Yeungnam Univ J Med.  1998 Jun;15(1):125-134. 10.12701/yujm.1998.15.1.125.

Comparison of Usefulness of Laboratory Tests in Diagnosis of Myasthenia Gravis

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, Yeung-Nam University Taegu, Korea.
  • 2AnDong Presbyterian Hospital AnDong, Korea.
  • 3SangJu Red Cross Hospital SangJu, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to evaluate the clinical usefulness of Tensilon test, repetitive nerve stimulation test(RNST), single fiber EMG(SFEMG) test and acetylcholine receptor antibody(AchR Ab) assay for making diagnosis of myasthenia gravis(MG). METHOD: These tests were performed in 21 MG patients which were classified into 11 ocular, 5 mild generalized, 4 moderate generalized, and 1 chronic severe MG. RESULT: The overall positivity of Tensilon test, SFEMG and AchR Ab was 95%, 87%, and 76% respectively. The overall positivity of RNST was 67%; 38% on flexor carpi ulnaris, 43% on adductor digiti quinti and 62% on orbicularis oculi muscles. The positivity of each test was higher in generalized MG group than in ocular MG group. But we could observe the statistically significant difference only in the RNST(p<0.05).
CONCLUSION
Tensilon test showed the highest positivity in all MG groups. So we would like to recommend the Tensilon test for the diagnosis of MG at first, followed by RNST and AchR Ab assay, and SFEMG would be indicated to MG group which showed relatively low postivity in other tests.

Keyword

Tensilon test; RNST; SFEMG; AchR Ab; Myasthenia Gravis

MeSH Terms

Acetylcholine
Diagnosis*
Edrophonium
Humans
Muscles
Myasthenia Gravis*
Acetylcholine
Edrophonium
Full Text Links
  • YUJM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr