Korean J Urol.  2011 Oct;52(10):698-702. 10.4111/kju.2011.52.10.698.

Comparison of an Indwelling Period Following Ureteroscopic Removal of Stones between Double-J Stents and Open-Ended Catheters: A Prospective, Pilot, Randomized, Multicenter Study

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Urology, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. swleepark@hanyang.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Urology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether long-term, postoperative ureteral stenting is necessary after ureteroscopic removal of stones (URS) during an uncomplicated surgical procedure.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We prospectively examined 54 patients who underwent URS for lower ureteral stones from February 2010 to October 2010. Inclusion criteria were a stone less than 10 mm in diameter, absence of ureteral stricture, and absence of ureteral injury during surgery. We randomly placed 5 Fr. open-tip ureteral catheters in 26 patients and removed the Foley catheter at postoperative day 1. The remaining 28 patients received double-J stents that were removed at postoperative day 14 by cystoscopy under local anesthesia. All patients provided visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores at postoperative days 1, 7, and 14 and completed the storage categories of the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at postoperative day 7.
RESULTS
The VAS scores were not significantly different on postoperative day 1 but were significantly smaller in the 1-day ureteral catheter group at postoperative days 7 and 14 (p<0.01). All of the storage categories of the IPSS were significantly lower in the 1-day ureteral stent group (p<0.01). The ratio of patients who needed intravenous analgesics because of severe postoperative flank pain was not significantly different between the two groups (p=0.81). No patients experienced severe flank pain after postoperative day 2, and no patients in either group had any other complications.
CONCLUSIONS
One-day ureteral catheter placement after URS can reduce postoperative pain and did not cause specific complications compared with conventional double-J stent placement.

Keyword

Pain; Ureteroscopy; Urinary Catheterization

MeSH Terms

Analgesics
Anesthesia, Local
Catheters
Constriction, Pathologic
Cystoscopy
Flank Pain
Humans
Pain, Postoperative
Prospective Studies
Prostate
Stents
Ureter
Ureteroscopy
Urinary Catheterization
Urinary Catheters
Analgesics

Figure

  • FIG. 1 Visual Analogue Scale score over time. Group 1: 5 Fr ureteral catheter placement for 1 day, Group 2: 5 Fr double-J ureteral stent placement for 14 days. a: Student's independent t-test


Cited by  1 articles

Adverse Effects of Ureteral Stent and Development of the Antireflux Ureteral Stent
Jung Woo Lee, Chang-Ju Park, Sangdo Jeong, Jong-Hyun Lee, Hong Sang Moon
Hanyang Med Rev. 2013;33(3):178-184.    doi: 10.7599/hmr.2013.33.3.178.


Reference

1. Finney RP. Experience with new double J ureteral catheter stent. J Urol. 1978; 120:678–681. PMID: 731804.
Article
2. Hepperlen TW, Mardis HK, Kammandel H. Self-retained internal ureteral stents: a new approach. J Urol. 1978; 119:731–734. PMID: 77917.
Article
3. Lee JH, Woo SH, Kim ET, Kim DK, Park J. Comparison of patient satisfaction with treatment outcomes between ureteroscopy and shock wave lithotripsy for proximal ureteral stones. Korean J Urol. 2010; 51:788–793. PMID: 21165201.
Article
4. Harmon WJ, Sershon PD, Blute ML, Patterson DE, Segura JW. Ureteroscopy: current practice and long-term complications. J Urol. 1997; 157:28–32. PMID: 8976208.
Article
5. Boddy SA, Nimmon CC, Jones S, Ramsay JW, Britton KE, Levison DA, et al. Acute ureteric dilatation for ureteroscopy. An experimental study. Br J Urol. 1988; 61:27–31. PMID: 3342296.
Article
6. Hosking DH, McColm SE, Smith WE. Is stenting following ureteroscopy for removal of distal ureteral calculi necessary? J Urol. 1999; 161:48–50. PMID: 10037365.
Article
7. Djaladat H, Tajik P, Payandemehr P, Alehashemi S. Ureteral catheterization in uncomplicated ureterolithotripsy: a randomized,controlled trial. Eur Urol. 2007; 52:836–841. PMID: 17258387.
8. Stoller ML, Wolf JS Jr, Hofmann R, Marc B. Ureteroscopy without routine balloon dilation: an outcome assessment. J Urol. 1992; 147:1238–1242. PMID: 1569657.
Article
9. Netto Junior NR, Claro Jde A, Esteves SC, Andrade EF. Ureteroscopic stone removal in the distal ureter. Why change? J Urol. 1997; 157:2081–2083. PMID: 9146584.
10. Bregg K, Riehle RA Jr. Morbidity associated with indwelling internal ureteral stents after shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol. 1989; 141:510–512. PMID: 2918584.
Article
11. Pollard SG, Macfarlane R. Symptoms arising from Double-J ureteral stents. J Urol. 1988; 139:37–38. PMID: 2961892.
Article
12. Han CH, Ha US, Park DJ, Kim SH, Lee YS, Kang SH. Change of symptom characteristics with time in patients with indwelling double-J ureteral stents. Korean J Urol. 2005; 46:1137–1140.
13. Hollenbeck BK, Schuster TG, Faerber GJ, Wolf JS Jr. Routine placement of ureteral stents is unnecessary after ureteroscopy for urinary calculi. Urology. 2001; 57:639–643. PMID: 11306367.
Article
14. Kim KS, Kim JS, Park SW. study on the effects and safety of propofol anesthesia during cytoscopy. Korean J Urol. 2006; 47:1230–1235.
15. Denstedt JD, Wollin TA, Sofer M, Nott L, Weir M, D'A Honey RJ. A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing nonstented versus stented ureteroscopic lithotripsy. J Urol. 2001; 165:1419–1422. PMID: 11342889.
Article
16. Nabi G, Cook J, N'Dow J, McClinton S. Outcomes of stenting after uncomplicated ureteroscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2007; 334:572. PMID: 17311851.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJU
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr