Investig Magn Reson Imaging.  2016 Mar;20(1):1-8. 10.13104/imri.2016.20.1.1.

Interpretation of MR Imaging of Spinal Metastasis: Focus on the Understanding of Its Pathophysiology and the Next Step toward a Further Clinical Approach Using MRI Findings

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Radiology, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju, Korea. we1977@naver.com

Abstract

The spine is the most common location for skeletal metastases, and the incidence of spinal metastasis shows an increasing tendency. Because metastatic spinal tumors progress from an anterior element to a posterior element resulting in continuing destruction of the pedicles, epidural extension and involvement of neural structures of the metastatic tumor are eventually visible. Therefore, it is clinically significant for radiologists to understand the pathophysiology of spinal metastasis and to assess the involvement of neural structures and the disintegration of spinal instability related to the pathophysiology. As MRI is also the best imaging modality for diagnosing spinal metastasis, radiologists should accurately assess spinal metastasis and provide practical information to physicians. Therefore, we will describe some analysis points focusing on the understanding of pathophysiology of spinal metastasis and the next step toward a more extensive clinical approach using MR imaging.

Keyword

Spine; Metastasis; Magnetic resonance imaging

MeSH Terms

Incidence
Magnetic Resonance Imaging*
Neoplasm Metastasis*
Spine

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Tumor in the vertebral body: The tumor is anterior to the spinal cord and grows posteriorly to compress the spinal cord (6). Reprinted with permission from (6): Cole JS, Patchell RA. Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression. Lancet Neurol 2008;7:459-466.

  • Fig. 2 Schematic diagram of the surgical classification of spinal tumors, from Choi et al. (1). Reprinted with permission from: Choi D, Crockard A, Bunger C, et al. Review of metastatic spine tumour classification and indications for surgery: the consensus statement of the Global Spine Tumour Study Group. Eur Spine J 2010;19:215-222.

  • Fig. 3 Intracompartmental bone metastasis: 68-year-old woman consulting for breast cancer. Sagittal gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted (TR/TE; 550/7) image with fat saturation (a) and axial gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted (TR/TE; 455/10) image with fat saturation (b) show C7 metastasis contained within vertebral body.

  • Fig. 4 Extracompartmental bone metastasis: 58-year-old man consulting for hepatocellular carcinoma. Sagittal gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted (TR/TE; 711/11) image with fat saturation (a), axial T2-weighted (TR/TE; 5063/89) image (b) and axial gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted (TR/TE; 741/11) image with fat saturation (c) show T7 metastasis out of the bones of T7 extending to epidural and a paravertebral space.

  • Fig. 5 Metastases in multiple vertebral levels: 42-year-old woman visiting for sigmoid colon cancer and both inguinal pain. Sagittal T1-weighted (TR/TE; 496/10) image (a), sagittal T2-weighted (TR/TE; 3832/100) image (b) and sagittal gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted (TR/TE; 460/10) image with fat saturation (c) show multiple vertebral involvement of bone metastasis in L1-L5 and bodies of S1 and S2.

  • Fig. 6 Neural compression: 59-year-old man with esophageal cancer visited for weakness of both lower extremities. Sagittal T1-weighted (TR/TE; 661/10) image (a), sagittal T2-weighted (TR/TE; 2347/120) image (b), sagittal gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted (TR/TE; 557/8) image with fat saturation (c), axial gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted (TR/TE; 483/10) image with fat saturation (d), axial T2-weighted (TR/TE; 3262/115) image (e) show bone metastasis in T1 and T2 associated with pathologic compression fracture and epidural extension (empty arrows) of the metastatic tumor resulting in compromise of spinal canal and compression of spinal cord. And sagittal and axial T2-weighted images also show high signal change in spinal cord of C7-T4 level suggesting compressive myelopathy (arrows).

  • Fig. 7 Spinal instability: 51-year-old woman with breast cancer visiting for detection of metastasis in T7, but she did not complain of severe pain. Sagittal T2-weighted (TR/TE; 3500/100) image (a) shows bone metastasis and pathologic compression fracture without spinal cord compression. She treated by palliative radiation therapy for T7. However, two years later, in follow-up study, sagittal T2-weighted (TR/TE; 3500/120) image (b) shows more decreased height of T7 and compression of spinal cord in T7 level.

  • Fig. 8 Special cases: Leptomeingeal metastasis: 43-year-old woman with breast cancer complained of weakness and pain in both lower extremities. Sagittal T1-weighted (TR/TE; 661/10) image of C-T spine (a), sagittal T2-weighted (TR/TE; 2239/120) image of C-T spine (b) and sagittal gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted (TR/TE; 448/10) image with fat saturation image of L-spine (c) show multiple bone metastases in the whole spine, and thick enhancement of leptomeninges from L5 to S2 suggesting leptomeningeal metastasis (arrows). Leptomeningeal metastasis is proven by CSF study.


Reference

1. Choi D, Crockard A, Bunger C, et al. Review of metastatic spine tumour classification and indications for surgery: the consensus statement of the Global Spine Tumour Study Group. Eur Spine J. 2010; 19:215–222.
2. Harel R, Angelov L. Spine metastases: current treatments and future directions. Eur J Cancer. 2010; 46:2696–2707.
3. Sciubba DM, Gokaslan ZL. Diagnosis and management of metastatic spine disease. Surg Oncol. 2006; 15:141–151.
4. Ecker RD, Endo T, Wetjen NM, Krauss WE. Diagnosis and treatment of vertebral column metastases. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005; 80:1177–1186.
5. Mut M, Schiff D, Shaffrey ME. Metastasis to nervous system: spinal epidural and intramedullary metastases. J Neurooncol. 2005; 75:43–56.
6. Cole JS, Patchell RA. Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression. Lancet Neurol. 2008; 7:459–466.
7. Dunning EC, Butler JS, Morris S. Complications in the management of metastatic spinal disease. World J Orthop. 2012; 3:114–121.
8. Schick U, Marquardt G, Lorenz R. Intradural and extradural spinal metastases. Neurosurg Rev. 2001; 24:1–5. discussion 6-7
9. Tomita K, Kawahara N, Kobayashi T, Yoshida A, Murakami H, Akamaru T. Surgical strategy for spinal metastases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001; 26:298–306.
10. Galasko CS, Norris HE, Crank S. Spinal instability secondary to metastatic cancer. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000; 82:570–594.
11. Helweg-Larsen S, Sorensen PS. Symptoms and signs in metastatic spinal cord compression: a study of progression from first symptom until diagnosis in 153 patients. Eur J Cancer. 1994; 30A:396–398.
12. Fisher CG, DiPaola CP, Ryken TC, et al. A novel classification system for spinal instability in neoplastic disease: an evidence-based approach and expert consensus from the Spine Oncology Study Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010; 35:E1221–E1229.
13. Crim JR, Bassett LW, Gold RH, et al. Spinal neuroarthropathy after traumatic paraplegia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1988; 9:359–362.
14. Laufer I, Rubin DG, Lis E, et al. The NOMS framework: approach to the treatment of spinal metastatic tumors. Oncologist. 2013; 18:744–751.
15. Lee CS, Jung CH. Metastatic spinal tumor. Asian Spine J. 2012; 6:71–87.
16. Fisher CG, Versteeg AL, Schouten R, et al. Reliability of the spinal instability neoplastic scale among radiologists: an assessment of instability secondary to spinal metastases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014; 203:869–874.
17. Chamberlain MC. Neoplastic meningitis. Neurologist. 2006; 12:179–187.
18. Shapiro WR, Johanson CE, Boogerd W. Treatment modalities for leptomeningeal metastases. Semin Oncol. 2009; 36:S46–S54.
19. Mostardi PM, Diehn FE, Rykken JB, et al. Intramedullary spinal cord metastases: visibility on PET and correlation with MRI features. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014; 35:196–201.
20. Lee SS, Kim MK, Sym SJ, et al. Intramedullary spinal cord metastases: a single-institution experience. J Neurooncol. 2007; 84:85–89.
21. Eastley N, Newey M, Ashford RU. Skeletal metastases - the role of the orthopaedic and spinal surgeon. Surg Oncol. 2012; 21:216–222.
22. Love RR, Leventhal H, Easterling DV, Nerenz DR. Side effects and emotional distress during cancer chemotherapy. Cancer. 1989; 63:604–612.
23. Cho JH, Ha JK, Hwang CJ, Lee DH, Lee CS. Patterns of treatment for metastatic pathological fractures of the spine: the efficacy of each treatment modality. Clin Orthop Surg. 2015; 7:476–482.
Full Text Links
  • IMRI
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr