Clin Endosc.  2013 Sep;46(5):480-485.

Deep Enteroscopy: Which Technique Will Survive?

• Jeon SR
• Kim JO

Abstract

The advent of deep enteroscopy (DE) has dramatically changed diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to small bowel diseases. Unlike capsule endoscopy, which is unable to obtain biopsies or treat a disease, DE techniques have diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities. Double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) was introduced in 2001, and single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE) and spiral enteroscopy (SE) were subsequently developed for small bowel investigation. In published reports comparing these different enteroscopy techniques, most comparative parameters (depth of insertion, complications, learning curve, diagnostic yield, and therapeutic yield) were comparable among DBE, SBE, and SE. However, the procedure duration appears to be shorter for SE than for DBE and SBE. The rate of complete enteroscopy is clearly superior for DBE, compared with SE and SBE. Because these results do not indicate an increase in diagnostic or therapeutic yield, the clinical impact of complete enteroscopy remains controversial. According to previous studies, the three DE methods seem to be equally effective and safe in the clinical setting. Although larger randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate the procedural characteristics and clinical impact, the selection of an enteroscopic technique should be based on availability and the endoscopist's experience.

Keyword

Double-balloon enteroscopy; Single-balloon enteroscopy; Spiral enteroscopy

MeSH Terms

Biopsy
Capsule Endoscopy
Double-Balloon Enteroscopy
Learning Curve

Reference

1. Yamamoto H, Sekine Y, Sato Y, et al. Total enteroscopy with a nonsurgical steerable double-balloon method. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001; 53:216–220. PMID: 11174299.

2. Elena RM, Riccardo U, Rossella C, Bizzotto A, Domenico G, Guido C. Current status of device-assisted enteroscopy: technical matters, indication, limits and complications. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 4:453–461. PMID: 23189216.

3. Rahmi G, Samaha E, Vahedi K, et al. Multicenter comparison of double-balloon enteroscopy and spiral enteroscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013; 28:992–998. PMID: 23488827.

4. Monkemüller K, Fry LC, Bellutti M, Malfertheiner P. Balloon-assisted enteroscopy: unifying double-balloon and single-balloon enteroscopy. Endoscopy. 2008; 40:537. PMID: 18543140.

5. May A, Ell C. Push-and-pull enteroscopy using the double-balloon technique/double-balloon enteroscopy. Dig Liver Dis. 2006; 38:932–938. PMID: 16978935.

6. Lenz P, Domagk D. Double- vs. single-balloon vs. spiral enteroscopy. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2012; 26:303–313. PMID: 22704572.

7. Messer I, May A, Manner H, Ell C. Prospective, randomized, single-center trial comparing double-balloon enteroscopy and spiral enteroscopy in patients with suspected small-bowel disorders. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013; 77:241–249. PMID: 23043851.

8. Xin L, Liao Z, Jiang YP, Li ZS. Indications, detectability, positive findings, total enteroscopy, and complications of diagnostic double-balloon endoscopy: a systematic review of data over the first decade of use. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 74:563–570. PMID: 21620401.

9. Jeon SR, Kim JO, Kim HG, et al. Changes over time in indications, diagnostic yield, and clinical effects of double-balloon enteroscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012; 10:1152–1156. PMID: 22801056.

10. Domagk D, Mensink P, Aktas H, et al. Single- vs. double-balloon enteroscopy in small-bowel diagnostics: a randomized multicenter trial. Endoscopy. 2011; 43:472–476. PMID: 21384320.

11. May A, Farber M, Aschmoneit I, et al. Prospective multicenter trial comparing push-and-pull enteroscopy with the single- and double-balloon techniques in patients with small-bowel disorders. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010; 105:575–581. PMID: 20051942.

12. Takano N, Yamada A, Watabe H, et al. Single-balloon versus double-balloon endoscopy for achieving total enteroscopy: a randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 73:734–739. PMID: 21272875.

13. May A, Manner H, Aschmoneit I, Ell C. Prospective, cross-over, single-center trial comparing oral double-balloon enteroscopy and oral spiral enteroscopy in patients with suspected small-bowel vascular malformations. Endoscopy. 2011; 43:477–483. PMID: 21437852.

14. Efthymiou M, Desmond PV, Brown G, et al. SINGLE-01: a randomized, controlled trial comparing the efficacy and depth of insertion of single- and double-balloon enteroscopy by using a novel method to determine insertion depth. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 76:972–980. PMID: 22980289.

15. May A, Nachbar L, Schneider M, Neumann M, Ell C. Push-and-pull enteroscopy using the double-balloon technique: method of assessing depth of insertion and training of the enteroscopy technique using the Erlangen Endo-Trainer. Endoscopy. 2005; 37:66–70. PMID: 15657861.

16. Khashab MA, Lennon AM, Dunbar KB, et al. A comparative evaluation of single-balloon enteroscopy and spiral enteroscopy for patients with mid-gut disorders. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 72:766–772. PMID: 20619404.

17. May A, Nachbar L, Ell C. Double-balloon enteroscopy (push-and-pull enteroscopy) of the small bowel: feasibility and diagnostic and therapeutic yield in patients with suspected small bowel disease. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005; 62:62–70. PMID: 15990821.

18. Yamamoto H, Kita H, Sunada K, et al. Clinical outcomes of double-balloon endoscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of small-intestinal diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004; 2:1010–1016. PMID: 15551254.

19. May A. How much importance do we have to place on complete enteroscopy? Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 73:740–742. PMID: 21457816.

20. Xin L, Gao Y, Liao Z, Li ZS. The reasonable calculation of complete enteroscopy rate for balloon-assisted enteroscopy. Endoscopy. 2011; 43:832. PMID: 21894584.

21. Gerson LB. Small-bowel enteroscopy. Endoscopy. 2013; 45:292–295. PMID: 23440585.

22. Mehdizadeh S, Ross A, Gerson L, et al. What is the learning curve associated with double-balloon enteroscopy? Technical details and early experience in 6 U.S. tertiary care centers. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006; 64:740–750. PMID: 17055868.

23. Dutta AK, Sajith KG, Joseph AJ, Simon EG, Chacko A. Learning curve, diagnostic yield and safety of single balloon enteroscopy. Trop Gastroenterol. 2012; 33:179–184. PMID: 23600047.

24. Buscaglia JM, Dunbar KB, Okolo PI 3rd, et al. The spiral enteroscopy training initiative: results of a prospective study evaluating the Discovery SB overtube device during small bowel enteroscopy (with video). Endoscopy. 2009; 41:194–199. PMID: 19280530.

25. Frieling T, Heise J, Sassenrath W, Hulsdonk A, Kreysel C. Prospective comparison between double-balloon enteroscopy and spiral enteroscopy. Endoscopy. 2010; 42:885–888. PMID: 20803420.

26. Moreels TG. Device-assisted enteroscopy: how deep is deep enteroscopy? Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 76:981–982. PMID: 23078922.

27. Shah RJ, Smolkin M, Yen R, et al. A multicenter, U.S. experience of single-balloon, double-balloon, and rotational overtube-assisted enteroscopy ERCP in patients with surgically altered pancreaticobiliary anatomy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2013; 77:593–600. PMID: 23290720.

28. Kiesslich R KS, Hoffman A, Goetz M, Galle PR, Neurath MF. Small bowel enteroscopy: feasibility and safety of the new balloon guided endoscopy system using different high definition, confocal and standard endoscopes. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 69:AB364.

29. Adler SN, Bjarnason I, Metzger YC. New balloon-guided technique for deep small-intestine endoscopy using standard endoscopes. Endoscopy. 2008; 40:502–505. PMID: 18556805.