Korean J Urol.  2014 Sep;55(9):628-628. 10.4111/kju.2014.55.9.628.

Letter to the Editor: Vienna Nomogram-Based Prostate Biopsy: Can It Be a Much Better Diagnostic Tool Than Other Conventional Prostate Biopsies?

• Ho CC
• Ho SE
• Das S

• KMID: 2069783
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2014.55.9.628

Abstract

No abstract available.

Reference

1. Teo JK, Poh BK, Ng FC, Fong YK. Detection rate of prostate cancer on the basis of the vienna nomogram: a singapore study. Korean J Urol. 2014; 55:245–248.

2. Singam P, Bahadzor B, Abas A, Hee TG, Ho C, Hong GE, et al. Prostate cancer detection via transrectal ultrasound biopsy: vienna nomogram versus sextant/octant biopsy methods. Urotoday Int J. 2012; 5:art 47.

3. Lecuona A, Heyns CF. A prospective, randomized trial comparing the Vienna nomogram to an eight-core prostate biopsy protocol. BJU Int. 2011; 108:204–208.

4. Mariappan P, Chong WL, Sundram M, Mohamed SR. Increasing prostate biopsy cores based on volume vs the sextant biopsy: a prospective randomized controlled clinical study on cancer detection rates and morbidity. BJU Int. 2004; 94:307–310.