1. Hilberg O, Jackson AC, Swift DL, Pedersen OF. Acoustic rhinometry: evaluation of nasal cavity geometry by acoustic reflection. J Appl Physiol. 1989; 1. 66(1):295–303. PMID:
2917933.
Article
2. Corey JP. Acoustic rhinometry: should we be using it? Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006; 2. 14(1):29–34. PMID:
16467635.
Article
3. Andre RF, Vuyk HD, Ahmed A, Graamans K, Nolst Trenite GJ. Correlation between subjective and objective evaluation of the nasal airway: a systematic review of the highest level of evidence. Clin Otolaryngol. 2009; 12. 34(6):518–525. PMID:
20070760.
4. Cakmak O, Tarhan E, Coskun M, Cankurtaran M, Celik H. Acoustic rhinometry: accuracy and ability to detect changes in passage area at different locations in the nasal cavity. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2005; 12. 114(12):949–957. PMID:
16425563.
Article
5. Cankurtaran M, Celik H, Coskun M, Hizal E, Cakmak O. Acoustic rhinometry in healthy humans: accuracy of area estimates and ability to quantify certain anatomic structures in the nasal cavity. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2007; 12. 116(12):906–916. PMID:
18217510.
Article
6. Cheung EJ, Citardi MJ, Fakhri S, Cain J, Batra PS, Luong A. Comparison of optical rhinometry to acoustic rhinometry using nasal provocation testing with Dermatophagoides farinae. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010; 8. 143(2):290–293. PMID:
20647137.
Article
7. Corey JP, Gungor A, Nelson R, Fredberg J, Lai V. A comparison of the nasal cross-sectional areas and volumes obtained with acoustic rhinometry and magnetic resonance imaging. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997; 10. 117(4):349–354. PMID:
9339795.
Article
8. Hopkins C. Re: Correlation between subjective and objective evaluation of the nasal airway. Clin Otolaryngol. 2010; 4. 35(2):147–148. PMID:
20500587.
Article
9. Munoz-Cano R, Salvador R, Valero A, Berenguer J, Alobid I, Bartra J, et al. Accuracy of acoustic rhinometry versus computed tomography in the evaluation of nasal cavity in patients with nasal polyposis. Rhinology. 2010; 6. 48(2):224–227. PMID:
20502765.
Article
10. Ouriques DM, Carlini D, Fujita R, Pignatari SS, Weckx LL. Correlation between fiberoptic nasal endoscopy and acoustic rhinometry in adults without nasal complaints. Am J Rhinol. 2006; Jul-Aug. 20(4):375–378. PMID:
16955763.
Article
11. Terheyden H, Maune S, Mertens J, Hilberg O. Acoustic rhinometry: validation by three-dimensionally reconstructed computer tomographic scans. J Appl Physiol. 2000; 9. 89(3):1013–1021. PMID:
10956345.
Article
12. Gilain L, Coste A, Ricolfi F, Dahan E, Marliac D, Peynegre R, et al. Nasal cavity geometry measured by acoustic rhinometry and computed tomography. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997; 4. 123(4):401–405. PMID:
9109788.
Article
13. Tarhan E, Coskun M, Cakmak O, Celik H, Cankurtaran M. Acoustic rhinometry in humans: accuracy of nasal passage area estimates, and ability to quantify paranasal sinus volume and ostium size. J Appl Physiol. 2005; 8. 99(2):616–623. PMID:
15802371.
Article
14. Numminen J, Ahtinen M 3rd, Huhtala H, Laranne J, Rautiainen M. Correlation between rhinometric measurement methods in healthy young adults. Am J Rhinol. 2002; Jul-Aug. 16(4):203–208. PMID:
12222945.
Article
15. Castano R, Theriault G, Gautrin D, Ghezzo H, Trudeau C, Malo JL. Reproducibility of acoustic rhinometry in the investigation of occupational rhinitis. Am J Rhinol. 2007; Jul-Aug. 21(4):474–477. PMID:
17882918.
Article
16. Harar RP, Kalan A, Kenyon GS. Improving the reproducibility of acoustic rhinometry in the assessment of nasal function. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2002; Jan-Feb. 64(1):22–25. PMID:
11891393.
Article
17. Ognibene NE, Merrick MA, Ingersoll CD. Intra- and intersession reliability of acoustic rhinometry in measuring nasal cross-sectional area. Ear Nose Throat J. 2001; 8. 80(8):536539–540. PMID:
11523471.
Article
18. Silkoff PE, Chakravorty S, Chapnik J, Cole P, Zamel N. Reproducibility of acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry in normal subjects. Am J Rhinol. 1999; Mar-Apr. 13(2):131–135. PMID:
10219442.
Article
19. Roithmann R, Cole P, Chapnik J, Zamel N. Beproducibility of acoustic rhinometric measurements. Am J Rhinol. 1995; Sep-Oct. 9(5):263–267.
20. Kesavanathan J, Swift DL, Fitzgerald TK, Permutt T, Bascom R. Evaluation of acoustic rhinometry and posterior rhinomanometry as tools for inhalation challenge studies. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1996; 6. 48(3):295–307. PMID:
8656451.
Article
21. Hilberg O, Pedersen OF. Acoustic rhinometry: recommendations for technical specifications and standard operating procedures. Rhinol Suppl. 2000; 12. 16:3–17. PMID:
11225287.
22. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977; 3. 33(1):159–174. PMID:
843571.
Article
23. Nurminen M, Hytonen M, Sala E. Modelling the reproducibility of acoustic rhinometry. Stat Med. 2000; 5. 19(9):1179–1189. PMID:
10797515.
Article