World J Mens Health.  2015 Aug;33(2):95-102. 10.5534/wjmh.2015.33.2.95.

Penile Fracture: Our Experience in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Urology, Institute of Post-Graduate Medical Education and Research and SSKM Hospital, Kolkata, India. urologyipgmer@gmail.com

Abstract

PURPOSE
Penile fracture is rare, but it is a urological emergency that always requires immediate attention. Moreover, penile fracture has been reported more frequently in recent years. It may have devastating physical, functional, and psychological consequences if not properly managed in time.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The objective of this study was to highlight the causes, clinical presentation, and outcomes of cases of penile fracture. This was a prospective observational study extending from November 2012 to November 2014. Each patient underwent a thorough clinical evaluation and received proper treatment.
RESULTS
Twenty patients with penile fracture, aged 19 to 56 years (mean, 28 years) were evaluated in this study. Vaginal intercourse was the most common mechanism of injury. Most of the patients (95%) were diagnosed clinically with a proper history and clinical examination. Nineteen patients were treated surgically. The patients underwent six months of follow-up, and were evaluated with local examinations, questionnaires, and colour Doppler ultrasonography as necessary.
CONCLUSIONS
Although penile fracture is an under-reported urological emergency, its incidence is increasing. It is usually diagnosed based on a clinical examination, but ultrasonography can be very helpful in diagnosis. Especially in cases where treatment is delayed, surgery is preferable to conservative management, because it is associated with better outcomes and fewer long-term complications.

Keyword

Penile diseases; Penile prosthesis; Penis injuries; Urogenital system

MeSH Terms

Diagnosis
Emergencies
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Incidence
Male
Observational Study
Penile Diseases
Penile Prosthesis
Prospective Studies
Tertiary Healthcare*
Ultrasonography
Ultrasonography, Doppler
Urogenital System

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Distal degloving incision and repair of tunical tear.

  • Fig. 2 Direct lateral incision and tunical repair.

  • Fig. 3 International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) score at 3 months postoperatively.


Reference

1. Zargooshi J. Penile fracture in Kermanshah, Iran: report of 172 cases. J Urol. 2000; 164:364–366.
Article
2. Morey AF, Dugi DD 3rd. Genital and lower urinary tract trauma. In : Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Partin AW, Novick AC, editors. Campbell-Walsh urology. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier-Saunders, Co.;2012. p. 2507. p. 2520.
3. Walton JK. Fracture of the penis with laceration of the urethra. Br J Urol. 1979; 51:308–309.
Article
4. Eke N. Fracture of the penis. Br J Surg. 2002; 89:555–565.
Article
5. Zargooshi J. Penile fracture in Kermanshah, Iran: the long-term results of surgical treatment. BJU Int. 2002; 89:890–894.
Article
6. Jack GS, Garraway I, Reznichek R, Rajfer J. Current treatment options for penile fractures. Rev Urol. 2004; 6:114–120.
7. Derouiche A, Belhaj K, Hentati H, Hafsia G, Slama MR, Chebil M. Management of penile fractures complicated by urethral rupture. Int J Impot Res. 2008; 20:111–114.
Article
8. Koga S, Saito Y, Arakaki Y, Nakamura N, Matsuoka M, Saita H, et al. Sonography in fracture of the penis. Br J Urol. 1993; 72:228–229.
Article
9. Miller S, McAninch JW. Penile fracture and soft tissue injury. In : McAninch JW, editor. Traumatic and reconstructive urology. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders;1996. p. 693–698.
10. Muentener M, Suter S, Hauri D, Sulser T. Long-term experience with surgical and conservative treatment of penile fracture. J Urol. 2004; 172:576–579.
Article
11. Agarwal MM, Singh SK, Sharma DK, Ranjan P, Kumar S, Chandramohan V, et al. Fracture of the penis: a radiological or clinical diagnosis? A case series and literature review. Can J Urol. 2009; 16:4568–4575.
12. Mahapatra RK, Ray RP, Mishra S, Pal DK. Urethrocutaneous fistula following fracture penis. Urol Ann. 2014; 6:392–394.
Article
13. Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A. The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology. 1997; 49:822–830.
Article
14. Feldman HA, Goldstein I, Hatzichristou DG, Krane RJ, McKinlay JB. Impotence and its medical and psychosocial correlates: results of the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. J Urol. 1994; 151:54–61.
Article
15. Naroda T, Yamanaka M, Matsushita K, Kimura K, Kawanishi Y, Numata A, et al. Evaluation of resistance index of the cavernous artery with colour Doppler ultrasonography for venogenic impotence. Int J Impot Res. 1994; 6:D62.
16. Malis J, Zur K. Der fractura penis. Arch Klin Chir. 1924; 129:651.
17. Hoekx L, Wyndaele JJ. Fracture of the penis: role of ultrasonography in localizing the cavernosal tear. Acta Urol Belg. 1998; 66:23–25.
18. Karadeniz T, Topsakal M, Ariman A, Erton H, Basak D. Penile fracture: differential diagnosis, management and outcome. Br J Urol. 1996; 77:279–281.
Article
19. Abolyosr A, Moneim AE, Abdelatif AM, Abdalla MA, Imam HM. The management of penile fracture based on clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings. BJU Int. 2005; 96:373–377.
Article
20. Fetter TR, Gartmen E. Traumatic rupture of penis. Case report. Am J Surg. 1936; 32:371–372.
21. Yapanoglu T, Aksoy Y, Adanur S, Kabadayi B, Ozturk G, Ozbey I. Seventeen years' experience of penile fracture: conservative vs. surgical treatment. J Sex Med. 2009; 6:2058–2063.
22. Gamal WM, Osman MM, Hammady A, Aldahshoury MZ, Hussein MM, Saleem M. Penile fracture: long-term results of surgical and conservative management. J Trauma. 2011; 71:491–493.
Article
23. Hinev AI. Re: penile injury. J Urol. 2002; 167:1802–1803.
Article
24. Orvis BR, McAninch JW. Penile rupture. Urol Clin North Am. 1989; 16:369–375.
Article
25. Mydlo JH. Surgeon experience with penile fracture. J Urol. 2001; 166:526–528. discussion 528-9
Article
26. Feki W, Derouiche A, Belhaj K, Ouni A, Ben Mouelhi S, Ben Slama MR, et al. False penile fracture: report of 16 cases. Int J Impot Res. 2007; 19:471–473.
Article
27. Armenakas NA, Hochberg DA, Fracchia JA. Traumatic avulsion of the dorsal penile artery mimicking a penile fracture. J Urol. 2001; 166:619.
Article
28. Bar-Yosef Y, Greenstein A, Beri A, Lidawi G, Matzkin H, Chen J. Dorsal vein injuries observed during penile exploration for suspected penile fracture. J Sex Med. 2007; 4:1142–1146.
Article
29. el-Sherif AE, Dauleh M, Allowneh N, Vijayan P. Management of fracture of the penis in Qatar. Br J Urol. 1991; 68:622–625.
Article
30. Penson DF, Seftel AD, Krane RJ, Frohrib D, Goldstein I. The hemodynamic pathophysiology of impotence following blunt trauma to the erect penis. J Urol. 1992; 148:1171–1180.
Article
31. Nane I, Tefekli A, Armagan A, Sanli O, Kadioglu A. Penile vascular abnormalities observed long-term after surgical repair of penile fractures. Int J Urol. 2004; 11:316–320.
Article
Full Text Links
  • WJMH
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr