J Korean Soc Traumatol.
2006 Jun;19(1):35-40.
Clinical Investigation of Isolated Chest Injury
- Affiliations
-
- 1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, College of Medicine, The Chungbuk National University, Cheongjoo, Korea.
- 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, The Chungbuk National University, Cheongjoo, Korea.
- 3Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, The Chungbuk National University, Cheongjoo, Korea. drrhec@chungbuk.ac.kr
Abstract
-
PURPOSE: Injuries are the third leading cause of death in Korea. Isolated chest injury is not uncommon and shows high mortality and morbidity. Several scoring systems are used for triage and stratification for trauma patients, but no standard system is accepted. We aimed to analyze the accuracy of identification of isolated chest injury by using several scoring systems.
METHODS
We reviewed a total of 75 patients admitted with isolated chest injury between January 2005 and October 2005. Medical records were reviewed by using the Injury Severity Score (ISS), the Revised Trauma Score (RTS), and the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS). The scoring systems were compared by using statistics methods.
RESULTS
The overall predictive accuracy of the TRISS was 12.5%, 12.0% greater than those of the RTS and the ISS. By using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve, the TRISS showed an excellent discriminative power (AUROC 0.931) compared to the ISS (AUROC 0.926) and the RTS (AUROC 0.872).
CONCLUSION
Compared with the RTS and the ISS, the TRISS is an easily applied tool with excellent prognostic abilities for isolated chest trauma patients. However, the TRISS, the ISS, and the RTS showed high specificity and low sensitivity, so another scoring system is required for triage and stratification of isolated chest injury patients.
Keyword
- Chest injury; ISS; RTS; TRISS
