.
13. Laufer Y, Gattenio L, Parnas E, Sinai D, Sorek Y, Dickstein R. Time-related changes in motor performance of the upper extremity ipsilateral to the side of the lesion in stroke survivors. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2001; 15:167–172. PMID: 11944737.
Article
14. De Haan RJ, Limburg M, Van der Meulen JH, Jacobs HM, Aaronson NK. Quality of life after stroke: impact of stroke type and lesion location. Stroke. 1995; 26:402–408. PMID: 7886714.
15. McMeekan ER, Lishman WA. Retest reliabilities and interrelationship of the Annett hand preference questionnaire and the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory. Br J Psychol. 1975; 66:53–59.
Article
16. Han CW, Lee EJ, Iwaya T, Kataoka H, Kohzuki M. Development of the Korean version of Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey: health related QOL of healthy elderly people and elderly patients in Korea. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2004; 203:189–194. PMID: 15240928.
Article
17. Ware JE Jr. SF-36 health survey update. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25:3130–3139. PMID: 11124729.
Article
18. Goulding MR, Rogers ME, Smith SM. Public health and aging: trends in aging: United States and worldwide. JAMA. 2003; 289:1371–1373. PMID: 12636453.
19. Jung HY, Park BK, Shin HS, Kang YK, Pyun SB, Paik NJ, et al. Development of the Korean version of Modified Barthel Index (K-MBI): multi-center study for subjects with stroke. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med. 2007; 31:283–297.
20. Kim WH, Hahn SJ, Im HJ, Yang KS. Reliability and validity of the Korean World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL)-BREF in people with physical impairments. Ann Rehabil Med. 2013; 37:488–497. PMID: 24020029.
Article
21. Jang SH, Rah UW, Kim YC, Park YS, Jo D, Kim YC, et al. Development of Korean Academy of Medical Sciences guideline-rating the impairment in pain. J Korean Med Sci. 2009; 24(Suppl 2):S330–S337. PMID: 19503691.
Article
22. Kim HJ, Park EH. Diagnostic efficiency of BDI in a clinical setting: comparison among depression, anxiety, psychosis and control group. Int J Innov Managd Technol. 2010; 1:502–506.
23. Hahn HM, Yum TH, Shin YW, Kim KH, Yoon DJ, Chung KJ. A standardization study of Beck Depression Inventory in Korea. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 1986; 25:487–500.
24. Beck AT. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: twenty-five years of evaluation. Clin Psychol Rev. 1988; 8:77–100.
Article
25. Perry S, Kowalski TL, Chang CH. Quality of life assessment in women with breast cancer: benefits, acceptability and utilization. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007; 5:24. PMID: 17474993.
Article
26. Donaldson MS. Taking stock of health-related quality-of-life measurement in oncology practice in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2004; (33):155–167. PMID: 15504926.
Article
27. Wang HM, Beyer M, Gensichen J, Gerlach FM. Healthrelated quality of life among general practice patients with differing chronic diseases in Germany: cross sectional survey. BMC Public Health. 2008; 8:246. PMID: 18638419.
Article
28. Coons SJ, Rao S, Keininger DL, Hays RD. A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments. Pharmacoeconomics. 2000; 17:13–35. PMID: 10747763.
Article
29. King RB. Quality of life after stroke. Stroke. 1996; 27:1467–1472. PMID: 8784114.
Article
30. Doan QV, Brashear A, Gillard PJ, Varon SF, Vandenburgh AM, Turkel CC, et al. Relationship between disability and health-related quality of life and caregiver burden in patients with upper limb poststroke spasticity. PM R. 2012; 4:4–10. PMID: 22200567.
Article
31. Han TR, Yoon KJ, Jung SH. The chronological review of uninvolved hand function in stroke patients. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med. 2004; 28:13–19.
32. Hadidi N, Treat-Jacobson DJ, Lindquist R. Poststroke depression and functional outcome: a critical review of literature. Heart Lung. 2009; 38:151–162. PMID: 19254633.
Article
33. Robinson RG, Spalletta G. Poststroke depression: a review. Can J Psychiatry. 2010; 55:341–349. PMID: 20540828.
Article
34. Nelson LD, Cicchetti D, Satz P, Sowa M, Mitrushina M. Emotional sequelae of stroke: a longitudinal perspective. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1994; 16:796–806. PMID: 7836503.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ARM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr