J Gynecol Oncol.  2009 Mar;20(1):28-34. 10.3802/jgo.2009.20.1.28.

Comparison of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil versus cisplatin plus paclitaxel in patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu, Daegu, Korea. drcys@cu.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu, Daegu, Korea.
  • 3Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu, Daegu, Korea.

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to compare survival outcomes and toxicities between concurrent radiotherapy with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil and that with cisplatin plus paclitaxel in patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma.
METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed data from 93 locally advanced cervical carcinoma patients (stage IB to IVA) who had been treated by concurrent radiotherapy with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (CF, n=45) vs. cisplatin plus paclitaxel (CP, n=48) as primary therapy. Toxicities and survival outcomes were compared.
RESULTS
In the CP group, there were higher frequencies of severe (grade 3 or 4) leukopenia (79.2%, as compared to 11.1% in the CF group), severe neutropenia (77.1%, as compared to 8.9% in the CF group) and severe peripheral neuropathy (12.5%, as compared to 2.2% in the CF group). In the CF group, there were higher frequencies of severe nausea (33.3%, as compared to 14.6% in the CP group) and severe hyponatremia (11.1%, as compared to 0% in the CP group). Five-year DFS of the CF and CP groups was 67.4% and 79.1%, respectively (p=NS). Five year OS of the CF and CP groups was 79.6% and 80.9%, respectively (p=NS).
CONCLUSION
Concurrent radiotherapy with cisplatin plus paclitaxel showed increased leukopenia, neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy, but less gastrointestinal toxicity (nausea) than that with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil. Survival outcome between these two groups was not statistically different in this study. Large prospective randomized controlled studies will be needed to confirm this result.

Keyword

Cervical cancer; Chemoradiotherapy; Cisplatin; 5-fluorouracil; Paclitaxel

MeSH Terms

Chemoradiotherapy
Cisplatin
Fluorouracil
Humans
Hyponatremia
Leukopenia
Nausea
Neutropenia
Paclitaxel
Peripheral Nervous System Diseases
Retrospective Studies
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Cisplatin
Fluorouracil
Paclitaxel

Figure

  • Fig. 1 (A) Kaplan-Meier estimates of disease free survival among patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (n=45) or plus paclitaxel (n=48). (B) Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival among patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (n=45) or plus paclitaxel (n=48).


Reference

1. National Cancer Institute. Concurrent chemoradiation for cervical cancer. Clinical announcement. 1999. 02. 22. Washington, D.C.:
2. Rose PG, Bundy BN, Watkins EB, Thigpen JT, Deppe G, Maiman MA, et al. Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999. 340:1144–1153.
3. Keys HM, Bundy BN, Stehman FB, Muderspach LI, Chafe WE, Suggs CL 3rd, et al. Cisplatin, radiation, and adjuvant hysterectomy compared with radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy for bulky stage IB cervical carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1999. 340:1154–1161.
4. Morris M, Eifel PJ, Lu J, Grigsby PW, Levenback C, Stevens RE, et al. Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999. 340:1137–1143.
5. Peters WA 3rd, Liu PY, Barrett RJ 2nd, Stock RJ, Monk BJ, Berek JS, et al. Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix. J Clin Oncol. 2000. 18:1606–1613.
6. Whitney CW, Sause W, Bundy BN, Malfetano JH, Hannigan EV, Fowler WC Jr, et al. Randomized comparison of fluorouracil plus cisplatin versus hydroxyurea as an adjunct to radiation therapy in stage IIB-IVA carcinoma of the cervix with negative para-aortic lymph nodes: a Gynecologic Oncology Group and Southwest Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 1999. 17:1339–1348.
7. Geard CR, Jones JM. Radiation and taxol effects on synchronized human cervical carcinoma cells. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994. 29:565–569.
8. Rodriguez M, Sevin BU, Perras J, Nguyen HN, Pham C, Steren AJ, et al. Paclitaxel: a radiation sensitizer of human cervical cancer cells. Gynecol Oncol. 1995. 57:165–169.
9. Pignata S, Frezza P, Tramontana S, Perrone F, Tambaro R, Casella G, et al. Phase I study with weekly cisplatin-paclitaxel and concurrent radiotherapy in patients with carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Ann Oncol. 2000. 11:455–459.
10. Papadimitriou CA, Sarris K, Moulopoulos LA, Fountzilas G, Anagnostopoulos A, Voulgaris Z, et al. Phase II trial of paclitaxel and cisplatin in metastatic and recurrent carcinoma of the uterine cervix. J Clin Oncol. 1999. 17:761–766.
11. DiSilvestro PA, Walker JL, Morrison A, Rose PG, Homesley H, Warshal D, et al. Radiation therapy with concomitant paclitaxel and cisplatin chemotherapy in cervical carcinoma limited to the pelvis: a phase I/II study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Gynecol Oncol. 2006. 103:1038–1042.
12. Miglietta L, Franzone P, Centurioni MG, Boni L, Tacchini L, Cosso M, et al. A phase II trial with cisplatin-paclitaxel cytotoxic treatment and concurrent external and endocavitary radiation therapy in locally advanced or recurrent cervical cancer. Oncology. 2006. 70:19–24.
13. Petera J, Odrazka K, Frgala T, Spacek J. External beam radiotherapy and high-dose brachytherapy combined with cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2005. 99:334–338.
14. Ikushima H, Osaki K, Furutani S, Yamashita K, Kawanaka T, Kishida Y, et al. Chemoradiation therapy for cervical cancer: toxicity of concurrent weekly cisplatin. Radiat Med. 2006. 24:115–121.
15. Gutheil J, Kearns C. Perry MC, editor. Antimetabolites. The chemotherapy source book. 1996. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins;323–325.
16. Kim YS, Shin SS, Nam JH, Kim YT, Kim YM, Kim JH, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of monthly fluorouracil and cisplatin versus weekly cisplatin concurrent with pelvic radiotherapy and high-dose rate brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2008. 108:195–200.
Full Text Links
  • JGO
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr