J Korean Surg Soc.
2000 Sep;59(3):377-382.
Comparative Study of Anatomic and Physiologic Measurement of the Anal Sphincter in Adult Women
- Affiliations
-
- 1Department of General Surgery, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University.
Abstract
-
PURPOSE: This study has carried out to clarify the relationship between changes in the anal sphincter
muscle thickness and pressure. Also, this study shows the effect of vaginal delivery and benign anal
disease on the function and structure of the anal sphincter. METHODS: Women (n=42; mean age: 33.2 +/- 9.6
years old) without defecation problems or history of anal surgery, who came to Ewha Womans University
Hospital between July 1999 and October 1999, were chosen. We measured the resting and the squeezing
pressure with anal manometry and the thickness of the internal anal sphincter (IAS) and external anal
sphincter (EAS) by endoanal sonography. RESULTS: The mean squeezing and resting pressures were 98.3 +/- 38.2 and 53.9 +/-17.4 cmH2O, and the mean EAS and IAS thicknesses were 4.9+/-0.9 and 1.9+/-0.3 mm,
respectively. The thickness of the EAS and squeezing pressure did not correlate. Neither did the IAS
thickness and the resting pressure. In cases with a history of vaginal delivery (n=15), the squeezing and
the resting pressures were 94.0+/-43.0 and 57.1+/-22.2 cmH2O, and the thicknesses of the EAS and the
IAS, 4.6+/-0.9 and 2.0+/-0.4 mm, respectively. The number of deliveries had no correlation with the
thickness or the pressure of the anal sphincter. In patients with benign anal lesions (n=11), the squeezing
and the resting pressure was 113.0+/-42.9 and 57.0+/-14.0 cmH2O, and the thicknesses of the EAS
and the IAS were 5.0+/-1.3 and 2.1+/-0.4 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that
the function and the structure of the anal sphincter are independent. In adult women, the
thickness of the anal sphincter, the history of vaginal delivery, and the existence of benign
anal lesions had no effect on anal sphincter function.