J Adv Prosthodont.  2015 Oct;7(5):343-348. 10.4047/jap.2015.7.5.343.

Porcelain repair - Influence of different systems and surface treatments on resin bond strength

• Yoo JY
• Yoon HI
• Park JM
• Park EJ

• KMID: 2083876
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.5.343

Abstract

PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bond strength of composite resin on the fracture surface of metal-ceramic depending on the repair systems and surface roughening methods.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A total of 30 disk specimens were fabricated, 15 of each were made from feldspathic porcelain and nickel-chromium base metal alloy. Each substrate was divided into three groups according to the repair method: a) application of repair system I (Intraoral Repair Kit) with diamond bur roughening (Group DP and DM), b) application of repair system I with airborne-particle abrasion (Group SP and SM), and c) application of repair system II (CoJet Intraoral Repair System, Group CP and CM). All specimens were thermocycled, and the shear bond strength was measured. The data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis analysis and the Mann-Whitney test with a significance level of 0.05.
RESULTS
For the porcelain specimens, group SP showed the highest shear bond strength (25.85 +/- 3.51 MPa) and group DP and CP were not significantly different. In metal specimens, group CM showed superior values of bond strength (13.81 +/- 3.45 MPa) compared to groups DM or SM.
CONCLUSION
Airborne-particle abrasion and application of repair system I can be recommended in the case of a fracture localized to the porcelain. If the fracture extends to metal surface, the repair system II is worthy of consideration.

Keyword

Porcelain repair; Composite resin; Shear bond strength; Tribochemical silica coating

MeSH Terms

Alloys
Dental Instruments
Dental Porcelain*
Alloys
Dental Porcelain

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Specimen of resin composite bonded to substrate aligned in universal testing machine for measurement of shear bond strength (A: apparatus of shear load, C: resin composite, P: poly-methyl methacrylate mold with porcelain or metal substrates).

Reference

1. dos Santos JG, Fonseca RG, Adabo GL, dos Santos Cruz CA. Shear bond strength of metal-ceramic repair systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 96:165–173.

2. Ozcan M, Vallittu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater. 2003; 19:725–731.

3. Gordon SR, Lloyd PM. Fixed prosthodontics in the elderly population. Life expectancy of fixed restorations, failures, and retreatment methods. Dent Clin North Am. 1992; 36:783–795.

4. Walton JN, Gardner FM, Agar JR. A survey of crown and fixed partial denture failures: length of service and reasons for replacement. J Prosthet Dent. 1986; 56:416–421.

5. Leibrock A, Degenhart M, Behr M, Rosentritt M, Handel G. In vitro study of the effect of thermo- and load-cycling on the bond strength of porcelain repair systems. J Oral Rehabil. 1999; 26:130–137.

6. Ozcan M. Fracture reasons in ceramic-fused-to-metal restorations. J Oral Rehabil. 2003; 30:265–269.

7. Coornaert J, Adriaens P, De Boever J. Long-term clinical study of porcelain-fused-to-gold restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1984; 51:338–342.

8. Strub JR, Stiffler S, Schärer P. Causes of failure following oral rehabilitation: biological versus technical factors. Quintessence Int. 1988; 19:215–222.

9. Libby G, Arcuri MR, LaVelle WE, Hebl L. Longevity of fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1997; 78:127–131.

10. Ozcan M, Niedermeier W. Clinical study on the reasons for and location of failures of metal-ceramic restorations and survival of repairs. Int J Prosthodont. 2002; 15:299–302.

11. Barzilay I, Myers ML, Cooper LB, Graser GN. Mechanical and chemical retention of laboratory cured composite to metal surfaces. J Prosthet Dent. 1988; 59:131–137.

12. Haselton DR, Diaz-Arnold AM, Dunne JT Jr. Shear bond strengths of 2 intraoral porcelain repair systems to porcelain or metal substrates. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 86:526–531.

13. Haneda IG, Fonseca RG, de Almeida JG, Cruz CA, Adabo GL. Shear bond strength of metal-ceramic repair systems. Gen Dent. 2009; 57:644–651.

14. Robin C, Scherrer SS, Wiskott HW, de Rijk WG, Belser UC. Weibull parameters of composite resin bond strengths to porcelain and noble alloy using the Rocatec system. Dent Mater. 2002; 18:389–395.

15. Panah FG, Rezai SM, Ahmadian L. The influence of ceramic surface treatments on the micro-shear bond strength of composite resin to IPS Empress 2. J Prosthodont. 2008; 17:409–414.

16. Lacy AM, LaLuz J, Watanabe LG, Dellinges M. Effect of porcelain surface treatment on the bond to composite. J Prosthet Dent. 1988; 60:288–291.

17. Stangel I, Nathanson D, Hsu CS. Shear strength of the composite bond to etched porcelain. J Dent Res. 1987; 66:1460–1465.

18. Chen JH, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of etchant, etching period, and silane priming on bond strength to porcelain of composite resin. Oper Dent. 1998; 23:250–257.

19. Wolf DM, Powers JM, O'Keefe KL. Bond strength of composite to porcelain treated with new porcelain repair agents. Dent Mater. 1992; 8:158–161.

20. Suliman AH, Swift EJ Jr, Perdigao J. Effects of surface treatment and bonding agents on bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. J Prosthet Dent. 1993; 70:118–120.

21. Tulunoglu IF, Beydemir B. Resin shear bond strength to porcelain and a base metal alloy using two polymerization schemes. J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 83:181–186.

22. Borges GA, Sophr AM, de Goes MF, Sobrinho LC, Chan DC. Effect of etching and airborne particle abrasion on the microstructure of different dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 89:479–488.

23. Shahverdi S, Canay S, Sahin E, Bilge A. Effects of different surface treatment methods on the bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. J Oral Rehabil. 1998; 25:699–705.

24. Yanagida H, Tanoue N, Ide T, Matsumura H. Evaluation of two dual-functional primers and a tribochemical surface modification system applied to the bonding of an indirect composite resin to metals. Odontology. 2009; 97:103–108.

25. Yoshida K, Taira Y, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of adhesive metal primers on bonding a prosthetic composite resin to metals. J Prosthet Dent. 1993; 69:357–362.

26. Ozcan M, Valandro LF, Amaral R, Leite F, Bottino MA. Bond strength durability of a resin composite on a reinforced ceramic using various repair systems. Dent Mater. 2009; 25:1477–1483.

27. Kalra A, Mohan MS, Gowda EM. Comparison of shear bond strength of two porcelain repair systems after different surface treatment. Contemp Clin Dent. 2015; 6:196–200.

28. Zalkind M, Slavik J, Raviv E, Stern N. Bond strength of photocured composite resin facings: clinical versus laboratory procedures. J Oral Rehabil. 1998; 25:694–698.

29. Matinlinna JP, Vallittu PK. Bonding of resin composites to etchable ceramic surfaces - an insight review of the chemical aspects on surface conditioning. J Oral Rehabil. 2007; 34:622–630.

30. Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent. 1999; 27:89–99.

31. Diaz-Arnold AM, Aquilino SA. An evaluation of the bond strengths of four organosilane materials in response to thermal stress. J Prosthet Dent. 1989; 62:257–260.

32. Roulet JF, Söderholm KJ, Longmate J. Effects of treatment and storage conditions on ceramic/composite bond strength. J Dent Res. 1995; 74:381–387.