Hanyang Med Rev.  2012 Feb;32(1):17-24. 10.7599/hmr.2012.32.1.17.

Differentiation Strategy of Graduate Entry Programme

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Medical Education, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea. hyerinr@inje.ac.kr

Abstract

Graduate medical students have been expected to have different characteristics and backgrounds. If it is true, our strategy to educate them should be differentiated. However, basic medical education for graduate entrants in Korea now is not much different from those for non-graduate entrants. Therefore, I investigated the differences between graduate entry and schoolleaver students. Herein, I reviewed their demographics, academic backgrounds, career choice motivation, moral reasoning ability, learning styles and strategy, academic achievement, quality of school life, and outcome after graduation. Also I tried to suggest the differentiated strategy for effective education according to curriculum, teaching and learning, assessment, student support system, and admission selection policy.

Keyword

Graduate Entry Medicine; Medical School; Curriculum; Graduate Medical Education

MeSH Terms

Achievement
Career Choice
Curriculum
Demography
Education, Medical
Education, Medical, Graduate
Humans
Korea
Learning
Motivation
Schools, Medical
Students, Medical

Reference

1. Kim BS, Kim S, Han JH. Comparative study of graduate school of medicine curriculum. J Natl Acad Sci. 2004. 43:1–9.
Article
2. Choi JS, Suh DJ, Chai JY, Ohrr H, Hwang IK, Kang DY. A study of medical education system in Korea. Korean J Med Educ. 1996. 8:189–199.
Article
3. Shin JS. A review on the courses of the introduction of post-baccalaureate basic medical education system in Korea. Korean J Med Educ. 2006. 18:121–132.
Article
4. Han JJ, Lee SN, Kwon I, Park H, Im HJ, Kim Te, et al. The comparison of backgrounds and characteristics of students in medical college and graduate medical school: a case study of one medical school. Korean J Med Educ. 2008. 20:11–21.
Article
5. Park KH, Hong DH, Oh JH, Park YB, Shin DJ, Lee YD. The analysis of academic achievements of students at Gachon medical school. Korean J Med Educ. 2006. 18:289–296.
Article
6. Lee SJ, Kang JW, Kim H, Kim SR, Lee SI, Lee SJ. Comparison of the first year curricular achievements between students of the medical college and the professional graduate medical school in Chungbuk national university. Korean J Med Educ. 2007. 19:73–81.
Article
7. Kim MK, Kang JO. Comparison of career choice motivation and moral reasoning ability between students in baccalaureate and graduate-entry programs. Korean J Med Educ. 2007. 19:91–99.
Article
8. Chung EK, Oh SA, Yoon TY, Lee SJ, Woo YJ, Rhee JA, et al. Comparison of learning styles between medical college students and professional graduate medical school students. Korean J Med Educ. 2009. 21:125–131.
Article
9. Lee JH, Kim GI, Park KH, Yune SJ. Differences in factors affecting medical specialty choices between medical college students and graduate medical school students. Korean J Med Educ. 2009. 21:393–402.
Article
10. Searle J. Graduate entry medicine: what it is and what it isn't. Med Educ. 2004. 38:1130–1132.
11. James D, Ferguson E, Powis D, Symonds I, Yates J. Graduate entry to medicine: widening academic and socio-demographic access. Med Educ. 2008. 42:294–300.
12. Holmes D. Eight years' experience of widening access to medical education. Med Educ. 2002. 36:979–984.
Article
13. Rolfe IE, Ringland C, Pearson SA. Graduate entry to medical school? Testing some assumptions. Med Educ. 2004. 38:778–786.
Article
14. Lee JH. A study of moral sensitivity scale development and the trait of moral sensitivity [master's thesis]. 2005. [Seoul]: Seoul National University;128.
Article
15. Hayes K, Feather A, Hall A, Sedgwick P, Wannan G, Wessier-Smith A, et al. Anxiety in medical students: Is preparation for full-time clinical attachments more dependent upon differences in maturity or on educational programmes for undergraduate and graduate entry students? Med Educ. 2004. 38:1154–1163.
Article
16. Xu G, Veloski JJ, Barzansky B. Comparisons between older and usual-aged medical school graduates on the factors influencing their choices of primary care specialties. Acad Med. 1997. 72:1003–1007.
Article
17. Goldacre MJ, Davidson JM, Lambert TW. The first house officer year: Views of graduate and non-graduate entrants to medical school. Med Educ. 2008. 42:286–293.
Article
18. Powis D, Hamilton J, Gordon J. Are graduate entry programmes the answer to recruiting and selecting tomorrow' s doctors? Med Educ. 2004. 38:1147–1153.
Article
19. Jervie Sefton A. Graduate entry to medical school. Med Educ. 2004. 38:1132–1134.
Article
20. Choi W, Choi JW, Lee SJ. Comparison of 3 years academic achievements between students of the graduate medical school and the medical college. Chungbuk Med J. 2010. 20:149–157.
Article
21. Shehmar M, Haldane T, Price-Forbes A, Macdougall C, Fraser I, Peterson S, et al. Comparing the performance of graduate-entry and school-leaver medical students. Med Educ. 2010. 44:699–705.
Article
22. Dodds AE, Reid KJ, Conn JJ, Elliott SL, McColl GJ. Comparing the academic performance of graduate-and undergraduate-entry medical students. Med Educ. 2010. 44:197–204.
23. Craig PL, Gordon JJ, Clark RM, Langendyk V. Prior academic background and student performance in assessment in a graduate entry programme. Med Educ. 2004. 38:1164–1168.
24. Lee SJ, Choi W, Kim SY, Choi JW. Correlation of academic achievements with cognitive admission variables and demographics at Chungbuk national university graduate medical school. Korean J Med Educ. 2009. 21:59–66.
25. Shin HI, Jeon WT, Yang EB. Relationship between learning strategies and academic achievement in medical college and graduate medical school students. Korean J Med Educ. 2010. 22:197–204.
26. Kwon DS, Cho AM. Adult education and counseling. 2006. 5th ed. Paju: Kyoyook Book;127–147.
Article
27. Knowles MS, Holton EF, Swanson RA. The adult learner: the definitive classic in adult education and human resource development. 2005. Oxford: Elsevier;73–114.
Article
28. Reiter HI, Eva KW, Rosenfeld J, Norman GR. Multiple miniinterviews predict clerkship and licensing examination performance. Med Educ. 2007. 41:378–384.
Article
29. Roh H, Lee HJ, Park SB, Yang JH, Kim DJ, Kim SH, et al. Multiple mini-interview in selecting medical students. Korean J Med Educ. 2009. 21:103–115.
Article
Full Text Links
  • HMR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr