J Korean Ophthalmol Soc.  2010 Sep;51(9):1174-1178. 10.3341/jkos.2010.51.9.1174.

Lateral Tarsal Strip Procedure and Silicone Tube Intubation on the Functional Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea. hbahn@dau.ac.kr

Abstract

PURPOSE
To compare the effects of the lateral tarsal strip procedure alone and the lateral tarsal strip procedure combined with silicone tube intubation in the treatment of functional lacrimal duct obstruction.
METHODS
The present study investigated 27 eyes of 20 patients underwent lateral tarsal strip procedure (LTS) alone and 29 eyes of 18 patients underwent combined lateral tarsal strip procedure and silicone tube intubation and who were diagnosed with functional lacrimal duct obstruction. The authors retrospectively reviewed patients' medical records for information including age, gender, history, follow-up period, tear meniscus height (TMH), and symptoms.
RESULTS
The average age of the LTS alone group was 60.3 years, and that of the combined groups was 65.9 years. The TMHs in the LTS only and combined operation groups were 0.62 +/- 0.23 mm and 0.62 +/- 0.19 mm before the operation and 0.43 +/- 0.20 mm and 0.26 +/- 0.09 mm after the operation, respectively. The postoperative improvement in epiphora was 74.1% after the LTS alone and 86.2% after combined LTS with silicone tube intubation. The postoperative improvement in epiphora and the operative technique of the lateral tarsal strip-canthus sparing or cantholysis were not relevant.
CONCLUSIONS
Lateral tarsal strip combined with silicone tube intubation appeared useful in the treatment of epiphora patients without anatomic lacrimal duct obstruction. Determining which operative technique of lateral tarsal strip procedure should be chosen is difficult, and the preoperative syringing and snap back test may be helpful.

Keyword

Canthus-sparing ectropion repair; Lacrimal pump; Lateral tarsal strip procedure; Lower lid laxity; Silicone tube intubation

MeSH Terms

Eye
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Intubation
Lacrimal Apparatus Diseases
Lacrimal Duct Obstruction
Medical Records
Nasolacrimal Duct
Retrospective Studies
Silicones
Silicones

Cited by  1 articles

Clinical Effectiveness of the Lateral Tarsal Strip Procedure
Kun Hoo Na, Joon Sik Lee, Hwa Lee, Se Hyun Baek
J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2015;56(6):803-810.    doi: 10.3341/jkos.2015.56.6.803.


Reference

1. Sadiq SA, Downes RN. Epiphora: a quick fix? Eye. 1998. 12:417–418.
2. Cuthbertson FM, Webber S. Assessment of functional nasolacrimal duct obstruction-a survey of ophthalmologists in the southwest. Eye. 2004. 18:20–23.
3. Rosenstock T, Hurwitz JJ. Functional obstruction of the lacrimal drainage passages. Can J Ophthalmol. 1982. 17:249–255.
4. Vick VL, Holds JB, Hartstein ME, Massry GG. Tarsal strip procedure for the correction of tearing. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004. 20:37–39.
5. Jones LT. Epiphora: its causes and new surgical procedures for its cure; a preliminary report. Am J Ophthalmol. 1954. 38:824–831.
6. Jones LT. An anatomical approach to problems of the eyelids and lacrimal apparatus. Arch Ophthalmol. 1961. 66:111–124.
7. Jordan DR, Anderson RL. The lateral tarsal strip revisited. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989. 107:604–606.
8. Woo JM, Shin DM, Park JM, Ahn HB. The effects of lateral tarsal strip procedure on the functional nasolacrimal duct obstruction. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2006. 47:1375–1380.
9. Lemke BN, Cook BE Jr, Lucarelli MJ. Canthus-sparing ectropion repair. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001. 17:161–168.
10. Moore WM, Bentley CR, Olver JM. Functional and anatomic results after two types of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: surgical and holmium laser. Ophthalmology. 2002. 109:1575–1582.
11. Doane MG. Blinking and the mechanics of the lacrimal drainage system. Ophthalmology. 1981. 88:844–851.
12. Jones LT. Epiphora. II. Its relation to the anatomic structures and surgery of the medial canthal region. Am J Ophthalmol. 1957. 43:203–212.
13. Jones LT, Linn ML. The diagnosis of the cause of epiphora. Am J Ophthalmol. 1969. 67:751–754.
14. Hill JC. Treatment of epiphora owing to flaccid eyelids. Arch Ophthalmol. 1979. 97:323–324.
15. Lew H, Lee SY, Kim SJ. The clinical evaluation on the patients complaining of epiphora. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2000. 41:1112–1117.
16. Liu D, Stasior OG. Lower eyelid laxity and ocular symptoms. Am J Ophthalmol. 1983. 95:545–551.
17. Anderson RL, Gordy DD. The tarsal strip procedure. Arch Ophthalmol. 1979. 92:2192–2196.
18. Bick MW. Surgical management of orbital tarsal disparity. Arch Ophthalmol. 1966. 75:386–389.
19. Cannon PS, Sadiq SA. Can eyelid taping predict the benefit of a lateral tarsal strip procedure in patients with eyelid laxity and functional epiphora? Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009. 25:194–196.
20. Becker BB. Tricompartment model of the lacrimal pump mechanism. Ophthalmology. 1992. 99:1139–1145.
21. Chung WS, Park NG. Functional obstruction of the lacrimal draings system. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1995. 36:1435–1438.
22. Wormald PJ, Tsirbas A. Investigation and endoscopic treatment for functional and anatomical obstruction of the nasolacrimal duct system. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2004. 29:352–356.
Full Text Links
  • JKOS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr