1. Soetikno R, Kaltenbach T, Yeh R, Gotoda T. Endoscopic mucosal resection for early cancers of the upper gastrointestinal tract. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23:4490–4498.
Article
2. Ono H, Kondo H, Gotoda T, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection for treatment of early gastric cancer. Gut. 2001; 48:225–229.
Article
3. Isomoto H, Shikuwa S, Yamaguchi N, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a large-scale feasibility study. Gut. 2009; 58:331–336.
Article
4. Park YM, Cho E, Kang HY, Kim JM. The effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Surg Endosc. 2011; 25:2666–2677.
Article
5. Takahashi F, Yoshitake N, Akima T, et al. A second-look endoscopy may not reduce the bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasm. BMC Gastroenterol. 2014; 14:152.
Article
6. Higashiyama M, Oka S, Tanaka S, et al. Risk factors for bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric epithelial neoplasm. Dig Endosc. 2011; 23:290–295.
Article
7. Takizawa K, Oda I, Gotoda T, et al. Routine coagulation of visible vessels may prevent delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection: an analysis of risk factors. Endoscopy. 2008; 40:179–183.
8. Forrest JA, Finlayson ND, Shearman DJ. Endoscopy in gastrointestinal bleeding. Lancet. 1974; 2:394–397.
Article
9. Guglielmi A, Ruzzenente A, Sandri M, et al. Risk assessment and prediction of rebleeding in bleeding gastroduodenal ulcer. Endoscopy. 2002; 34:778–786.
Article
10. Lin HJ, Lee FY, Kang WM, Tsai YT, Lee SD, Lee CH. A controlled study of therapeutic endoscopy for peptic ulcer with non-bleeding visible vessel. Gastrointest Endosc. 1990; 36:241–246.
Article
11. Lu Y, Chen YI, Barkun A. Endoscopic management of acute peptic ulcer bleeding. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2014; 43:677–705.
Article
12. El Ouali S, Barkun AN, Wyse J, et al. Is routine second-look endoscopy effective after endoscopic hemostasis in acute peptic ulcer bleeding? A meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 76:283–292.
13. Kim SB, Lee SH, Kim KO, et al. Risk factors associated with rebleeding in patients with high risk peptic ulcer bleeding: focusing on the role of second look endoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 2016; 61:517–522.
14. Kim HH, Park SJ, Park MI, Moon W. Clinical impact of second-look endoscopy after endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric neoplasms. Gut Liver. 2012; 6:316–320.
Article
15. Kim JS, Chung MW, Chung CY, et al. The need for second-look endoscopy to prevent delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasms: a prospective randomized trial. Gut Liver. 2014; 8:480–486.
Article
16. Ryu HY, Kim JW, Kim HS, et al. Second-look endoscopy is not associated with better clinical outcomes after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: a prospective, randomized, clinical trial analyzed on an as-treated basis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013; 78:285–294.
Article
17. Na S, Ahn JY, Choi KD, et al. Delayed bleeding rate according to the Forrest classification in second-look endoscopy after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Dig Dis Sci. 2015; 60:3108–3117.
Article
18. Goto O, Fujishiro M, Kodashima S, et al. A second-look endoscopy after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasm may be unnecessary: a retrospective analysis of postendoscopic submucosal dissection bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 71:241–248.
Article
19. Goto O, Fujishiro M, Kodashima S, et al. Short-term healing process of artificial ulcers after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gut Liver. 2011; 5:293–297.
Article
20. Kim DS, Jung Y, Rhee HS, et al. Usefulness of the Forrest classification to predict artificial ulcer rebleeding during second-look endoscopy after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Clin Endosc. 2016; 49:273–281.
Article