Imaging Sci Dent.  2015 Dec;45(4):233-240. 10.5624/isd.2015.45.4.233.

Assessment of maxillary third molars with panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography

• Jung YH
• Cho BH

• KMID: 2132936
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2015.45.4.233

Abstract

PURPOSE
This study investigated maxillary third molars and their relation to the maxillary sinus using panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A total of 395 maxillary third molars in 234 patients were examined using panoramic radiographs and CBCT images. We examined the eruption level of the maxillary third molars, the available retromolar space, the angulation, the relationship to the second molars, the number of roots, and the relationship between the roots and the sinus.
RESULTS
Females had a higher frequency of maxillary third molars with occlusal planes apical to the cervical line of the second molar (Level C) than males. All third molars with insufficient retromolar space were Level C. The most common angulation was vertical, followed by buccoangular. Almost all of the Level C molars were in contact with the roots of the second molar. Erupted teeth most commonly had three roots, and completely impacted teeth most commonly had one root. The superimposition of one third of the root and the sinus floor was most commonly associated with the sinus floor being located on the buccal side of the root.
CONCLUSION
Eruption levels were differently distributed according to gender. A statistically significant association was found between the eruption level and the available retromolar space. When panoramic radiographs showed a superimposition of the roots and the sinus floor, expansion of the sinus to the buccal side of the root was generally observed in CBCT images.

Keyword

Maxilla; Molar, Third; Maxillary sinus; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography; Radiography, Panoramic

MeSH Terms

Cone-Beam Computed Tomography*
Dental Occlusion
Female
Humans
Male
Maxilla
Maxillary Sinus
Molar
Molar, Third*
Radiography, Panoramic*
Tooth
Tooth, Impacted

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Eruption levels of maxillary third molars on panoramic radiographs. A. Level A, the occlusal plane of the third molar is at the same level as the adjacent second molar. B. Level B, the occlusal plane of the third molar is between the occlusal plane and the cervical line of the adjacent tooth; C. Level C, the occlusal plane of the third molar is apical to the cervical line of the adjacent tooth.

• 

  Fig. 2 Classification of the available retromolar space on panoramic radiographs. A. Sufficient, a space greater than or equal to the mesiodistal length of the third molar; B. Reduced, a space greater than half and less than the mesiodistal length of the third molar; C. Insufficient, a space less than half the mesiodistal length of the third molar.

• 

  Fig. 3 The relationship between the root of the maxillary third molars and the sinus on panoramic radiographs. A. Class 1, the sinus floor is above the roots. B. Class 2, the sinus floor touches the root tips. C. Class 3, the sinus floor is superimposed on up to one third the root. D. Class 4, the sinus floor is superimposed on up to two thirds of the root. E. Class 5, the sinus floor extends up to the tooth cervix.

• 

  Fig. 4 Classification of the angulation of the maxillary third molars on cone-beam computed tomography images. V, vertical; B, buccoangular; L, linguoangular; BL, buccolingual; M, mesioangular; D, distoangular; H, horizontal; I, inverted.

• 

  Fig. 5 The horizontal relationship between the root of the maxillary third molars and the sinus on cone-beam computed tomography images. A. Type B, the lowest point of the sinus floor is located on the buccal side of the root. B. Type C, the root is projects into the sinus. C. Type P, the lowest point of the sinus is located on the palatal side of the root. D. Type M, the lowest point of the sinus is located on the mesial side of the third molar. E. Type D, the lowest point of the sinus is located on the distal side.

Reference

1. de Carvalho RW, de Araújo Filho RC, do Egito Vasconcelos BC. Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty during removal of impacted maxillary third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013; 71:839–845.

2. Patel M, Down K. Accidental displacement of impacted maxillary third molars. Br Dent J. 1994; 177:57–59.

3. Dimitrakopoulos I, Papadaki M. Displacement of a maxillary third molar into the infratemporal fossa: case report. Quintessence Int. 2007; 38:607–610.

4. Gómez-Oliveira G, Arribas-García I, Alvarez-Flores M, Gregoire-Ferriol J, Martínez-Gimeno C. Delayed removal of a maxillary third molar from the infratemporal fossa. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010; 15:e509–e511.

5. Oberman M, Horowitz I, Ramon Y. Accidental displacement of impacted maxillary third molars. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986; 15:756–758.

6. Sverzut CE, Trivellato AE, Lopes LM, Ferraz EP, Sverzut AT. Accidental displacement of impacted maxillary third molar: a case report. Braz Dent J. 2005; 16:167–170.

7. Koerner KR. The removal of impacted third molars. Principles and procedures. Dent Clin North Am. 1994; 38:255–278.

8. Bouquet A, Coudert JL, Bourgeois D, Mazoyer JF, Bossard D. Contributions of reformatted computed tomography and panoramic radiography in the localization of third molars relative to the maxillary sinus. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004; 98:342–347.

9. Iwai T, Chikumaru H, Shibasaki M, Tohnai I. Safe method of extraction to prevent a deeply-impacted maxillary third molar being displaced into the maxillary sinus. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013; 51:e75–e76.

10. Selvi F, Cakarer S, Keskin C, Ozyuvaci H. Delayed removal of a maxillary third molar accidentally displaced into the infratemporal fossa. J Craniofac Surg. 2011; 22:1391–1393.

11. Durmus E, Dolanmaz D, Kucukkolbsi H, Mutlu N. Accidental displacement of impacted maxillary and mandibular third molars. Quintessence Int. 2004; 35:375–377.

12. Kocaelli H, Balcioglu HA, Erdem TL. Displacement of a maxillary third molar into the buccal space: anatomical implications apropos of a case. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 40:650–653.

13. Ozer N, Uçem F, Saruhanoğlu A, Yilmaz S, Tanyeri H. Removal of a maxillary third molar displaced into pterygopalatine fossa via intraoral approach. Case Rep Dent. 2013; 2013:392148.

14. Bobo M, Werther JR. Self-induced displacement of a maxillary molar into the lateral pharyngeal space. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998; 27:38–39.

15. Lee D, Ishii S, Yakushiji N. Displacement of maxillary third molar into the lateral pharyngeal space. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013; 71:1653–1657.

16. Nakamori K, Tomihara K, Noguchi M. Clinical significance of computed tomography assessment for third molar surgery. World J Radiol. 2014; 6:417–423.

17. Carvalho RW, Araújo-Filho RC, Vasconcelos BC. Adverse events during the removal of impacted maxillary third molars. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 43:1142–1147.

18. Pourmand PP, Sigron GR, Mache B, Stadlinger B, Locher MC. The most common complications after wisdom-tooth removal: part 2: a retrospective study of 1,562 cases in the maxilla. Swiss Dent J. 2014; 124:1047–1051.

19. Pell GJ, Gregory BT. Impacted mandibular third molars: classification and modified techniques for removal. Dent Dig. 1933; 9:330–338.

20. Hashemipour MA, Tahmasbi-Arashlow M, Fahimi-Hanzaei F. Incidence of impacted mandibular and maxillary third molars: a radiographic study in a Southeast Iran population. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013; 18:e140–e145.

21. Quek SL, Tay CK, Tay KH, Toh SL, Lim KC. Pattern of third molar impaction in a Singapore Chinese population: a retrospective radiographic survey. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003; 32:548–552.

22. Hugoson A, Kugelberg CF. The prevalence of third molars in a Swedish population. An epidemiological study. Community Dent Health. 1988; 5:121–138.

23. Murtomaa H, Turtola L, Ylipaavalniemi P, Rytömaa I. Status of the third molars in the 20- to 21-year-old Finnish university population. J Am Coll Health. 1985; 34:127–129.

24. Hattab FN, Rawashdeh MA, Fahmy MS. Impaction status of third molars in Jordanian students. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995; 79:24–29.

25. Haidar Z, Shalhoub SY. The incidence of impacted wisdom teeth in a Saudi community. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986; 15:569–571.

26. Bishara SE. Impacted maxillary canines: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992; 101:159–171.

27. Almpani K, Kolokitha OE. Role of third molars in orthodontics. World J Clin Cases. 2015; 3:132–140.

28. Lim AA, Wong CW, Allen JC Jr. Maxillary third molar: patterns of impaction and their relation to oroantral perforation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 70:1035–1039.

29. Rothamel D, Wahl G, d'Hoedt B, Nentwig GH, Schwarz F, Becker J. Incidence and predictive factors for perforation of the maxillary antrum in operations to remove upper wisdom teeth: prospective multicentre study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 45:387–391.

30. Jung YH, Cho BH. Assessment of the relationship between the maxillary molars and adjacent structures using cone beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent. 2012; 42:219–224.